But think about the TouchWiz [Grace UX or whatever] on the Note7 is actually the culprit. The S7 doesn't have the heavier layer for Pen and other NOTE-only enhancements that I call "bloat" that slows down your system...
Nope. Like i have said, the culprint is the kernel that controls the CPU or it's a RAM management issue that make the phone to take longer time to load apps. Because on my Galaxy S6 edge+ with the custom ROM that uses the Grace UX is buttery smooth and lightning fast. There is no reasons an Exynos 7420 CPU should be faster at loading apps over an Exynos 8890 CPU,
Another note is that I do recall a similar test with the 820 variant of the S7 being NOT over 1min slower than the 6s. Think about that for a second. I point my fingers at the Note7 "bloat"-additional "tools"... Let's face it, Samsung's strong suit isn't software.
Again, i have proofs on my side that shows that the Galaxy Note7 is slow because of the Snapdragon 820 CPU. Look at this video that shows that the Galaxy S7 with the Snapdragon 820 CPU uses 2 minutes and 41 seconds to do it's job the Galaxy S7 with the Exynos CPU used only 2 minutes and 3 seconds to finish:
Now look at this video again to see that the Galaxy S7 edge with the Exynos CPU isn't only 14 seconds slower than the iPhone 6S Plus, but it's only 10 seconds slower than the iPhone 6S Plus:
And lastly, have a look at this video that shows that the Galaxy Note7 with the Snapdragon 820 CPU uses about the same time to finish it's app loading test as the Galaxy S7 with the Snapdragon 820 CPU used:
The Exynos version of the Galaxy Note7 will be as fast as the Galaxy S7 edge version with the Exynos CPU which again is about 10 seconds slower than the iPhone 6S Plus.
1. dual edge screen is useless and still deemed a gimmick by many reviewers [always starting out to say that it looks cool, but beyond that, it's a gimmick with its current implementation]
Yeah, soneone calls it gimmicky. I call it neat features that takes advantages of the hardware the phones comes with.
But then, pretty much everyone who have done reviews of the iPhone 6S / 6S Plus says the 3D Touch is a gimmick aswell. So it's not only Samsung's phones that have gimmicks.
2. Better screen res: NOT according to my above post info that states that the NOTE7 is NOT 518ppi but only True 366ppi due to the subpixel controversy. : look what wiki says under "Controversy"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PenTile_matrix_family
"An early controversy regarding the definition or measurement of resolution of color subpixelated flat panel displays in general, and for subpixel rendered displays in particular, led many people[23][24][25] to question the resolution claims of PenTile display products.[26] One school holds that resolution is defined by the number of red, green, and blue subpixels, in groups of three, in an array in each axis.[citation needed] The other school holds that resolution is found by counting the number of line pairs, black & white (or bright and dark) lines and spaces that may be simultaneously rendered on the screen, in each axis.[5]"
Don't forget that Samsung's phones since the Galaxy S4 uses something called 'Diamond Pixel Pentile' which is not the same as the old 'PenTile Matrix' you are refering to.
3. Better Screen Calibration - according to who? Displaymate? I call foul, I'm allowed to.
DisplayMate have proven it times after times that nothing comes close to the Super AMOLED screens Samsung uses in their phones. And lately they have also proven that the screen on the Galaxy Note7 is unbeatable. Here is the proof:
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note7_ShootOut_1.htm
So i have the proof while you have nothing except for your opinion. Who should i listen to?
You with your opinion or someone who are experts in screen calibrations for the professional market?
4. Better Back Camera? Well, OK, but - what about the Leica branded lens on the Huawei Phone? and that phone is also about half the price... point is, adroid "flagships" are dime a dozen and double the price for a better camera is not worth it... furthermore, I can argue that the OnePlus "light" android skin is a better experience than GraceWiz.
The camera on the Huawei P9 is good, but it's not as good as the camera on the Galaxy S7 edge or Galaxy Note7.
