I LOLed so hard at "horrible OS" - dude, just get a 5 year old RAZR and go home!
And why would you want an iPod Touch that runs the same "horrible OS" as the iPhone?!?!?!![]()
+1
And you weren't a condescending dick
I LOLed so hard at "horrible OS" - dude, just get a 5 year old RAZR and go home!
And why would you want an iPod Touch that runs the same "horrible OS" as the iPhone?!?!?!![]()
They look good, and would look even better made smaller.
Then you're a clueless EVO user. How many Mifi apps can you download on your non-jailbreak iPhone? How many tethering apps? It's stuff like that which Apple does its damndest to block from its users. Real quality apps that serve a real purpose. Available on Android, not on the Apple store.
This comment just shows how little you know about what you are talking about... There is a huge difference in battery life between the iphone 3G (or 3GS) and the ipod Touch 3G, and its because of one thing.... the 3G network. The 3G network drains the battery on the iphone extremely quickly, and it results in more charges. BUT the ipod touch 3G is not on any cellular data network, so you should get a dramatically better battery life on it. Yet you say they have the same battery life...
Maybe your ipod touch battery life is so crappy because you're one of those people that disconnects the device and connects it back every 5 minutes?
How many would you need? MiWi is both of those combined into 1 simple to use no-strings attached app, and who cares if you have to jailbreak it? Everybody these days jailbreak their iPhones,
No they don't. Stop being a fanboy. The EVO in perfect light takes amazingly good pictures. The EVO sucks in low light. We still don't know how the iPhone 4 fares in low light, but considering Apple hasnt bothered to take any and show them off, it can be assumed that it too sucks.
Those are completely untouched photos out of the Evo? That is incredibly bad - they look along the lines of the quality that comes out of my daughter's Fisher-Price toy digital camera, and that takes 640x480 images, only much larger. Unacceptable. How can Evo owners stand for this? I don't care about "it's only a phone," it's a VERY expensive phone and that kind of quality is ridiculous. WOW.Then explain these. These are Evo pictures:
http://paulstamatiou.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/IMAG0217.jpg
http://paulstamatiou.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/IMAG0209.jpg
The first one:
The bright colors are washed out, the greens lack definition, and there is a sh load of noise in the picture.
The second one:
I don't know where to start. So much noise my ears are hurting, the whole picture lacks definition, and there is a major lack of detail on anything.
Which pictures are you looking at? Are you colour blind?Images look very washed out compared to the Apple site examples. No surprise there!
I estimate the iphone 4 has a pixel density of close to 40 MP/cm^2, which is the same as regular point&shoots you get today in the market. So, expect similar low light quality! Still pales to a DSLR.
Which pictures are you looking at? Are you colour blind?
Images look very washed out compared to the Apple site examples. No surprise there!
I don't think you know the meaning of "washed out" if you can call these two images washed out. They certainly aren't "washed out"! In fact saturation and noise levels on these two samples are damn impressive for a phone camera.
Boy, the yet to be released 4th generation iPhone is really making the rounds.
It reminds me of the travelling gnome in the film 'Amelie'.
Images look very washed out compared to the Apple site examples. No surprise there!