Who needs ****in 256GB or even 512GB in a smartphone?
Even some of new MacBooks got less that that!
I still have more than enough with my iPhone SE 16GB.
Never needed more.
Those people who transfer ALL music to their iPhones are SICK.
Why dont you just stream? Use Apple Music, use amazon prime, soundcloud whatever!
I wonder why people still download instead of streaming.
And with the iCloud and other clouds, nobody needs to save all the stuff local on the phone.
Just backup in the cloud all of your ****in photos, videos, music whatever.
Amazing! This is literally a super computer in your pocket, more storage than a MacBook Pro!
I still have more than enough with my iPhone SE 16GB.
Never needed more.
I use icloud storage, but that just pushes all of the data to all of your devices. Plus I like having everything with me all of the time.
You know the SSD in your Mac and the Flash in your iOS devices are different, right? They have different archetechtures, rated differently, different speeds, different lifespan, different costs for manufacturing and more.512gb? For a phone? That's ridiculous. Hopefully, that means that Mac SSD pricing drops significantly or capacity goes up.
64gb is plenty for me so I'll probably go with the base model this time around.
Yeah it's plenty for about 90% of customers
good point!That is going to push the price north of 1250 GBP....for a phone...GULP!!!!
Who needs ****in 256GB or even 512GB in a smartphone?
Even some of new MacBooks got less that that!
I still have more than enough with my iPhone SE 16GB.
Never needed more.
Those people who transfer ALL music to their iPhones are SICK.
Why dont you just stream? Use Apple Music, use amazon prime, soundcloud whatever!
I wonder why people still download instead of streaming.
And with the iCloud and other clouds, nobody needs to save all the stuff local on the phone.
Just backup in the cloud all of your ****in photos, videos, music whatever.
it's more than clear, that majority of people would be more than fine with 128G, that's the only reason why they don't offer it, to force people buy more expensive version. I hate this strategy, especially with MBPJust do 128/256/512. Apple are so petty lmao.
Depends entirely on compression and bitrate. 4K and 4mbps, meh won't take up much space. And why not, you seen how compressed and ****** itunes 1080P is?If you're recording 4K video, you could easily fill up the 64gb (less than that in actual usage space) really quickly
Here in Switzerland we have 4G+ everywhere, doesnt matter on the top of a snowy mountain, tunnel or in the city. The cloud is ultra fast.
In 2 years we get 5G and download/upload with 10Gbit/s.
Who will need 512GB or 1TB memory then?
No way for the cloud. My wife had uploaded a bunch of pictures to iCloud and this has been 3-4 years ago but when she went to download them to her computer most came back all pixelated. We do still put minor stuff on iCloud now but the main question is this: Why wouldn't I want my music with me? I go outdoors in some remote regions with no cell reception and I sure do not to be paying for a streaming service.Who needs ****in 256GB or even 512GB in a smartphone?
Even some of new MacBooks got less that that!
I still have more than enough with my iPhone SE 16GB.
Never needed more.
Those people who transfer ALL music to their iPhones are SICK.
Why dont you just stream? Use Apple Music, use amazon prime, soundcloud whatever!
I wonder why people still download instead of streaming.
And with the iCloud and other clouds, nobody needs to save all the stuff local on the phone.
Just backup in the cloud all of your ****in photos, videos, music whatever.
It's only able to be implemented on A9 chips and up.I am on iOS 11 public beta 6
Apple is estimating 350 megabytes per minute recording 4K at 30fps.
I actually get 3.04 hours at that rate
What am I missing? Is h.265 only newer hardware? Not implemented yet? Apples own estimating is off?
If only NVIDIA drivers didn't have so many bugs that half of the recently released metal games doesn't run on them.
They are crap, heat generated will burn inside components or even crack the boards, this has been a very well known issue in the laptop industry for over 2 decades.
Why would they create a fan built desktop version if they could fit the same amount of power on a smaller fanless chip? and no, power-wise not the same also, clearly stated in specs at AMD & Nvidia sites.
Why would Razer waste space with a 1080? Why would desktop & mobile chips price differ?
very few people really need 256G (I don't say it's not nice to have it), Apple should rather start putting a reasonable amount to MBP, then you will be able to fully backup your phone and still have couple of GB left lolBecause streaming and clould storage don't work when you are flying?
Because when we travel internationally, roaming data charges are kinda expensive... maybe a bit more than just a little?! Because some files are too sensitive or private to store in the clould without end-to-end encryption, and not that many people are technically inclined enough to do that?!
I agree if I never took out the trash I would need a 20,000 sq foot home.