Here is another proof of that:
http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Samsung-Galaxy-S7-Edge-Mobile-Review-A-new-champion . Here you can see that the Galaxy S7 edge is on top with 88 in score while the Huawei P9 have 80 in score as shown here:
http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Huawei-P9-vs.-P8-Mobile-review-Good-improvement-for-the-latest-device
Heck, even the Galaxy S6 edge+ that i have is at 87 in score:
http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Sams...bile-review-Bigger-and-better-for-photography
5. S Pen? Ok, I'll give you that one... but for me, it's a yawner and for many others like on the last Mobile Roar Podcast, they said that they've tried the Note5 pen for the first week of owning then put it away almost forever.
When i had the Galaxy Note 4 earlier, i regulary used the S Pen. But i wasn't using the S Pen alot though. But it's still a very nice thing to have from time to time for those who uses the Galaxy phones for productivity and that. For that the S Pen is a gift from god, almost.
6. Water Resistance? Lets see how true to the Ip68 rating it really is in tests from Consumer Reports etc - hope it is not another S7active water leak issue.
Why are you taking in manufacturing issues into this?
Did the Galaxy S7 / S7 edge had this issue?
No, then why should the Galaxy Note7 have that issue then?
Not only that, but Samsung admitted it was a defect from them and would fix that issue right away. And everyone who was affected by that will get a new phone from them. So Samsung did everything correctly here by addressing the issue.
7. Better Battery Life? how much better? and is it worth an extra $double$?
The battery life on the Galaxy Note7 is quite alot better than the OnePlus 3. Here is the battery life for the Galaxy Note7 with the Exynos CPU:
http://cdn.gsmarena.com/imgroot/rev...eview/battery/-728/samsung-galaxy-note7-2.jpg
And here is the battery life for the OnePlus 3:
http://cdn.gsmarena.com/imgroot/reviews/16/oneplus-3/battery/-728/gsmarena_001.jpg
And you are not paying the double of the OnePlus 3 just for the battery alone. I did point out those 12 things in my earlier post on why the price on the Galaxy Note7 can be defended.
8. Iris scanner works good? I call gimmick. and works mediocre - picky positioning, not working with glasses, contact lens, bright lighting issues, etc etc --- seams to be cool idea, but in practice, it is a gimmick. I'd rather have a Glass fingerprint reader - no?
According to all reviews that has been done of the Galaxy Note7, everyone says the Iris scanner on the Galaxy Note7 works incredible good to be the first of it's kind on a smartphone. And i have seen test of the Iris scanner where it have scanned the eyes of a person with sunglasses on.
But yeah, as this is the first of it's kind, there will always be issues with it. But still, it works good for what it is now.
9. Multiwindow will be introduced on NOugat in a few days? if OnePlus and the carriers let you have it
Samsung have had it all since the Note 2 came out. Android is only 4-5 years after Samsung here. And, as pretty much no one have Nougat yet, the Multiwindow functionality is still an advantage on the Samsung phones that have it as everyone can get that right now.
This will be an advantage until more and more phones will start to get Android 7.0 Nougat.
10. Real Theme support? What's that? and do you work for Samsung? [serious question]
So just because i point out a fact that the theme support on Samsung phones, specially the new ones with Grace UX have a really great theme engine where you can change the theme and then on top of that change the icon pack on the theme, i work for Samsung just because i pointed that out?
You should try out Grace UX before you will understand how great the theme engine is and how many themes there are out there for the Samsung phones.
But i know. Look here:
http://www.gsmarena.com/oneplus_3-7995.php
No aptX support for the OnePlus 3 according to that while there is aptX support for the Galaxy Note7 as you can see here:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note7-8082.php
Well, if you don't believe the facts here:
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note7_ShootOut_1.htm , then what makes you believe it then?
The fact is that you need to have an insane high amount of brightness before you can be able to show HDR videos as the Galaxy Note7 can. No other phones even comes close (except for Samsung's own phones) to the brightness the Galaxy Note7 have. The Galaxy Note7 have the insane '1048 cd/m2 (nits)' while the iPhone 6S Plus have the poor '566 cd/m2 (nits) in brightness which is half of what the Galaxy Note7 have.
