I really hope apple finds a way to work with the bezels if they plan to increase the screen size but the dam home button... Imo they need to come up with a replacement for it and explore options.
I've seen lots of women with GS5 and Notes women have the advantage of handbags.
The design is out dated at this point, it was fine 7 years ago but as screens get bigger they can't keep super-sizing the bezel to keep the status quo. If they drop the 16:9 ratio that would help.The balance is in the design. Wasted space versus symmetry. To a company like Apple who is very highly regarded for its design, it matters.
You are not alone .... I was hoping in something smaller than 4.7" .... Something like 4.3-4.5"
The design is out dated at this point, it was fine 7 years ago but as screens get bigger they can't keep super-sizing the bezel to keep the status quo. If they drop the 16:9 ratio that would help.
Does Apple think about women or girls?
I am wandering how many of them would like to have a phone as big as 4.7''? My wife is using 3.5'' phone and it is perfect for her. She will definitely not change it 4.7'' or even 4.0''.
This race for bigger screen is fine... but please keep the normal size (3.5'' was perfect) phone in the offer.
And many women (and men) want to use a phone with a single hand. And I believe it is a majority.
The balance is in the design. Wasted space versus symmetry. To a company like Apple who is very highly regarded for its design, it matters.
If you would like to take this over to the MLB thread great. I will be happy to discuss that with you.So, what did you think of that cheating Pineda last night??? Cheater!!!![]()
Really?? You're just like those kids who in the 1990's were still stuck in the 80's and wearing their old acid wash jeans, Judas Priest t-shirts, and rocking mullets.
Face it; mobile phones are getting bigger, so let's get real here.![]()
Not if you are holding it closer than print.
Really?? You're just like those kids who in the 1990's were still stuck in the 80's and wearing their old acid wash jeans, Judas Priest t-shirts, and rocking mullets.
Face it; mobile phones are getting bigger, so let's get real here.![]()
I believe Displaymate came out and said the S5's screen is the best available now. I believe pentile amoled has progressed and it not as static as you make it sound.
What about the 1080p LCD phones?
Well that's dumbing it down quite a bit in a manner that suits your argument.
And if Apple made a 6 inch phone it would sell too. I think the name Apple is what sells more than the device itself.Surprise surprise the best selling high end model during the last year was a 4" device .... The iPhone. Face it.
----------
No needs to keep a smartphone closer than that, unless you don't want to ruin your eyes.
I'm not sure why when it comes to phones some people want to force others to get something they don't want. Just like not everyone wants a huge truck, not everyone wants a huge phone. There is a market for small cars just like there is a market for small phones. That isn't going to change. Apple isn't going to stop making a smaller iPhone. They know their market.
And if Apple made a 6 inch phone it would sell too. I think the name Apple is what sells more than the device itself.
Displaymate conclusions has nothing to do with pixel density.
Well it's certainly a great screen and regarded as better than current iphone screen
I love iOS, so I will buy the iPhone 6 no matter what,....
I absolutely agree on this.
But it's not the iPhone screen resolution the problem
And it is not so much better (if you read Displaymate article , they focused their analysis on S4 comparison, not iPhone ). iPhone's screen, while smaller than many other, still is among the best on the market.
Link please.wow, I'm gob smacked.. you are deffo gonna.buy something you havnt even seen... Do you live the rest of your life like this...
----------
It's deffo in the top 6 or 7.. , just after various models from HTC, Sony, Samsung, LG, have I missed anyone off?..
Link please.
It is most probably in the top 3 ....
According with anandtech analysis, iPhone's display still is the best in several tests
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7903/samsung-galaxy-s-5-review/6
Displaymate is not the only player on the market dude, and I ant see any HTC or sony or lg better tha iPhone.
So what happens when the iPhone's wasted space (ugly top & bottom bezels) is part of the design?
The issue here is that the iPhone is getting stale, and all designers revamp their designs after a while. If not, we'd still all be driving Model T's.
Apple is lagging here.
The design is out dated at this point, it was fine 7 years ago but as screens get bigger they can't keep super-sizing the bezel to keep the status quo. If they drop the 16:9 ratio that would help.
So because Apple made a bad design they are stuck with it now? Apple changes their form factor on computers all the time.Their design is iconic and recognizable, even from a marketing point of view, it would be a terrible idea to change for the sake of change...
I'm not sure why when it comes to phones some people want to force others to get something they don't want. Just like not everyone wants a huge truck, not everyone wants a huge phone. There is a market for small cars just like there is a market for small phones. That isn't going to change. Apple isn't going to stop making a smaller iPhone. They know their market.
No needs?No needs to keep a smartphone closer than that, unless you don't want to ruin your eyes.
wait wait wait. some people forcing something on others?
do you mean like.... apple? only giving a very specific choice to the customer? without much or any option to customize? do it and use it the way we intended it or dont do it in the first place?
not everyone wants a huge phone? not everyone wants a small phone either. apple would be clever to offer a small 4" and a larger 4.x" (no android pun intended) phone.
But not all women and girls work in a corporate environment. There are many of them who don't and would like to have a truly mobile phone.
I remember 6-7 years ago (before smartphone era) the trend was completely opposite. All phones were smaller and smaller with tiny buttons. Very difficult to use for a man. I think it is all matter of common sense 3.5'' is perfect size.
Why do I need 5''? It it is not good as good as 9'' for comfortable reading or working neither as good as 3.5'' for mobility and single hand usage.
Not to burst your bobbles here, but... You know that Samsung is playing in the grey when it comes to their display and their display technologies right?
Devices like the Samsung Galaxy S3, S4 and S5 and devices like the new Samsung Galaxy Tab and Note Pro all features AMOLED display with Pentile Matrix panels.
For those who are not that familiar with this term and what it means it basically means that Samsung is cutting down on the amount of actual underlying pixels on their panels. All these devices features only the marked amount of pixels in terms of green pixels. Each and every pixel on a display would normally feature three underlying pixels, one blue, one red and one green. But Samsung have gone about and done some trickery here and cut the amount of underlying blue and red pixels in half.
Dumbing it all down one cloud say if you take the Samsung Galaxy S5 for example, it only features a 1920x1080 resolution when there is ONLY green pixels in use. Blue and red only features effective resolution of 1280x720. If it wasn't for the marked accepting fishy marketing these devices should be marked as having a effective PPI of 343 and not 441.
If you are one of those who feel and believe the display of a Galaxy S4 / S5 is much sharper compared to a iPhone 5 / 5S then its pretty much all in your head. I 'am not one of those who claim that all this pentile nonsense from Samsung means their display is lacking quality, its not like going from 441 to 343 PPI is something anyone would ever notice in real life situations but those who keep bashing iPhone for their "lower" PPI should start getting their facts about the display technology in question straight before commenting.
The whole point behind the term "retina" is to classify a display to have such a high resolution and pixel density (PPI) under normal viewing distances and angels that getting higher resolution is pointless. Going beyond the 300+ mark is utterly pointless for the viewing experience, it will only drag the battery life down even further and require even more cpu and gpu horsepower to make thing preform perfectly.