Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My advice to you: I think you'll need to purchase them in bulk at Costco judging by all the posts here.

I find it easier to just coat your house in tin foil and stay inside all the time. You're still protected from invisible mind rays and Google satellites, and don't have to worry about hat hair.

Just because they're out to get you don't mean you have to sacrifice your sense of style to keep yourself safe.

----------

Your goal here is obvious.

He's selling spiderboats? :confused:
 
Fun fact: Android will reach 1 billion cumulative devices sold in 2013, and an estimated 2.3 billion in 2015. Apple is estimated to reach 530 million cumulative in 2013 and 1 billion in 2015.

In other words, there will almost be shipped more android devices this year, than apples cumulative number of iPhones made.

Oh my god, then there'll be 9 billion Android devices in use by 2018... WOAH!

Seems you ignored what i clearly said: Android devices are always lagging behind in the adoption of the most recent version of Android.

Of the 750 million Android devices activated there are only 16.5% running Android 4.1 and more than 50% aren't even running Android 4.0, the "Finally less ******"-release.

16.5% of 750 million = a bit less than 125 million devices capable of running Google Now.

When Google releases Google Now on iOS, it will most likely run on any iOS 6 device - that's more than 300 million, including sales in this quarter the number will reach 330 million or more.

The day Google Now is released on iOS, more than SEVENTY percent of the devices capable of Google Now are iPhones, iPads and iPod Touch.


That should make every Android fanboy ultra-sad, because it show's that iOS is still the dominant mobile OS.

Not in mumbojumbo market share, but in all points that count, like actual usage as a smartphone, instead of usage as a feature phone or in this case - features available to the most people.

Whatever feature Google will anounce for Android 5.0 during I/O 2013 - they will be available to the less than 20 (actually, 10 million is more likely) million people who bought the Nexus 7, Nexus 10 or Nexus 4 til then.

iOS 7?

100 million users a week later, 300 million after 3 months.
 
I find it easier to just coat your house in tin foil and stay inside all the time. You're still protected from invisible mind rays and Google satellites, and don't have to worry about hat hair.

Just because they're out to get you don't mean you have to sacrifice your sense of style to keep yourself safe.

You also have to cover your whole body too, Google satellites can attempt to extract private information from your semen.

----------

Oh my god, then there'll be 9 billion Android devices in use by 2018... WOAH!

Seems you ignored what i clearly said: Android devices are always lagging behind in the adoption of the most recent version of Android.

Of the 750 million Android devices activated there are only 16.5% running Android 4.1 and more than 50% aren't even running Android 4.0, the "Finally less ******"-release.

16.5% of 750 million = a bit less than 125 million devices capable of running Google Now.

When Google releases Google Now on iOS, it will most likely run on any iOS 6 device - that's more than 300 million, including sales in this quarter the number will reach 330 million or more.

The day Google Now is released on iOS, more than SEVENTY percent of the devices capable of Google Now are iPhones, iPads and iPod Touch.


That should make every Android fanboy ultra-sad, because it show's that iOS is still the dominant mobile OS.

Not in mumbojumbo market share, but in all points that count, like actual usage as a smartphone, instead of usage as a feature phone or in this case - features available to the most people.

Whatever feature Google will anounce for Android 5.0 during I/O 2013 - they will be available to the less than 20 (actually, 10 million is more likely) million people who bought the Nexus 7, Nexus 10 or Nexus 4 til then.

iOS 7?

100 million users a week later, 300 million after 3 months.

All this to say nothing.

How does this change the fact that there will be more Android users?

I don't mean to defend Android but your whole post literally means nothing at all. Just semantics to defend the numbers of a corporation that does not care for you. Why try so hard?
 
All this to say nothing.

How does this change the fact that there will be more Android users?

I don't mean to defend Android but your whole post literally means nothing at all. Just semantics to defend the numbers of a corporation that does not care for you. Why try so hard?

Because until now, nobody has defined what "Winning" means, even when they say Android is winning all the time.

Sooo much more people are using Android, Android has won!!!!!!


But more people are USING their iPhones, buying stuff with their iPhones, taking pictures with their iPhones, Apple is making 70% of the profits of ALL mobile phone makers, with Samsung taking the other 30%.

How is a higher marketshare due to people who don't ********** care what OS they are running, because they aren't using their phones to do anything else than calling and texting people relevant and not just relevant but the most important metric and reason why Apple is said to be losing?


You know who lost?

Nokia!

Because Android is the new Symbian.
 
If Apple Maps was even close to functioning properly they wouldnt have allowed Google Maps in. They received a firestorm of negative publicity that forced their hand.

Just like all those other maps apps, which existed long before Apple Maps, were never allowed in. Oh wait, they were. Ooops.
 
Because until now, nobody has defined what "Winning" means, even when they say Android is winning all the time.

