It does look kinda cheap, doesn’t it? I know it’s probably not plastic, but the bezels look kinda plasticky.Looks like a toy watch you would throw inside a piñata 🤣 At least it should make some kids very happy![]()
It looks like Luigi Colani got up from his grave just to do one final bad "design" with more curves than sense.
![]()
![]()
It is a smartwatch, some things come with that standard. I wouldn't say they copied the Apple Watch. Apple didn't invent the smart watch.Wow, let's just take everything from the Apple Watch and just make it round. No attempt to even try make it different
What a shockingly terrible design, lol. Seriously, how is this in any way competitive? Right. It's not. It will just be super cheap because you are the product.
It really does, doesn’t it? I couldn’t put my finger on it, but it totally looks like a thermostat!Looks like a nest thermostat with wrist straps.
yes indeed the Japanese looks strange - the phrase you quote doesn't have any Kana, it really looks like Chinese.So much happier with the Ultra.
FYI, if you have a M1 Mac or iOS device and don't know Japanese, you can translate that text by just highlighting it.
睡眠状態中心拍数乞追跡 = "Sleep state central beat begging"
Jeez those bezels are THICC
Round is a good design for a digital watch if it is only a watch. The challenge is once you get past the face and try to use it to display information you wind up with a lot of empty space or really odd looking ones. In addition, given the size limitations for a round face watch’s diameter, text has to be really small or you only see snippets and must scroll forever.
That would be poor human factor design, IMHO. Either it is very small area, making it hard to use, or so big you accidentally tap it. They could build it into the side off the casing, or as a bezel, but that would mean every time you touched the case, even accidentally, it would react; or you have a largish bezel around the face.
In addition, rather than being able to do things by feel such as push a button you’d need to look at the watch to ensure you get the desired response.
And there are some great looking square watches, too. I kinda wish Apple would do a bit more with square face design, even if it cannibalizes sales of the Apple Watch Hermes (which does a good job of offering stylish square faces).round is optimal, if you have a movement with wheels and analogue hands - and despite that rectangular watches have been around for long (look at the Jaeger leCoultre Reverso, the Tag Heuer Monaco, the Patek Philippe Gondolo, etc. etc.).
Now for a digital display that is a completely different situation - and I would say rounded rectangle comes quite natural there ...
Options are good for watch faces. I have watch hands on mine sometimes when I want the look. Still has complications with data around itRound watches are so 20th century. Smart watches should be square and never, ever have a simple watch face on them. They’re far too powerful for something as mundane as watch hands - put data and information on the face. It’s a smart watch, after all.
Apple might notice this by revision 3. There is no chance at all that Apple will pay this any attention at all. It’s not going to impact Apple Watch sales in the slightest. I’d love to see the impact that Samsung’s watches have on Apple, I doubt those give Apple much concern. This, won’t even be on the radar at the moment.It's a marketing maneuver/dynamic. This will kick Apple watch up a step in gotta have ism game. That's good and bad for Apple - post is it's going to be a whole lotta more watches out there.
Yeah--I'm not sure why that would be embarrassing either. I've worn mine to weddings, funerals, and everything in between. I always buy the black model, so I can dress it up with my black metal link bracelet if I need to. I usually change it to a dressier mono-color face too.Maybe I am weird but I wouldn't be embarrassed to have an Apple Watch on in a wedding photo.