It's a bit sad that Apple feel the need to charge $1k + to give their users tech that their rivals have been successfully using for years. Unless I'm missing some magic ingredients aside from OLED panels?
Dude, that's dark. XDOr die after 56 years.?
"Edition" is a stupid name. For uniformity, why not call the 7S and 7S Plus "Version" and "Model".
Such a dumb name. I'm sure lots of thought went into it.
I don't remember anyoneone calling the Macbook Air "inferior rubbish" and that was (is) sold along-side a Macbook Pro.No, that would be a very bad choice as it would make the standard models (i.e. the models that sell in their 100's of millions) sound inferior rubbish.
I don't remember anyoneone calling the Macbook Air "inferior rubbish" and that was (is) sold along-side a Macbook Pro.
Expect a gimmicky stuff as an excuse to charge exorbitant price. Maybe the model will come with an engraving of Steve Jobs that glows. All your selfies will have that glow and people will know you paid $1500 for the latest iPhone!
We never know what idea that marketing woman will come.
Yeah, Apple should have never released the SE or the Plus model. Those minority groups that prefer these sizes should not deserve to have those phones.It was way cooler back when Apple just had ONE version of the iPhone (but in different storage capacities and with black and white options). Such simpler times! Now it's like they're trying to confuse their customers by having so many different versions... Ugh!
When I see rumours about the $1000 iPhone it always reminds me about this quote from Steve Jobs:
"What ruined Apple wasn't growth. What ruined Apple was values. John Sculley ruined Apple and he ruined it by bringing a set of values to the top of Apple which were corrupt and corrupted some of the top people who were there, drove out some of the ones who were not corruptible, and brought in more corrupt ones and paid themselves collectively tens of millions of dollars and cared more about their own glory and wealth than they did about what built Apple in the first place -- which was making great computers for people to use.
They didn't care about that anymore. They didn't have a clue about how to do it and they didn't take any time to find out because that's not what they cared about. They cared about making a lot of money. So they had this wonderful thing that a lot of brilliant people made called the Macintosh and they got very greedy. And instead of following the original trajectory of the original vision -- which was to make this thing an appliance, to get this out there to as many people as possible -- they went for profits and they made outlandish profits for about four years. Apple was one of the most profitable companies in America for about four years.
What that cost them was the future. What they should have been doing was making reasonable profits and going for market share, which was what we always tried to do.
If this is the case, I'm glad I bought the iPhone 7. I had a 5S and was trying to hold out for the 2017 model because of all the rumors.
No way I would buy an edition model for the higher prices and I would just feel cheated if I bought a 7S.
Because in six years the current iPhone will be "10" (7s,8,8s,9,9s,10)iPhone Editionwhy not just iPhone 10
I guess this is a way to "phase in" OLED, and that's fine by me. Prices of OLED phones will go down eventually.
It's quite a COOKed up name.Such a dumb name. I'm sure lots of thought went into it.