Again, while I agree that ALL OS have security holes, Apple is the BEST at patching and getting them out to EVERYONE on IOS within reasonable time frames (now that is worth double$-for your most personal device that follows you everywhere). And again, some Android devices under 4.4.4 will never get any patches.
as for your claim on "haven't seen or heard many users affected" research and look for yourself: and discover, ignorance is not bliss:
Apple is better to get security fixes out to all of it's phones WHEN they release a security fix. But Apple is not fastest or best on fixing security holes at a regular basis as Samsung is faster with that as Samsung have guaranteed security fixes every months. Because fixing security holes will never stop. So because of that, Samsung is both better and faster by giving out timely security fixes to it's phones that get those security fixes.
The Kaspersky researchers call it "a gratuitous act of violence against Android users."
...
http://www.wired.co.uk/article/adult-player-android-porn-ransomware
"A malicious pornography app for Android has been extorting people who download it by taking pictures of them."
while this one is not on the Playstore, it is just an example of what NOT getting security patches in a timely manner gets you. Maybe you're lucky to be in a country that may have laws against carriers to dictate which patches you get ... North America carriers are horrible - Like Verizon, Telus, Bell which have how many subscribers? And we aren't even considering Asia and other parts of Europe yet.
http://www.cnet.com/news/malware-from-china-infects-over-10-million-android-users-report-says/
ok. Speaking of Asia... OVER 10,000,000 affected.
"At least 10 million Android devices have been infected by malware called HummingBad, according to cybersecurity software maker Check Point."
and HOW do you know for sure that your Android machine is not infected? Do you trust your virus scanners? Have you ever had your windows machine virus scanner miss things? Zero Day anyone?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/26/android_malware_whack_a_mole/
"Security researchers have discovered a strain of Android malware that keeps finding its way onto Google Play – despite the store supposedly being scrubbed clean of infiltrated apps.
The software nasty – Android.Spy.277.origin – is hidden in more than 100 applications on Google Play. Sketchy programs harboring the malware masquerade as legitimate popular games and the like, but they come with a secret backdoor."
http://www.fastcompany.com/3062867/overlay-malware-google-adsense
"The issue has since been resolved, a Google spokeswoman said in an email, adding that there's no indication the attack ever affected more than one website. "
Only one website? In the wild? Yes. and do you really believe that it was only on one website? and even if itonly one website, how many visitors did this site have and got the infection?
To the first thing about Kaspersky. Don't you think Kaspersky are trying to scare the normal users and get them to buy their software on their phones by doing the scaremongering towards the users to gain more money from dumb peoples who will buy their software that wont help in any ways on Android?
And as for the first link. An app like that barely affect anyone before an app like that gets nuked by Google. The second link is from China which uses tons of other 3rd party app stores for Android. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what the issue is. As China doesn't use the official Google Play Store, they are not included in the security of Android with the Play Store installed. And what is 10 million out of how many peoples in total that are using Android in China?
That's nothing.
As for the third link. Whoa there bud. Over 100 apps that are infected with malwares. That's nothing compared to the 4000+ apps that was infected with malwares in iOS's App Store:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34338362 and:
http://www.darknet.org.uk/2015/09/xcodeghost-ios-trojan-infected-over-4000-apps/
And lastly, for the 4th link. Yes, as you have written there, only one webpage was affected by that and very few peoples was affected by that webpage. So nothing to worry about. So move on.
All of those posts are nothing more than scaremongering from the media. For peoples who lives with Android everyday and are more technically into Android or are an advanced user like me, knows the real story behind the malware scaremongering from the media.
Android as it is out of the box with Play Store installed is extremely safe to use. It's even safer than iOS in some areas to.
No, device, or issues with Samsung's production has no bearing on their mediocre implementation... furthermore, how "few" are you claiming?
proof? or are you just hearing and using anecdotes again?
It's still a manufacturing problem that was fixed. That's not the same as having tons of scratches on the screen after you have started to use it. I don't know about anyone with a Galaxy S6 series, Galaxy S7 series phones or even the Galaxy Note 4 and the Note 5 that have any scratches on their screens.
Does scratches happens?
Ofc, but it's so rarely that it's not an issue or nothing to worry about. What about the iPhones that have scratches to?:
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/iphone-6s-plus-screen-scratches.1924135/ and:
https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/3vqx0l/iphone_6s_has_about_a_dozen_scratches_how_is_this/
I'll guess that's not an issue, because it's Apple and they are the best, right?
yeah... fixed in January2016. When was the Pengate n5 introduced??? Sept2015?
