Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I plan to ask for a full refund. Bought my 2017 MBP at the end of March. If they are truly not replacing defective keyboards with the fixed version, which was released just a few months after I got mine, then I want my money back. That is terrible customer service.
 
I really don't see how Apple under Steve Jobs was any different, to be honest. If anything, under him Apple was even more arrogant and, actually, made more mistakes.

I don’t mean to over-simplify and just point to Tim for all these mistakes. One person can only create and impact so much change.

However, I do feel like innovation is not where it once was for Apple under Steve, and I think that piece really does come from having a leader who is more savvy with the operational and logistics-side than someone who really was just a born innovator. The iPhone X is a really great product, but the general consensus isn’t what it once was for iPhones, etc, and I think that’s really because innovation has stalled in many regards.

Their approach to this keyboard debacle has been less than ideal, particularly with the length of time for them to admit a problem and now for them to essentially be lying to publications that they didn’t fix the problem in the 3rd gen, while their patent clearly contradicts this. That is something that starts and ends with leadership.
 
The tech industry as a whole is hitting a stagnant point of practical innovation. Sure, there are experimental concepts and what not but most of those are never practical on a mass scale. Everything done under the Steve Jobs era was innovative because there was nothing like it, and there were very few real competing brands in those markets. Each corner of the tech market now is so saturated with consumer options that are the same rehashed design/ideas, with one or two minor differences here or there that make no significant impact.

What is really left to do that would be a world-changing practical innovation in 2018? That's for the world's geniuses to figure out, but I think most consumers complaining about a lack of innovation would be hard-pressed to suggest an idea of a real practical innovation.
 
Its possible some people got them, but then Apple changed, revised or clarified their policy. I believe time will tell, but I think Apple's words cary a lot of weight in this situation
I don’t think Apple is going to be replacing these keyboards with the the new 2018 model anyways. As you have said, Apple has already been quoted saying that the 2018 keyboards are exclusive to the 2018 machines, and technically speaking this makes since. The new top cases for the 2018 MBPs have larger batteries, new True Tone Touchbars, and according to some users it sounds like they have new speakers.

It is possible that Apple will update the manufacturing specs down the road for their 2016-17 topcase part replacements to include the new keyboard design with the protective membrane, but honestly I’d be doubtful of that. It isn’t really like them to do that, as you said in your example of the 2011 GPU fiasco. Or in the case of Staingate, for which all models up to 2017 still are at risk of and part of a repair program too.
[doublepost=1531754212][/doublepost]
I plan to ask for a full refund. Bought my 2017 MBP at the end of March. If they are truly not replacing defective keyboards with the fixed version, which was released just a few months after I got mine, then I want my money back. That is terrible customer service.
Let us know how that goes!
[doublepost=1531754942][/doublepost]
The tech industry as a whole is hitting a stagnant point of practical innovation. Sure, there are experimental concepts and what not but most of those are never practical on a mass scale. Everything done under the Steve Jobs era was innovative because there was nothing like it, and there were very few real competing brands in those markets. Each corner of the tech market now is so saturated with consumer options that are the same rehashed design/ideas, with one or two minor differences here or there that make no significant impact.

What is really left to do that would be a world-changing practical innovation in 2018? That's for the world's geniuses to figure out, but I think most consumers complaining about a lack of innovation would be hard-pressed to suggest an idea of a real practical innovation.
Well said! I completely agree, I’m no genius, but right now the technology that I am able to get from Apple far exceeds my needs in terms of practical innovation, as you have said. And I would agree this applies to most everyone. People are nostalgic on the innovation and tech advancements that we saw under Steve Jobs, but that truly was a different era in technology... that’s when laptops were a whole 1 1/2 inches thick; a laptop with 2 hour battery life was considered amazing; phones were still “dumb”, and we still were still listening to our music on CDs... I mean look at today, we have phones, heck we even have watches with chips more powerful than yesterday’s computer. We can tell our math teachers of yesterday that they were wrong about us not ever having a calculator always with us. Lol

Sorry for the lengthy reply, but I guess I come from a perspective of being grateful for what technologies we have now. We could still be using floppy disks y’all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artfossil
What do you mean? I'm still in my first year of use for my MBP 2017 and I'm so sad about that. Is there any chance to give refund in order to buy a new one?
 
