For God's sake why not just ship with Wireless headphones
Because fidelity. Because HiFi. Because charging.
For God's sake why not just ship with Wireless headphones
What's most maddening to me is that there is no added functionality. Current iPhones can drive audio via lightning and Dragonfly has already built a pretty inelegant but the only possible working solution to this "feature." No true audiophile is going to buy a DAC or set of headphones that will only be usable with an iPhone and the fact they're using lightning instead of usb-c just guarantees this market will be DOA. It's just an incredibly unwise business decision.
As I said Tim Cook hasn't really brought anything new or fresh look at Boses new headphones it is Wireless, Noise Cancelling and can take phone calls could Beats headphones that are wireless have noise cancelling? Last I asked a Apple employee no it does not.
I'm putting the following in bold because I think it's important people know about this.
The iPhone 7 isn't looking to be much of an upgrade (only people like me will buy it regardless) and it's for one very simple reason. Next year will be the 10th anniversary of the iPhone (as most of you will know) and Apple will be introducing the iPhone 8 with an OLED display (possibly curved), embedded Touch ID and more new features.
If Apple made major changes this year with the iPhone 7, that would mean that next year with the next iPhone, they'd only include minor features (like an "s" upgrade) and this is obviously something they want to avoid. Apple are throwing all their eggs in one basket with the iPhone 8 even if it means that sales go down yet again but they'll make up for it in 2017.
You say no audiophile will buy a DAC, but then talk about a DAC in the same post. Evidently Dragonfly thinks that people will buy a DAC, as do the other companies that are coming out with them.
You really think the people around here complaining about how they spent $500, or $1000 on headphones with a 3.5mm jack aren't going to buy a $20-30 adaptor to allow them to keep using those same headphones?
Other phone manufacturers are now dropping their 3.5mm jacks and going with USB-C. Most high end headphones already come with detachable 3.5mm cords. It's pretty easy to see that very soon we will start seeing a lot of the high end headphones start building in their own DAC, and then just have a USB-C jack on the headphones. They you either get a USB-C to USB-C cable to hook up to your Samsung/HTC/LG phone, or a USB-C to lightning cable to hook up to your iPhone/iPad. Doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me.
As far as this rumor goes, I don't see this happening at all. If Apple drops the 3.5mm jack, they will include a newer set or earpods with lightning cable and the DAC built in. That way all the people can tell their friends how much better the new earpods sound and how awesome audio over lightning is (even if in real life there is little or no difference in sound quality). Leaving the earpods the same and making everyone use the adaptor would create a much larger backlash in my opinion.
Because Tim Cook fancies the Beats Headphones he isn't Steve Jobs who was about consumers not just about cash but what would get customers into buying a Apple product.
don't *want to believe it, but...Sounds too sloppy for apple, don't believe it
Sounds too sloppy for apple, don't believe it
Stereo speakers take up space.Perhaps I'm just being stupid, but if the iPhone 7 is indeed the same dimensions as the 6s (as rumoured), then what is the point of removing the 3.5 jack? Soon we will have to wear a chainmail gauntlet to hold our phones as they are too thin and sharp.
I say no way is Apple going to give us something for free. Not happening.
Edit: I forgot they do give us Apple stickers so.. that's something.
Edit2: I guess its not really free a 16GB iPhone is $649.99.
There were times when I would have said the same & bet everything I own against such rumors. Then recent products with really sloppy solutions to crucial design problem were released: like the latest Magic Mouse or Apple battery case…
Because they don't sound as good...For God's sake why not just ship with Wireless headphones
There were times when I would have said the same & bet everything I own against such rumors. Then recent products with really sloppy solutions to crucial design problem were released: like the latest Magic Mouse or Apple battery case…
Because they don't sound as good...
For God's sake why not just ship with Wireless headphones
Now, I can see an argument for Bluetooth headphones with Bluetooth 5. If apple really wanted to innovate, the iPhone 7 would have Bluetooth 5 with apt-x support. But as of right now, wired or bust.No kidding!!!
Obviously people who think they sound fine are listening to highly compressed mp3's or talk shows. Upgrade, use a lossless file (yes, I know they have some loss ), some decent in ear headphones, and you will hear a huge difference.
Cost. I am sure there will be a wireless headphone accessory also launched with the iPhone 7. A pair of buds with a joining wire is probably the configuration with the volume / play controller hanging down from the right ear to pectoral height.For God's sake why not just ship with Wireless headphones
I don't under the Magic Mouse complaints. If you own one, you'd realize it's not a issue. It last for months, if you get a low battery warning, you still have hours of use left, if it's that critical you get a day long with two minutes of charging, and top it up overnight. Heck, plug it in when going to the restroom if you get a low battery warning. I use mine all the time and it hasn't been an issue with charging.
You will not see anything Bluetooth 5 for 12 to 18 months on the retail market. The standard was just released and there is no silicon for mass market. My take is Bluetooth 5 will be in the iPhone 8 toward end of next year.Now, I can see an argument for Bluetooth headphones with Bluetooth 5. If apple really wanted to innovate, the iPhone 7 would have Bluetooth 5 with apt-x support. But as of right now, wired or bust.