pretty sure i just figured out that i dont need 16GB of storage lol.
so im going for an 8GB...
*atm, converting all audio files to AAC*
that way i hav ean extra $120 in my pocket to spend on cases and the likes...
What does converting them to ACC do?![]()
pretty sure i just figured out that i dont need 16GB of storage lol.
so im going for an 8GB...
*atm, converting all audio files to AAC*
that way i hav ean extra $120 in my pocket to spend on cases and the likes...
you will regret not getting 16gb, i assure you
you will regret not getting 16gb, i assure you
this is an issue i have been pondering all week.
was thinking that 8gb would be "enough," especially if wireless syncing is introduced at some point (so my music library can be refreshed daily/weekly)
how many apps do people think that the average user will have? and how much space do we think they will use? (i imagine that ill have quite a few apps - depending on what's out there, and how much it costs!)
im now thinking that for an extra $5/month, it might be worth it!
virtually cut the file size in half![]()
apple would NEVER allow the iphone to be $1000+ or even over $500 if they want it to be a much more 'affordable' phone.
So before you come in this thread and bag out australia, and say that australia is going to have to pay about 4x the original price he said it to be?
Steve said this '$199, and that is a mainly world wide price' so i don't see as to how australia would be a 3rd world country that raises the price a couple hundred dollars?
Get ya mind correct
Does it reduce sound quality?
just raising this thread to page one
who will be ebaying iPhones to the US as unlocked?
I always wondered what the point of "convert to ACC" was lol so thanks for that!
I never thought I would be waiting for the weekend to be over hahaha
no, surprisingly it doesnt.
i know its sounds crazy, but honestly, the sound quality turns out just the same as the original MP3 (or other audio) file.
It does reduce the sound quality - dramatically.
Reducing a 128kbps mp3 file to a 128kbps AAC file is doing two lossy conversions. You're doing the audio equivalent of a photocopy of a photocopy.
Sure it may sound OK to your ears but the quality of the sound is reduced to around that of FM radio - pretty poor.
well, i cant hear any difference.
and ive read multiple articles (dont ask me for links) where the author clearly states that it does not dramatically reduce sound quality.
but you may have a different opinion chundles.
Not an opinion - it's a fact. You might not be able to hear the difference but there is a difference.
^ It would never work. You'd need to get $800 just to break even.
Mactalk seems to have a lot of good info for Australian users but be warned they seem to be moderated by Thread Nazis! I am not a member but I read the threads and in teh space of 2o minutes I came across two people who had been banned for posting threads which were basically repeats of other threads. This is all well and good but they were protesting they hadn't seen the other threads.
Its a good site but I wouldn't dare post on it!
well, i cant hear any difference.
and ive read multiple articles (dont ask me for links) where the author clearly states that it does not dramatically reduce sound quality.
but you may have a different opinion chundles.
A lot of it comes down to the headphones/speakers you use. If you use Apple's bundled iPod headphones, you probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a 32kbps vs a 320kbps file!
I was quite happy listening to Jeff Buckley's 'Grace' album at 128kbps until I bought a nice pair of Phitek Blackbox headphones - and then I had to go back to the CD and re-rip it at 256kbps because the 'phones had exposed the weaknesses of the sample rate...
so the lesson...
never, ever, get a decent pair of headphones?