You have to be weak hands not to be able to hold it as shown.
I gave up being weak hands a long time ago. Now I go by AngerDanger.
You have to be weak hands not to be able to hold it as shown.
Is this a generation of whining? As a developer I have to carry a laptop, a phone, oh the horrors. I bought a bag to carry them all. My shoulder and neck are strained with the extra 5 lbs.
I have heard this quite a bit since the iPad Pro's introduction so I have two serious questions for everyone in the OS X on the iPad camp:
1. What would be the benefit of running Mac OS X?
2. What apps would you like to run that there isn't already an optimized iOS equivalent available?
Everyone has their own opinions and usage patterns, but my answer to your questions are:
1. No benefit at all. The iPad is optimized for what it does. If I want a very portable Mac OS machine, I'll get one of the new MacBooks.
2. I am a computer programmer, and there are a TON of things I do on Mac OS that I cannot do on my iPad. Even if Apple keeps focusing on making the iPad more and more "pro", it will be many years before it can replace everything I do.
That being said, I love my iPad, and I use it for different things. When I am not working, I probably spend 10x more time with my iPad than my Mac.
I have heard this quite a bit since the iPad Pro's introduction so I have two serious questions for everyone in the OS X on the iPad camp:
1. What would be the benefit of running Mac OS X?
2. What apps would you like to run that there isn't already an optimized iOS equivalent available?
I think that iOS can be the future of computing, but apple is taking a very slow bottom up approach to change how people interact with computers, and unfortunately that means they will only be useful for light tasks like email/docs/web for the time being.
How about terminal for a start and system activity finder disk utility. Listen if you cant get root access on your device without jailbreaking whats the point of owning a unix machine.
The people who create the software you run on your iOS devices for one...Who cares? What is important is that the OS works and supports the user, not that is follows a 50 year old api some nerds created. Many things changed in this time...
If you want all of that and you want ultra portability of an 13" screen BUY THE MACBOOK. Its not like Apple doesn't provide any device with OSX anymore and they focus only on iOS !How about terminal for a start and system activity finder disk utility. Listen if you cant get root access on your device without jailbreaking whats the point of owning a unix machine.
The people who create the software you run on your iOS devices for one...
Still hard to swallow the price tag IMO.
We've come to expect that bigger versions of iOS devices (e.g. iPhone Plus vs iPhone, iPad Air vs iPad mini) usually cost $100 more. And those even have a couple pros other than size over their smaller sibling too (iPhone Plus has OIS and longer battery life, iPad Air has more accurate colors, was thinner and faster until recently).
Now this is $300 more, and the biggest feature besides the larger screen is an active digitizer which can only be used if you buy the $100 Pencil, bringing it to a $400 premium over the iPad Air. Other than that, stuff like the A9X and other incremental hardware updates would have been expected on the $500 iPad Air 3, had it been released this fall as usual instead of the Pro.
Having a bigger iPad is worth an extra $100 IMO. The active stylus + digitizer is worth another $100. I think $69 would have been a reasonable price for the Smart Keyboard (same price as the Bluetooth Apple keyboard). That would have brought the total price to $768. In reality it's $1067, and that's completely nuts. It's a shame because the hardware itself is pretty attractive.
Apple also says the tablet is faster than 80% of portable PCs shipped in the last 12 months.
Maybe a lot of people who bought in the last year a pc portable are poor and took a mid range hardware cpu and gpuPlaying games with the numbers, many of those devices that it's comparing to are a fraction of the price of an iPad Pro. How fast is it compared to shipped units in the same price range?
Is this a generation of whining? As a developer I have to carry a laptop, a phone, oh the horrors. I bought a bag to carry them all. My shoulder and neck are strained with the extra 5 lbs.
I was thinking the same till they showed the internals, the logic board places the a9x bang in the middle of the iPad. Smart move![]()
The iPad pro is truly a PRO device, targeted at the Pro user. It's competing with other Pro devices such as Wacom, and executive high end users. In that market, the price point of the iPad pro is reasonable, even a bargain.
Exactly. It's largely irrelevant how many streams it can handle if you can't get them into the thing.How do you get 4K video on it? Dropbox?
How do you get 4K video on it? Dropbox?
using the ac-WIFI? 866mbit isn't exactly slow...
Still hard to swallow the price tag IMO.
We've come to expect that bigger versions of iOS devices (e.g. iPhone Plus vs iPhone, iPad Air vs iPad mini) usually cost $100 more. And those even have a couple pros other than size over their smaller sibling too (iPhone Plus has OIS and longer battery life, iPad Air has more accurate colors, was thinner and faster until recently).
Now this is $300 more, and the biggest feature besides the larger screen is an active digitizer which can only be used if you buy the $100 Pencil, bringing it to a $400 premium over the iPad Air. Other than that, stuff like the A9X and other incremental hardware updates would have been expected on the $500 iPad Air 3, had it been released this fall as usual instead of the Pro.
Having a bigger iPad is worth an extra $100 IMO. The active stylus + digitizer is worth another $100. I think $69 would have been a reasonable price for the Smart Keyboard (same price as the Bluetooth Apple keyboard). That would have brought the total price to $768. In reality it's $1067, and that's completely nuts. It's a shame because the hardware itself is pretty attractive.
The iPad pro is truly a PRO device, targeted at the Pro user. It's competing with other Pro devices such as Wacom, and executive high end users. In that market, the price point of the iPad pro is reasonable, even a bargain.
Xcode.
As a developer, I usually have to carry an iPhone (or two), an iPad and a MacBook laptop. If Xcode ran on an iPad (the Pro would likely be faster at building apps than last years MBA 11), I could leave the laptop at home and use the iPhone as the lldb console for testing apps on the iPad, or vice versa. No more inaccurate x86 Simulator, or waiting for apps to load over USB to the iPad for testing.
According to Apple, there are around 1M iOS developers, so it's not like this is a non-existent market segment.