$$$$ my friend. They don't want you to stay on the 4, they want you to upgrade to the 7.
Why doesn't Apple just make iOS updating built in and not give the user a choice? It's going to happen someday.
That way Apple can use up all my data automatically. If Apple was smart they pay the carriers to allow iOS to download updates for free. Probably would get faster and more adoption.
Who is our devices? Why do you keep posting the stereotypical we? Are you implying that I'm not posting the truth and the people who notice a boost in performance are not posting the truth? Or is it anything Apple does, there is a negative spin on it.
What proof? Synthetic benchmarks or real world usage?What's with the hyperbole?
[doublepost=1487792293][/doublepost]
There is enough proof to show iOS 9 is faster than iOS 8, that's all the proof I need.
As far as android, android devices from 2012 aren't getting updates, iOS devices are. Nor are android devices in the latest versions of the operating system from 5 years ago.
It's simpler than that--it's not really about much of any of that and more about the supposed only conclusion that is being drawn about this being some sort of a planned obsolescence conspiracy while only having conjectures and correlations to support it without any actual proof, and at the same time consistently overlooking anything else plausible that might be playing a role if it doesn't fit in with the conspiracy hypothesis.
There are also those whose devices were made faster.The "we" are the customers who got their devices crippled by Apple's updates. There are quite a few of them in this thread itself.iPhone 6 feels horrible on iOS 10 compared to how it was on iOS 8
Real world usage like my devices. One anecdotal post is just like another and doesn't go to prove anything.What proof? Synthetic benchmarks or real world usage?
Do they get the latest operating system? Is POTUS phone fully up to date and patched with the latest 2017 o/s? Nobody on iOS is forced into upgrading, all you get is a notice that can be ignored.All Android devices from 2012 are getting updates via Google Play Services just like iOS devices. You refuse to even try to understand that comparing Apple and Google's updates policy is comparing apples and oranges. Many people on Android didn't want their device slow down so they have happily downgraded and that "fragmented" chart reflects that. That chart reflects customer choice unlike the iOS chart where people have been forced into upgrading
My iPhone 6 doesn't stutter on iOS 10.What noteworthy features does iOS 9 have over 8 that caused iPhone 6 to stutter on even minor animations?
As usual, what does that deflection have to do with what I commented on?What noteworthy features does iOS 9 have over 8 that caused iPhone 6 to stutter on even minor animations?
No, it's security, not money.
If they allowed that, crooks would simply downgrade phones to get around security bugs.
I can think of at least a few Android updates that killed battery life for me.All for that beautiful marketing chart. I bet if they removed the percentage of devices which struggle with running iOS 10 we would have half the percentage that chart shows. At least the Android devices retain their speed when they are EOL
In addition that 1% running Nougat are the real flagship Android users and the percentage of flagships running Nougat would match the iOS chart
I can think of at least a few Android updates that killed battery life for me.
Droid Razr Gingerbread -> ICS: horrid battery drain that was never resolved.
Nexus 5 KitKat -> Lollipop: again huge battery drain in the Lollipop betas was never resolved, Android L launched with absolute abysmal battery life. I've never had and iOS update do anything to that scale. The already meh battery life of the Nexus 5 went to damn near unusable.
Agreed. I got the iPhone 6 in January 2015 and I was not at all impressed with it's speed, or lack thereof. The 6S was very very noticeably faster when it came out, almost shockingly so.The 6 plus has always been laggy
[doublepost=1487818186][/doublepost]
Your last point can only be a fortuitous side-effect (to Cook et al).Yes, he did a good job of explaining the difference. iOS updates are totally different animals from the decentralized Android updates.
...
One probable reason why Apple doesn't allow downloading apps separately from the App Store, is because the download counters would give away a lot of info.
Imagine if the Apple Watch app hadn't been part of an iOS update, but had to be downloaded from the Apple App Store. It would've been much easier for observers to note about how many Watches were being sold each quarter!
I'm depressed now, as this just reminds me that Apple no longer names their OSX OSes after felines. That, and sad for Atari too, although I think they only ever had Panther and JaguarBut..but...their OS updates are named after delicious things!
Guys, Android is NOT like iOS, where you have to have the latest version to get many useful features.
So when I can do everything I need to on my "old" OS (and more than I can on iOS), I see no (desperate) reason to upgrade.
And these iOS graphs mean nothing when Apple basically "forces" you to upgrade, and prohibits downgrading after a while.
You would prefer an Apple monopoly in the smartphone/tablet market?
Can you image how much more money they would hose customers if they had no competition to keep them check? $1000 for the base model easily. $2000 for the high end.I, for one, like competition.
Guys, Android is NOT like iOS, where you have to have the latest version to get many useful features.
So when I can do everything I need to on my "old" OS (and more than I can on iOS), I see no (desperate) reason to upgrade.
And these iOS graphs mean nothing when Apple basically "forces" you to upgrade, and prohibits downgrading after a while.
