Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Big thumbs down to MR for this headline and even bigger thumbs down to everyone that is dissing Justin. The guy is an actor who gets paid for work like this, trying to make him a scapegoat in this situation is absolutely immoral and entirely hypocritical.

I don't see what's wrong with the headline or how you think MR is trying to scapegoat JL?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Lol and it has nothing to do with Intel chips :D tough times at Intel😂

I feel pretty confident intel makes the bulk of their cash selling their chips to manufactures (acer, Asus, dell, etc.). They want to push the windows laptop because your average consumer doesn't know much about chips outside of "powered by intel".
 
I am really curious about the M1 chip and I while im ready to rock a new MBP this fall or even a new Mini right now all the bad press along w a few friends who own one and that are not happy at all due to the many compatibility issues along w the rumored ssd flaws makes me hesitant. Would love & appreciate some opinions from this forum. Thanks!

The main compatibility issue is if you're a developer and depend on VMs. In that case, don't get an M1 - it doesn't support this, and never will. Apple is severing ties with the rest of the IT world, compatibility wise. There are gains, and there are losses.

Also, if you are a developer and want to be effective running x86 docker images etc... you're probably also better off not getting an M1.

If you are a general purpose user doing a little bit of everything, but not a lot of development for non-Apple-platforms then M1 is great. E.g. the MacBook Air with great performance, great battery life and no fans is something I'd love if I didn't need the VMs.
 
Who buys a laptop based on the „Intel“ branding though? I bet most people don’t even know what that means and buy whatever brand they like. Even Apple just happens to have M1 chips now. I don’t think the „I don’t understand the difference between office and word“ people care about M1 or Intel either. They just want a [new] Mac
 
What part of actors are paid to lie don't you get.

And how many really, really good paying jobs in your profession do you turn down? I'm sure Intel made it worth is while. There is nothing wrong with Justin, but some people need to move back into the reality zone.
Most people just need to stop being fanboys. As if Apple really cares about any of them when it comes to anything but their wallet. It's pathetic.
 
Intel really need to focus on challenging AMDs emerging dominance, otherwise nobody will game or work on an Intel anyway - they can hardly compete with them on the low to mid end as it stands and AMD APU laptops are so much better than Intels already.

The M1 is currently a different class of CPU (x86 rather than ARM is the standard on laptop and desktops), and it will remain so for awhile - more bad decisions from Intel.
 
For what they are, the adverts are well-done. Justin has lost some of my respect, and his coolness with it. Having said so it's not a bad move by Intel. In 5 seconds, they find some weakness of the Mac (like the toolbar) and exploit it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
I thought the Intel ads were mildly amusing. But I don't understand the push for touch screens on a PC.

Touch screen on a tablet or phone makes sense. Touch is what the mobile OS, apps and actual product were designed & optimised for.

Touch screen on a PC is a horrible experience and it's never ever worked well on Windows 10 as hardly any of the apps are optimised for touch, including Windows 10 itself and all of Microsoft's core enterprise & office applications. I've yet to find a web browser that works well with touch too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Lol and it has nothing to do with Intel chips :D tough times at Intel😂
And that tells you that they are more concerned about protecting the x86 architecture's dominance in the PC market than they are about competition by AMD.

But the reactions in this thread are priceless. When Apple does it, it's cute. When Intel does it, it's desperate. ;)
 
Mot really. It is a fair comparison since M1 has only 2 variants... the one in the base MacBook Air and the once powering the rest. Until other variants launch, it's the best CPU made by Apple and competes directly win the very best of Intel's 11th Gen Core and AMD's Ryzen Mobile 5xxx SKU's.
That does not make it a fair comparison. This is Apple’s slowest CPU. This is like saying it’s a fair comparison to make with a Samsung NVME vs SATA SSD since the SATA is newer. The M1 is not in the same class as the i7 or i9.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Intel really need to focus on challenging AMDs emerging dominance, otherwise nobody will game or work on an Intel anyway - they can hardly compete with them on the low to mid end as it stands and AMD APU laptops are so much better than Intels already.

The M1 is currently a different class of CPU (x86 rather than ARM is the standard on laptop and desktops), and it will remain so for awhile - more bad decisions from Intel.

Emerging? Uh, no. AMD is long past that. It's been a few years that AMD has been spanking Intel.
 
LOL........ 🤣

meanwhile Intel is getting spanked by both Apple, and AMD in terms of performance.

give it up Intel, your days are done. Just sell your chip business to Apple.

also, there’s a reason Apple never made a touch screen Mac and they will never will to protect Steve Job’s legacy:
still holds up...also finger prints on a laptop screen.... and the interfaces is not designed for fingers vs mouse....its never going to be amazing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.