My 2016 keyboard was replaced for the second time about three weeks ago, it is still loud, there is no way it is a 2018. While they are very similar, you notice a difference in sound and softness in the keys.
 
What do you mean? I'm still in my first year of use for my MBP 2017 and I'm so sad about that. Is there any chance to give refund in order to buy a new one?
Is it less than 6 months old and is the keyboard malfunctioning?

My sense is that it’s manager’s discretion but those factors were mentioned several times.
 
I believe future variations may utilise MagLev technology similar to some of Dells 2018 XPS notebooks, which happened to use the butterfly mechanism. That would be directed at the complaints with keyboard travel and loudness, while being technically more durable.

Nice to know someone out there is actually paying attention to human factors, vs Apple's just saying "our new keyboards have very little tactile feedback -- deal with it". What would be really interesting is if the maglev keyboard allowed one to adjust the feel of the keys to suit the individual user.

But all this begs the question: is it really worth it to gimp the keyboard on a laptop (and/or jump through crazy engineering hoops to fix them) just for the sake of a 1mm savings in thickness?
 
Last edited:
I think they made it clear in the news thread.

Disagree. I don’t think it was clear at all. We’re on a site call MacRumors. Things reported are often speculation from the rumor mill, preliminary or tentative, and subject to change.

When I hear “MacRumors has learned” I think, learned from whom? A well-placed source? Within Apple? A known-reliable source? An insider in Apple engineering? A Genius Bar technician? An AppleCare Rep? An Apple Authorized Service Provider? A source familiar with the matter? Or maybe an Apple spokesperson authorized to speak on the record?

Typically a source is attributed. If this is fact, simply state it: An Apple spokesperson said. This was an apparently anonymous source. If it’s not coming from official channels, label it as such.

But to just say “MacRumors has learned” in no way tells the reader that this is an official policy. The source—whoever they may be—may be right or wrong.
 
Yeah, saw that. Still doesn't make much logical sense.

It still can be the case that they are retrofitting just the membrane to the 2017 version and that's what they are using for both 2017 and 2016 models. And from anecdotes it is clear that nobody is getting the original 2016 keyboard as replacement in their 2016 models - at least 2017 keyboard.

Actually, it should make complete sense.

So far, Apple:
  1. Claims a "small percentage" of MacBook and MacBook Pro exhibit keyboard problems.
  2. Claims the Gen 3 keyboard "wasn’t designed to solve those issues."
  3. Insists that the keyboard issues have only affected a tiny fraction of its user base.

Apple doesn't believe it's a problem, period. Why are people doing all sorts of mental gymnastics to try to believe the 2016/2017 will receive Gen 3 keyboards?
 
Actually, it should make complete sense.

So far, Apple:
  1. Claims a "small percentage" of MacBook and MacBook Pro exhibit keyboard problems.
  2. Claims the Gen 3 keyboard "wasn’t designed to solve those issues."
  3. Insists that the keyboard issues have only affected a tiny fraction of its user base.

Apple doesn't believe it's a problem, period. Why are people doing all sorts of mental gymnastics to try to believe the 2016/2017 will receive Gen 3 keyboards?

Apple knows it is a problem. You are confusing PR spin with reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
My 2016 keyboard was replaced for the second time about three weeks ago, it is still loud, there is no way it is a 2018. While they are very similar, you notice a difference in sound and softness in the keys.

there is no way, 3 weeks ago, that you had any chance of getting a 2018 keyboard. People are just now getting there 2018s. If Apply decides to apply the revision to the 2016/2017 it will only be "now" that people could even possibly get one - if Apple decide to grace us with such generosity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eagerwu
Way more important: the weight of the characters seem thicker on the new keyboard. Also: updated Option key symbol.
 
Nice to know someone out there is actually paying attention to human factors, vs Apple's just saying "our new keyboards have very little tactile feedback -- deal with it". What would be really interesting is if the maglev keyboard allowed one to adjust the feel of the keys to suit the individual user.

But all this begs the question: is it really worth it to gimp the keyboard on a laptop (and/or jump through crazy engineering hoops to fix them) just for the sake of a 1mm savings in thickness?
That would be cool, but everybody who wanted to change it would change it to the best feeling/feeling of most travel so there wouldn't be much point. Also the differences wouldn't be that noticeable. Part of the keyboard was obviously the thickness, which in the long term is a good approach if they could get it to a good standard, which I would say they have only really got it to now. It is now at the point where it potentially not so divisive. The problem was that they released it years before they got it there (which no doubt would have taken weeks/months if they hadn't released it first). The same is true for a lot of things they do nowadays. The approach they have currently is to stick with the mechanism and, as you say, jump through engineering hoops to get it to where they want it to be. A keyboard that was intended to be simpler is becoming a lot more convoluted. Having said that, the silicon barrier is a good addition in general, and one that is here to stay.
 
