Not understanding at all why ANYONe would want to watch a BD on a small screen.
Set your screen to the lowest resolution possible for everything.....
Not understanding at all why ANYONe would want to watch a BD on a small screen.
The DRM requirements for Blu-ray are atrocious. That's why if you're a PC power user you probably own Slysoft's AnyDVD HD.
Microsoft had to go as far as to implement a system-wide DRM protection scheme for both audio and video outputs in Windows Vista and 7.
It's one thing if Apple could get away with creating a Blu-ray player application that meets the DRM standards. It's another if they have to implement a content protection system for Mac OS X.
At least with FairPlay, it's confined to QuickTime.
Apple's DRM still allows you to output sound and video without copy protection (ie, apps like Audio Hijack Pro can hijack and record audio originating from DRM-ed sources, in the same way DVI outputs video without any DRM attached to it).This is not even remotely an argument.
Did you find Apple's own DRM implementation anywhere in Darwin, which would be the Open Source parts of Mac OS X? No, you didn't. Why? Because those DRM layers are somewhere in the proprietary parts of the OS that they won't ever show you.
Must Apple Open Source anything from their OS? No. Why? Because the relevant platform parts are based upon code that was released under the BSD license, which allows for closing the source code.
Not understanding at all why ANYONe would want to watch a BD on a small screen. I bought my first flat screen last summer (46 inches) along with my first BD player and LOVE the damn thing more and more. It's gorgeous and I am hooked. the only reason to put BD players on Mac is for HD editing.
I don't care about Blu-Ray, I don't want another disk that costs a lot and takes ages to burn. Burning a DVD is a pain already as it is, taking 15 minutes to burn a freaking disc.
The future is in small, reusable mediums such as USB drives that you buy once and re-use as many times as you like. It's more eco-friendly, allows for large storage, they're fast and not fragile. They don't require a "drive" with motors and mechanics inside, and take up a ridiculous amount of space in today's increasingly thin notebooks.
The idea of "another disk with more capacity" is the wrong one, I think. People should take new approaches to mobile media.
I also don't see the point in paying more just to get a slightly higher resolution movie, for which you need a special high-resolution screen anyway. Also, the difference cannot be seen if you sit far enough from the TV screen.
Downloads are fast today, you can rent a movie on iTunes and play it without waiting even on a relatively slow, 4mbps connection. This will get much better soon, as ISPs start offering cheaper and faster connections.
Anyone hear of an external Blu-Ray player?
http://trac.handbrake.fr/wiki/x264OptionsCABAC, or context adaptive binary arithmetic coding, is used by x264 to reduce the bitrate needed for a given quality by 15%. This makes it very cool and very useful, and it should be left on whenever possible. However, it is incompatible with the iPod 5.5G, and makes the AppleTV struggle. So turn it off for those. CABAC is a kind of entropy coding, which means that it compresses data by making shorthand symbols to represent long streams of data. The "entropy" part means that the symbols it uses the most often are the smallest. When you disable CABAC, another entropy coding scheme gets enabled, called CAVLC (context adaptive variable-length coding). CAVLC is a lot less efficient, which is why it needs 15% more bitrate to achieve the same quality as CABAC.
What were the specs on your friend's Win 7 box? I can almost guarantee it's not as old as your machine.
Anyway you slice it AVCHD is a pain to edit in. It sounds like you were under the gun and were rushed for time which resulted in poor planning on your part.
The low-resolution import is actually a slower import because it has to downsize the footage so you're really adding an extra step in there. Keep the resolution as high as possible next time and you'll be better off. Instead of trying to save disk space, get a faster external hard drive for editing and copy your footage there before you point iMovie to the import. It'll make a difference. Using an internal laptop drive and reading from the SD card during the editing process is just asking for trouble.
If you have a copy of Toast, it'll take the .mts files as well and create a DVD out of them. It's quick if you don't need the menus.
Isn't Apple the company that ditched floppy disks because CDs were a newer and better technology?
But no. We're just going to stick around with DVD forever now because blu-ray is a "bag of hurt."
As for Blu Ray, it's over. We're heading into streaming. Blu Ray is done. Apple blew past the issue like a tailback breaking through the Detroit Lions' secondary. The consumer barely noticed. Apple kept selling record numbers of Macs quarter-for-quarter.
I'd like Jobs to explain "Bag of hurt"
If Dell or Sony can get BRD to play on their inferior (and cheaper) LAPTOPS can we not devote a few hours of work into at least letting the Mac play the disc from an external drive or maybe, MAYBE even let the consume pay for the option to have an internal burning drive???
Jobs profits from BRD sales by being on the Disney board who pushes BRD constantly and for good reason. iTunes stuff is fine for some but I will hold out as long as I possibly can from buying Music or Video. Long live physical media!
Steve was right. Again.
As for Blu Ray, it's over. We're heading into streaming. Blu Ray is done. Apple blew past the issue like a tailback breaking through the Detroit Lions' secondary. The consumer barely noticed. Apple kept selling record numbers of Macs quarter-for-quarter.
Steve was right. Again.
According to the report's sources, there continues to be substantial turmoil over the imminent discontinuation of Apple's rackmountable server line due to poor sales. A number of high-profile users, including Apple director and former Genentech chairman Art Levinson, have reportedly complained about the discontinuation, and while Hardmac indicates that "this storm is maybe not over", it is unclear if Apple is contemplating some alternative to canceling the Xserve line.[/url].
Ha! ashamed Blu-Ray is associated with oh and using Microsoft Office 2010 on Windows... Word opens as soon as i click the icon.... 2 minutes later after a continuous beachball, it's nice to start work on Pages '09.....![]()
OEM's like Dell and Sony don't have to deal with the same costs that Apple do and they don't have to worry about OS support. The comparison is extremely flawed.I'd like Jobs to explain "Bag of hurt"
If Dell or Sony can get BRD to play on their inferior (and cheaper) LAPTOPS can we not devote a few hours of work into at least letting the Mac play the disc from an external drive or maybe, MAYBE even let the consume pay for the option to have an internal burning drive???
steve could say that 2+2 is 5 and you would use some twisted logic to say he's right.