Hard to be impressed when your device tricks you into upgrading through random popup reminders./QUOTE]
This! Apple is constantly making it harder and more unpleasant for the user to stay on older versions of the OS. Very nasty, unpleasant practice.
Upgrading, even if it's free, can still have woes. Some people here have reported performance issues. Those with mission critical operations, or otherwise use their devices as part of their jobs can experience disruptions from these updates, so they may be better off not updating. Other cases, they make changes to layout, workflows, etc. that may not jive with some users.One of the major reasons why they want you to upgrade is that it's more secure that everyone has the latest version of everything. The person still on the old code base becomes a vulnerability to everyone else and themselves. Especially on android where there are so many security holes it's not even funny.
But this is planet earth where people only care about what's good for themselves, so it's understandable that you don't care about upgrading because you probably don't care about the wider benefit to everyone else.
My Wii only got one update IIRC, but it was pretty solid for what I used it for.And I find it hilarious that lots of people on this thread feel it's somehow negative to have the latest version of a piece of software. The rest of us are thanksful that companies even bother with updates after they've got your money. In many other consumer electronics products you never get fixes for anything after they've got your cash.
That doesn't invalidate our opinion. For us planned obsolescence exists and for me Apple's smartphones are the only one which slow down every year. Just look at the pathetic state of the Air 2. Can't keep more than 6 apps in memoryThere are also those whose devices were made faster.
And in real world usage iPad Mini was crippled by Apple since iOS 8. So was iPhone 5 and iPhone 4sReal world usage like my devices. One anecdotal post is just like another and doesn't go to prove anything.
Google has decoupled parts of the new operating system so that 99% of what you get in a "new" iOS Update is available on Android through Play ServicesDo they get the latest operating system?
Is POTUS phone fully up to date and patched with the latest 2017 o/s? Nobody on iOS is forced into upgrading, all you get is a notice that can be ignored.
Mine does. It's going to be an iPad Mini on iOS 11. May probably sell it off this year. If Apple brings out the 64 gig OLED iPhone for 999 it would serve its purpose by recouping some of the cost because otherwise it would be a paperweight thanks to the atrocious lag everywhereMy iPhone 6 doesn't stutter on iOS 10.
It sure does kills the entire discussion. There is plenty of grousing on the Alternatives forum about lag on new Samsung phones; does that mean they engage in the same? Hint: must be.That doesn't invalidate our opinion. For us planned obsolescence exists and for me Apple's smartphones are the only one which slow down every year. Just look at the pathetic state of the Air 2. Can't keep more than 6 apps in memory
Nope, can find posters, who liked IOS 9 and my ipad works fine.And in real world usage iPad Mini was crippled by Apple since iOS 8. So was iPhone 5 and iPhone 4s
You don't get an operating system update, it's the 1% that counts.Google has decoupled parts of the new operating system so that 99% of what you get in a "new" iOS Update is available on Android through Play Services
Not according to the article you posted and I quoted. I'll dig it out if necessary. POTUS phone is a security risk.All system apps and security fixes are fully up to date on the POTUS phone. Some security issues aren't patched but as a tradeoff the device must be running just as good as the day he bought it which is why he likes the device. This is NOT planned obsolescence as the customer is enjoying the device like it was on Day 1 4 years later
That's not what you said, apple "forced" you to upgrade. I am able to never accept the upgrade, period.I did an experiment by not updating my iPhone 6 beyond 10.0 and once Apple was 2 versions ahead on 10.2 Apple kept nagging me to update EVERY SINGLE atone I unlocked the phone were I have to tap "Dismiss" to remove the prompt. It also downloaded the update in the background even when I didn't want to.
An anecdotal experience does not translate into a broad, sweeping generalization of the masses.Mine does. It's going to be an iPad Mini on iOS 11. May probably sell it off this year. If Apple brings out the 64 gig OLED iPhone for 999 it would serve its purpose by recouping some of the cost because otherwise it would be a paperweight thanks to the atrocious lag everywhere
fairly easy to disable that pop-up... i'll be sticking to 9.3.5 until they kick me out...Proof that extremely annoying and persistent nag screens work. Bummer. That only feeds Apple's cause to continue doing it forever. I wonder how many people would have "downgraded" to iOS 10 if they could have turned that nagging off for good.
But at the same time statistically insignificant anecdotal numbers don't really show much one way or another.I don't believe those figures. Statistics are always bent to show what they want you to think.
80% of my household are not on ios 10
You might experience some issues here and there and there might certainly be others, but it doesn't mean there's a conspiracy behind it. It's certainly a hypothesis that you can (and seemingly do) have, but that's essentially all it is.That doesn't invalidate our opinion. For us planned obsolescence exists and for me Apple's smartphones are the only one which slow down every year. Just look at the pathetic state of the Air 2. Can't keep more than 6 apps in memory