Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What’s the most interesting thing is how so many people love to remind us how small of a marketshare Macs have yet Intel apparently can’t afford the loss of Apple’s business and is so salty that they have to pathetically throw shade against a product that has “so little” marketshare based on what the anti-Apple crowd says. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
Yes, and that was because Apple had something to prove… they were tiny and an unknown quantity. Is Intel attempting to indicate they are a tiny and unknown quantity? Apple’s PC marketshare is STILL so small that Intel are more likely letting folks know “There’s actual competition to us, and we’ll tell you about it here.” than they are just touting their systems.
Apple was "tiny and unknown" ten years ago? Seriously?
 
I almost hate to say it but I reckon in the years to come they will have to go back on Steve and fold on a touchscreen Mac
Nahhh, the Mac is a dead system walking. Anyone seriously interested in a touchscreen is already deep into the iPad if they like Apple products. The Mac will stay around as a very low sales workhorse primarily in professional areas (FCPX, Logic Pro) and for iOS and macOS code development.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jezbd1997
the truth is the last bit "and a dongle?" is quite funny

though, the "tablet/laptop/tablet" joke, let's see how many times can do that before the cheap plastic hinges crack!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
cb060805d_lr.jpg

from 2005
 
Apple was "tiny and unknown" ten years ago? Seriously?
Apple’s sales of the mac in the two years prior to those ads 3.29 and 4.53 million. The year after the end of the campaign, they sold 13.66 million. So, yeah, their Mac sales were tiny and those ads helped to introduce people who had no idea what a Mac was to the Mac as the retail movement was underway to put Macs closer to the populace. Is Intel hoping to introduce people to… the same computers they’ve been using?

I think the ad campaign is a nice “Hey, Intel is doing this wacky thing!” social media hot take that will get Intel a lot of eyes… but virtually everyone seeing the ad ALREADY has an Intel PC and know what it can and can’t do. That wasn’t true for Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167
I'm sorry but Apple ruined the big advantage they had...
Bootcamp is dead, I went back to the PC and will not go back anymore I done with Apple.
Except for the message boards because they’re STILL the coolest message boards in tech. Can’t give THAT up! :)
 
Can anyone really say this advertisement is wrong?

Because it's not. It's 100% accurate. Regardless of the actor.

Anyone that's using Mac knows this is accurate.

You don't need 56 accessories to use a 2 in 1 laptop.

Fact.
Funny how people bring up dongles for any new Macs with USB C. Why not just buy new cables? Most accessories do not have the USB cable attached these days and you can get USB C cables for dirt cheap on Amazon.

It's also funny when Apple got rid of legacy I/O with the original iMac, people complained for a bit but then realized Apple was in the right for switching to new technology. People need to move on and get with the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
And why Intel? Microsoft is like, we know better.
I don’t know who is giving Intel such bad advice, they are the dominant force in computer chips by far. This makes them look weak. Why?
 
Funniest part.. any gaming laptop worth it's salt isn't good because "Intel".. it's good because "nVidia".
Exactly! There's a few Ryzen/Nvidia laptops out there that perform very well and I suppose some Intel ones too. What makes even less sense is that Intel seem to be pushing portable form factors, where a lower TDP makes more sense, like, again, some of the Ryzen CPUs do and obviously the M1 does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rp2011
To me I much prefer to have multiple devices that do different things than one device tries to cover different tasks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: archer75
If gaming is your deciding factor for choosing a computer, by all means — buy your Windows super-gamer. Leave the cool-running, long-lived, easy-to-maintain, virus-free Macs for the rest of us
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: ani4ani
He’s an actor who collects a check after reading a script. I hope you’re kidding
Yes he’s an actor but actors know full well when you flip to a competitor and name the company you’ve previously worked for... that‘s a no go. Why would Apple ever use him again? It’s about adding business, not gaining one while losing another. That‘s not one builds a portfolio for future income In a filed like acting.
 
Can anyone really say this advertisement is wrong?

Because it's not. It's 100% accurate. Regardless of the actor.

Anyone that's using Mac knows this is accurate.

You don't need 56 accessories to use a 2 in 1 laptop.

Fact.
Yep, it's accurate. iPads and dongles don't make sense to anyone but Apple, who's collecting money for them. Would still rather have just the Mac, but if I needed stylus capabilities, I might not make the same decision.

The only inaccuracy is "it has Intel, nice!" The "nice" part I mean.
 
Last edited:
Can anyone really say this advertisement is wrong?

Because it's not. It's 100% accurate. Regardless of the actor.

Anyone that's using Mac knows this is accurate.

You don't need 56 accessories to use a 2 in 1 laptop.

Fact.
If you're gonna end your post with "fact" you should consider not to exaggerate. For instance... "54 accessories." Please don't be that guy. Have a nice day. :)
 
Funny how people bring up dongles for any new Macs with USB C. Why not just buy new cables? Most accessories do not have the USB cable attached these days and you can get USB C cables for dirt cheap on Amazon.

It's also funny when Apple got rid of legacy I/O with the original iMac, people complained for a bit but then realized Apple was in the right for switching to new technology. People need to move on and get with the future.
No, USB-C is really only useful for adapting to other ports currently. You know what's ironic, I just bought a USB-C keyboard and mouse, and still neither came with a USB-C-to-C cable in the box. Only C-to-A. If I didn't have USB-A ports, I'd have to buy more cables. But that'd make sense even if everyone had USB-C-capable laptops: even if you want to use USB-C ports, it's very expensive to get more of them once you run out.

Monitors also almost never take USB-C. Great when they do. I like having a monitor as a hub, but those are expensive rn. DP and HDMI adapters are always flaky. Good thing Apple is bringing back HDMI!

They need to make USB-C "splitters" (ik they're technically something else but you know what I mean) ubiquitous, fix all the incompatibilities caused by protocol mismatch, and put USB-C on devices like monitors. It'll happen with time. Not today.
 
Last edited:
Ugh...that seems desperate on both Justin & Intel's part.

EDIT: I get that he's just making a living; so are the folks at Intel.

My point with Justin's flip-flopping is that seems desperate (like when the Verizon spokesperson moved to Sprint; it is hard to tell if the move is genuine in those scenarios.). I have nothing against Justin Long - may he have a long and flourishing career!!!

Um, you're point doesn't make sense. Flip-flopping? How is he flip-flopping? He's doing the EXACT SAME THING he did before - get paid to act in a commercial. Come on man, be smarter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.