Sooo much more people are using Android, Android has won!!!!!!


But more people are USING their iPhones, buying stuff with their iPhones, taking pictures with their iPhones, Apple is making 70% of the profits of ALL mobile phone makers, with Samsung taking the other 30%.

How is a higher marketshare due to people who don't ********** care what OS they are running, because they aren't using their phones to do anything else than calling and texting people relevant and not just relevant but the most important metric and reason why Apple is said to be losing?


You know who lost?

Nokia!

Because Android is the new Symbian.

Who the #$@# cares who wins? Does the money go in our pocket? The harsher the competition, the better the products offered to us. Drop the hate.
 
youre still the product. the customers are the commercial entitites that pay their money to google to access...you, the user. you are the product.

its not terribly difficult.

No, you're not.

The ad space is the product.

Oh, and better not use the iPhone because iAds gets your information as well. Not only that, but you're just as opted-in by default as with Google. They both say they don't sell your personal information, but they're both just as trustworthy as the other.
 
Fan + Android = Fandroid. What's juvenile or name-calling about that? It's nothing derogatory like, say, iSheep.

They're both derogatory, especialy when used on someone who is not an annoying fanboy. But you wouldn't know that, right? You have so much hate in you, the little derogative statement must be pleasant for you.
 
Well no, but google don't hide the fact they make all their money from mining your habit and data.

You mean like they didn't hide the fact that they were scanning WiFis and logging MAC addresses with their StreetView cars for three years? Of course it was purely "by mistake".
 
They're both derogatory, especialy when used on someone who is not an annoying fanboy. But you wouldn't know that, right? You have so much hate in you, the little derogative statement must be pleasant for you.

Well, the Apple customers never started this.

They have been called stupid sheep or more recently iSheep, brainless or "disciples" (translation from the word that is used most often in German boards, Apple-Jünger").

The iPhone had such lovely names like - again a translation - Eierfön, which could be translated as egg/testicle-hairdryer.

So please explain again WHICH SIDE has sooo much hate?!
 
You mean like they didn't hide the fact that they were scanning WiFis and logging MAC addresses with their StreetView cars for three years? Of course it was purely "by mistake".

God forbid a mapping service scans for wifi.

----------

The iPhone had such lovely names like - again a translation - Eierfön, which could be translated as egg/testicle-hairdryer.

It's true. You do learn something new everyday.
 
God forbid a mapping service scans for wifi.

And contents from unencrypted wifis.

During that time, i defended Google, said - like Google said at that time - that it was an accident.

Turned out it wasn't accidental, but planned.
 
You mean like they didn't hide the fact that they were scanning WiFis and logging MAC addresses with their StreetView cars for three years? Of course it was purely "by mistake".

Why Google would have to hide Wifi and MAC scanning? It is how wifi geopositioning works. Or how do you think iPhones can geolocate you using wifi?
 
Well, the Apple customers never started this.

They have been called stupid sheep or more recently iSheep, brainless or "disciples" (translation from the word that is used most often in German boards, Apple-Jünger").

The iPhone had such lovely names like - again a translation - Eierfön, which could be translated as egg/testicle-hairdryer.

So please explain again WHICH SIDE has sooo much hate?!

BOTH.

The "he started it" isn't a good defense...
 
And contents from unencrypted wifis.

During that time, i defended Google, said - like Google said at that time - that it was an accident.

Turned out it wasn't accidental, but planned.

I haven't read all that much on it, admittedly, but from what I understand, I thought it was just something one of their programmers threw in for a lark that ended up getting used unintentionally. It did have the added bonus of sniffing out wifi hotspots to place on a map, though.

And really, what could they do with quick snippets of data cherrypicked from driving by a wifi equipped house?
 
Well, the Apple customers never started this.

They have been called stupid sheep or more recently iSheep, brainless or "disciples" (translation from the word that is used most often in German boards, Apple-Jünger").

The iPhone had such lovely names like - again a translation - Eierfön, which could be translated as egg/testicle-hairdryer.

So please explain again WHICH SIDE has sooo much hate?!

I didn't say one side had more than the other. I just said LagunaSol has a lot of hate.
 
Well, the Apple customers never started this.

They have been called stupid sheep or more recently iSheep, brainless or "disciples" (translation from the word that is used most often in German boards, Apple-Jünger").

The iPhone had such lovely names like - again a translation - Eierfön, which could be translated as egg/testicle-hairdryer.

So please explain again WHICH SIDE has sooo much hate?!

Speaking as someone who owns and uses a testicle-hairdryer, I can only say that they are an invaluable device and if anyone is comparing an iPhone to one it surely must be meant as a compliment.
 
Speaking as someone who owns and uses a testicle-hairdryer, I can only say that they are an invaluable device and if anyone is comparing an iPhone to one it surely must be meant as a compliment.

So umh... why does one use a testicle dryer? :confused:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.