That's the problem with ADSL and Cable.
It's not uncommon to see much lower actual transmission speeds than advertised.
I know of many in this situation.
Yes, many get less than what's advertised, but not *one tenth* of what's advertised.
He's infinitely more knowledgeable about his own Internet connection and what it can perform, and so you should trust his maths over your reading comprehension when it comes to his Internet connectivity (really, it's kind of difficult to get 4600/
X/60 wrong).
Far from everyone uses proper capitalization, so while there's no difference between "kbps and kb/sec" grammatically speaking, there's a world of difference in what's meant.
At the very least, I and others easily saw what he meant, whereas you're the only one who grossly misinterpreted his post (and I don't mean this as an attack on you).
Now, I probably overreacted -- but I just don't see how anyone can make the mistake you did when the time difference is so great.
You're right that throughput is measured in bits per second (or variations thereof), but you're seriously neglecting the part where every major client measures things in bytes per second (i.e., Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, Opera, FlashFXP, CyberDuck, Azureus/Vuze/whatever it's called these days, uTorrent).
In other words, it's
very easy to understand what the poster meant.
The problem with getting less than advertised has almost nothing to do with the actual technology used (be it FTTH, FTTC, DSL, Cable), but everything to do with oversubscription.
Sadly, it's common that the actual infrastructure is oversubscribed to the point where people rarely get the advertised speeds.
Japan's Internet connectivity is not under debate -- I think it's great that there's a lot of pioneering going on there, but there really is no need for you to go on about how throughput is sacred in Japan, whereas we in the west can't possibly consider it important. It's just as silly as the Americans beating their chests and proudly proclaiming they have the mightiest military force in the world, the French proclaiming their language is superior etc. etc.
In other words, while everyone rightly has something to be proud of, there's no need to go flaunting it or discounting everyone else.
What got this started was how long it would take to DL the iLife DVD suite. I would venture to say, that for many it will be hours of DL time provided that they have sustained throughput on their Internet connection.
For most Americans, I would agree (seeing how badly the lines are oversubscribed, and what the ISPs there consider to be good connectivity).
For most Europeans? Nope.
Despite the disheartening situation in the U.K., Europeans in general get what they pay for (thanks to customer protection laws), and anyone who'd consider downloading iLife rather than going to the store to buy a copy is likely to have at the very least a 8Mbps connection.
The days of a DVD taking hours to download are long gone, even here in the west.
Either way, it's a shame Apple don't offer iLife as a download option