WTF, so that means 4months worth of sales, 4months of customers in the millions got RTFM. anger. disgust. fear.
The point here that you don't seems to grasp is that Samsung fixed it, which is the whole point. How long time did it take Apple to fix the Antennagate issue after that was discovered after the iPhone 4 was released?
Apple didn't bother to fix it before the iPhone 4S came out 1 year later.
4 months is heck of alot better time than 1 year.
I'm thoroughly impressed.
Good. It just shows how good battery life Samsung's phones have. My Galaxy S6 edge+ only have a 3000 mAh battery to which is 600 mAh lower than the Galaxy S7 edge.
Sounds like you're making excuses for Samsung.
My point stands. Just click on this:
http://www.bing.com/search?q=scratched+home+button&src=IE-TopResult&FORM=IETR02&conversationid=
I only searched "scratched home button" and Samsung and s6 comes up automatically. Coincidence?
either way, Samsung screwed up bigtime by using plastic for a fingerprint reader/HOME button that MANY use their sharp fingernails to press [women anywhere?]
Again, i'm not denying it that scratches happens on the home button. Damnit, learn to read what i write.
What i'm saying is that the issue you are exaggerating overboard like crazy is NOT an issue for most peoples. It's rare to come over someone who have scratched the home button when you take into consideration on how many Galaxy S6 series phones Samsung have sold. Yeah, soneone is reporting about the issue some few peoples have. That doesn't mean it's actually an issue. It just means someone are reporting that some few souls have that issue.
Do you see the difference here?
I'm afraid you didn't. If you did, it must have been a poor excuse.
I'm happy for you that your custom ROMs.
But do you think MANY android users custom ROM and TWEAK their phones? and even if there are, isn't that like swapping the SUSPENSION SYSTEM out of a flagship [Ferrari or something]? Isn't a Flagship Phone with the Flagship price suppose to be already "perfect"? If not, what are you paying for?
Perhaps a better analogy be: "why lower a Ferrari?"
am I making sense?
No, you are not making sense in what i'm talking about. I know most users doesn't root their phones and installs custom ROMs. But that's not the freaking point here. The point is that no matter how much stuffs from the ROM i removed, the phone was as fast with none of the stuffs removed as the phone was with the stuffs removed.
I just pointed out that removing much of what you guys calls for bloatware doesn't make a difference on the speed on the phones AT ALL. Yes, this has nothing to do with what the normal user does or does not do. It's all about the tests i have done when it's about the speed of the phones to Samsung, or one of their phones.
Or is this to hard for you to understand?
I disagree... for you to just blindly trust "tests that confirm BEST display" is... Lazy.
Amoled is STILL being improved apon and while it is good, it is not yet iPhone quality and reliability proven. So IF apple adopts Amoled for their iphone8, I hope it is not in its current state.
And as for Burn-in, bottom line is that it has a high chance of it happening because we all are using the phone MORE AND MORE each day... and I for one prefer true-reliable-longevity over the flickering-subpixel-cheating Amoled screens. Have a great weekend!
Question is, should i listen to what all of the reviews of the Samsung phones says about the screens on those phones, or should i listen to an Apple fanboy on a MacRumor forum?
The fact like everyone who have done reviews of Samsung phones is that nothing comes close to the Super AMOLED screens today. Samsung have developed the Super AMOLED technology in a lightning speed the last 3 years and have passed the quality of the IPS LCD screens several years ago. When the Note 4 came out, Super AMOLED passed the IPS LCD screens for the first time. After that, Super AMOLED have been developed years after years while IPS LCD screens pretty much have been sitting stand still and have barely been improved on.
And lastly, when it's about VR, you don't want to use an LCD screen for that. Thrust me on that one. LCD screen have lower refresh rate than Super AMOLED screens, so Super AMOLED screens will be better to use that way. And ofc Super AMOLED have true black that makes everything looks better in VR to.
So, what do we see after all of my replies to you here?
We see that i'm responding to a guy with no clues about Android or Samsung that are using scaremongering when it comes to malwares and are using opinions over what the hard facts says.
Have a good day and don't get stuck in the Apple-bubble forever. It's not good for your health in the longer run.