According to AppleInsider’s data, keyboard failure rates for the last 4 model years of MBP are as follows:

2014 5.6%
2015 6.0%
2016 11.8%
2017 8.2%

The 2016 keyboard has nearly twice the failure rate as 2015. Not good. It was modified for 2017 and the effect of the redesign is apparent. Is 8.2% still too high? Yes, so Apple modified it again and we now have a third generation.

Only time will tell whether they’ll be successful in bringing that 8.2 number down even further.

I saw those numbers too. One question though. Are those fail-rates within the first year of purchasing? Because if not, then that isn't a fair assessment.

Think about it, the 2014 MBP's keyboards have been out there for 4 years now. A 5.6% fail rate within 4 years of life isn't bad. 6.0% for 3 years on the 2015... 11.8% for the 2016s within 2 years. And 8.2% for the 2017 in only a year?

Maybe those rates are for failure within the first year... But if not, it really does show that the 2016 and 2017 models are truly bad and that the 2017 MBP's keyboard might not be much more reliable than the 2016 in the long run.

Edit: Nevermind. I should've actually read the article. It does state that these are warranty services provided within the first year. Need my morning coffee... Please disregard my entire post. :confused:
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU and eagerwu
I saw those numbers too. One question though. Are those fail-rates within the first year of purchasing? Because if not, then that isn't a fair assessment.

Think about it, the 2014 MBP's keyboards have been out there for 4 years now. A 5.6% fail rate within 4 years of life isn't bad. 6.0% for 3 years on the 2015... 11.8% for the 2016s within 2 years. And 8.2% for the 2017 in only a year?

Maybe those rates are for failure within the first year... But if not, it really does show that the 2016 and 2017 models are truly bad and that the 2017 MBP's keyboard might not be much more reliable than the 2016 in the long run.

Edit: Nevermind. I should've actually read the article. It does state that these are warranty services provided within the first year. Need my morning coffee... Please disregard my entire post. :confused:

We can look at repair statistics night and day from different providers with different methodologies - but two things we can definitely say are:

1) We have never saw such a backlash about keyboard issues prior to 2016. If anything, we would always tout MacBook keyboards as being so superior compared to all the alternatives, similar to the touch pad.
2) There is no repair programme for keyboards prior to 2016, so it is reasonable to conclude they were more reliable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
I don’t mean to over-simplify and just point to Tim for all these mistakes. One person can only create and impact so much change.

However, I do feel like innovation is not where it once was for Apple under Steve, and I think that piece really does come from having a leader who is more savvy with the operational and logistics-side than someone who really was just a born innovator. The iPhone X is a really great product, but the general consensus isn’t what it once was for iPhones, etc, and I think that’s really because innovation has stalled in many regards.

Their approach to this keyboard debacle has been less than ideal, particularly with the length of time for them to admit a problem and now for them to essentially be lying to publications that they didn’t fix the problem in the 3rd gen, while their patent clearly contradicts this. That is something that starts and ends with leadership.


Remember when Steve released an iPhone that didn't work when you held it in your hand
Remember when Steve released the Cube
Remember when Steve released Ping

Good times
 
We can look at repair statistics night and day from different providers with different methodologies - but two things we can definitely say are:

1) We have never saw such a backlash about keyboard issues prior to 2016. If anything, we would always tout MacBook keyboards as being so superior compared to all the alternatives, similar to the touch pad.
2) There is no repair programme for keyboards prior to 2016, so it is reasonable to conclude they were more reliable.

Point 1 means nothing anymore. Everyone is outraged about something right now.
 
It appears to have been deleted?
I can see it here. Maybe the mods have to approve it in /r/Apple before others can see it? In the mean time, this is super ugly but here's a page screenshot of the post: https://imgur.com/a/TpbADXa

I am in Australia, too. Do we have any remedy through the Consumer Law?
I'll find out tomorrow when ACCC/NSW Fair Trading phone lines are open for me to get their legal advice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pubmsu
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.