Name calling? Please re-read my post. I'm stating that the idea that Apple is expected to innovate every year is stupid and not worth arguing.
fair enough yes I see.
but if 1080p is a gimmick, 64bit is too
Name calling? Please re-read my post. I'm stating that the idea that Apple is expected to innovate every year is stupid and not worth arguing.
fair enough yes I see.
but if 1080p is a gimmick, 64bit is too
It's debatable. Nothing is really taking advantage of it right now true. Not sure if it was a main selling point for Apple either. With that said, Apple's products are going 64 Bit and are future proof. My guess is iOS 10 will be 64bit only and the iPhone 5s will be able to get that update.
1080p on a smartphone is a gimmick because the eyes can't even tell the difference. It's not useful now and it's not gonna be useful later.
It's debatable. Nothing is really taking advantage of it right now true. Not sure if it was a main selling point for Apple either. With that said, Apple's products are going 64 Bit and are future proof. My guess is iOS 10 will be 64bit only and the iPhone 5s will be able to get that update.
1080p on a smartphone is a gimmick because the eyes can't even tell the difference. It's not useful now and it's not gonna be useful later.
I cant agree on the 1080P point.
That's similar methodology to the claim that the eye can't see over 60FPS (or some claim 30). However, there is a big difference playing a shooter at 120FPS, regardless of any eye science.
Apple really needs to fix the so called Retina display in iPhone. I can easily discern the pixels on the iPhone 5s display, while I have a hard time seeing pixels with 1080p. No 1080p, no sale.
I doubt anyone will take this comment seriously.
Well, when laying in bet before sleep I often check calendar for the next day, set my alarm, read top news and go through my twitter feed and so on. Here the phone gets very close in a quite dark room, when laying sideways. I have to say that I can easily discern the pixels here. Not elsewhere and through the day, but it is something I notice after having used GS4.
++++++ this ^^^^^^^
I don't worship any company either....Apple has always been the best at blending hardware and software. But lately the competition has caught up to them. They really need a home run with the IP6 and not just copy the rest of the competition with a larger screen........
Well, when laying in bet before sleep I often check calendar for the next day, set my alarm, read top news and go through my twitter feed and so on. Here the phone gets very close in a quite dark room, when laying sideways. I have to say that I can easily discern the pixels here. Not elsewhere and through the day, but it is something I notice after having used GS4.
Ive been reading they need a HomeRun for the past two years yet the same guys in here who say that keep buying the new phones.
I dont feel they need a homerun. IMO all they have to do is make that 4.7" screen and those who say 4" is perfect(after the 3.5" was perfect), will not just say that 4.7" is perfect.
They WILL sell a ton of them but for me, they need to let the OS be more open for me to go back. I like choice and Apple dont give you many.
Easy there! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that Apple will not waste time on gimmicks. Using past history as a guide, I think it's pretty obvious.
Apple didn't get caught cheating on benchmark test. Samsung did. Apple's phone is faster. No need to fret. Samsung will get 'em next release. Cheer up!
I agree with this. I think a 5.5" or 5.7" phone being offered along side it would be the cherry on top. I'm hoping iOS 8 has some hidden surprises like Swype built into the keyboard, but I'm not gonna hold my breathe.
1080p on a smartphone is a gimmick because the eyes can't even tell the difference. It's not useful now and it's not gonna be useful later.
The swipe keyboard is something I'd like to see in iOS, and it's to the point now that they almost HAVE to add it. Windows Phone 8.1 added it, so now all Android phones and Windows phones have it. I'm sure that Apple could find a way to market it so that it appears to be their own innovation.![]()
4K will come when it makes sense and is mainstream. 1. It takes up too much space. 2. Unless you got the big bucks to buy a TV or monitor that can handle that type of content, its limited to your phone which your phone can't even enjoy the 4K video it can record because it's only 1080p display.
When 4K TV's are a reasonable price and mainstream, you have all those special moments in glorious 4K quality.
If current phonecam videos are anything to go by, I think you might have to make do without the "glorious" and the "quality", though.
Its called future proofing. You can record all those precious moments in 4K. You dont have to keep them on your phone, store them on a hard drive.
When 4K TV's are a reasonable price and mainstream, you have all those special moments in glorious 4K quality.
Now thats what I call forward thinking.
I doubt anyone will take this comment seriously.
I can sure as hell tell a difference between HD and FullHD on mobile phones, not to mention the screen on an iPhone which is even below HD. Quality being one thing, but the fact that you can squeeze in a lot more information on a FullHD screen makes the comparison a no-brainer. And when you compare a tiny 4" low resolution screen with a modern properly sized FullHD screen, well, you'd be insane to even make such a comparison. It's like comparing a black and white CRT TV to a modern flat screen.
And to rant on my pet peeve: 1080p is a video mode, indicating 1080 horizontal lines and progressive scan. The screen resolution commonly associated with such video is FullHD, i.e. 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Also, the human eye cannot discern resolution beyond 300 pixels per inch. And we exceed that. So the eye can't even see the difference. But the human eye can see big differences in color saturation and reproduction. In fact, I'd say that is even more important than resolution. So we decided to focus on that aspect instead.
I'll throw this out there:
MOTO X Engineer on Phone Specs
That leads me to the criticism about the screen resolution. Why did Motorola decide to go with a lower resolution? I mean, it seems like every other high-end smartphone, including the new LG G2 that was just introduced today, has a 1080P screen. And when it comes to pixels per square inch, the Galaxy S4 has the Moto X beat.
Arshad: First of all, what Samsung has done with the GS4 screen is not true 1080P. Instead, Samsung is using a PenTile display. Each pixel is made up of three-color sub pixels. It's missing one of the pixels. We are using a true RGB pattern custom display that gives true color reproduction without wasting battery life.
Samsung is using a graphics processor, but they're using it the wrong way and their performance is actually worse than ours. They are burning more battery life. In the case of HTC, they're using an LCD screen, which is simply an inferior technology.
Also, the human eye cannot discern resolution beyond 300 pixels per inch. And we exceed that. So the eye can't even see the difference. But the human eye can see big differences in color saturation and reproduction. In fact, I'd say that is even more important than resolution. So we decided to focus on that aspect instead.