For the average person a MacBook is still a strong consideration with this iMac only really boasting an decent 24” monitor.
This is a very astute point.
The 13" MB{A,P} lines use the same basic processor & GPU.
So all you get from this, is a screen thats 2.7x the size while maintaining PPI, two additional USB-C ports, and an Ethernet port.
It's
almost like the differentiator between entry model laptops and entry model desktops is that one is very portable and the other has a bigger screen and more ports.. WHAT A ****ING SURPRISE THAT IS.
300 gets you a 4K 27”‘from dell.
Yep and it also gets you a PPI of 163. I guess if you don't care about picture quality, maybe that works fine for you.
If you ask smart or more tech savvy consumers
Oh this should be good.
with money left over for a separate 48" LG CX OLED TV as monitor
Wut? I've worked in the tech industry for pretty close to 20 years. In that time I've known
one person who
actually bought a TV to "use as a display", and he didn't
actually use it as a display. He bought it to use as a TV, and claimed it as a tax deduction "for work", because technically he could plug his computer into it and use it as a display.
In a similar way, you can turn a couch on end and climb up it. That doesn't make it a step ladder.
So what resolution is that display? For 40" you'd want 8K UHD or WHUXGA (~7680 x 4320 or 4800, depending on whether it's 16:9 or 16:10). For 48".. wow.. that'd have to be.. ~9200 by ~5700 or so...
Oh. It's a 4K panel. At 48"... so, 91PPI..... Thats um.... Good for you, I guess?