A pen, a pencil, isn't a stylus.
The video and quotes of Steve often get rolled out whenever the Apple Pencil is discussed. However, in defence of Tim Cook, I think people are too quick to jump to those quotes/video.
At the time Steve made those comments in the keynote, pretty much all 'touch screen' devices were shockingly bad and pretty much unusable with just a finger - at least in the way we use them now. Most devices resorted to needing a stylus as the only reasonable way of interacting with the device. The iPhone changed all that, and Steve's comments were indicative of that shift in technology. Here'a device with a touch screen so good, so accurate, so responsive that you can use it entirely without a stylus, unlike 98% of devices on the market at that time. It was a game changer.
The Apple Pencil is an optional stylus. You don't need it. You can use the iPad Pro without the Pencil. But with it, you can write naturally or be more precise.
In that sense, I don't think Steve's comments are completely out of sync with the existence of the Pencil?
Start from the beginning. There's plenty of time..."You clearly still don't understand Steve was smarter than you, me and everybody, in every single thing we do."
In. Every. Single. Thing. Wow. Just wow! I don't even know where to start.
How so?
(you could read the post that is one before yours too... )
Glad to know that at least some people here are aware of the concept of "context".
only read the upvoted on the article page and replied cause of the up votes.
What the heck does that mean???
I'd be happy to be one of those snowflakes.Put a Cellular chip into an iPad Mini 4 and sell it to the "artistic" people.
Instant market - 5% actual artist arty people, 95% people who are "like, so arty" and buy it because "inspired unique snowflake"
Because that's the stupidity of lethargic innovation or "replivation": replicating something that was developed for on one platform to be forcibly repeated on another, whether appropriate or not.Armchair critics back at it again. The Pencil is incredible on the iPad. It's not simply a tool used to "click" on things or draw jaggy lines.
If Apple adds support for the Pencil on an iPhone, what the hell is wrong with that?
Armchair critics back at it again. The Pencil is incredible on the iPad. It's not simply a tool used to "click" on things or draw jaggy lines.
If Apple adds support for the Pencil on an iPhone, what the hell is wrong with that?
With you on the iPad. Pencil for the iPhone is a stylus, despite what they say.Steve Jobs was talking the smartphones that needed styluses just to use the phone. He wasn’t imagining someone trying to take notes, draw, or hand write on the iPad.
I think Apple Pencil for the iPhone would be mostly pointless, but the Apple Pencil with my iPad Pro totally made me eat my words when I actually used it. Apple Pencil is excellent if you to do more than play games and finger paint.
Click this and scroll down the page. You're welcome
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/10/13/iphones-with-apple-pencil-2019/
Armchair critics back at it again. The Pencil is incredible on the iPad. It's not simply a tool used to "click" on things or draw jaggy lines.
If Apple adds support for the Pencil on an iPhone, what the hell is wrong with that?
OK, I guess you are speaking in some other language because I asked you what you meant by your comment and you've directed me to the article we are talking about. I'm good on that... already saw the article.
The video and quotes of Steve often get rolled out whenever the Apple Pencil is discussed. However, in defence of Tim Cook, I think people are too quick to jump to those quotes/video.
At the time Steve made those comments in the keynote, pretty much all 'touch screen' devices were shockingly bad and pretty much unusable with just a finger - at least in the way we use them now. Most devices resorted to needing a stylus as the only reasonable way of interacting with the device. The iPhone changed all that, and Steve's comments were indicative of that shift in technology. Here'a device with a touch screen so good, so accurate, so responsive that you can use it entirely without a stylus, unlike 98% of devices on the market at that time. It was a game changer.
The Apple Pencil is an optional stylus. You don't need it. You can use the iPad Pro without the Pencil. But with it, you can write naturally or be more precise.
In that sense, I don't think Steve's comments are completely out of sync with the existence of the Pencil?
Exactly this - often rolled out to take a cheap shot, by people who don't have a better argument. Steve's point was, he wanted a phone you could completely use without a stylus, not that styluses should never exist. If the Apple Pencil comes to the iPhone, it'll be an optional thing for people who want finer control over drawing, not something that one has to use instead of a finger.The video and quotes of Steve often get rolled out whenever the Apple Pencil is discussed. However, in defence of Tim Cook, I think people are too quick to jump to those quotes/video.
...
The Apple Pencil is an optional stylus. You don't need it. You can use the iPad Pro without the Pencil. But with it, you can write naturally or be more precise.
Correct. A stylus is the diamond tipped armature on a moving magnet or moving coil phono cartridge.A pen, a pencil, isn't a stylus.
Correct. A stylus is the diamond tipped armature on a moving magnet or moving coil phono cartridge.
Remember when Apple was innovative and Apple fans gleefully accused Samsung of stealing all their ideas? Doesn't feel so good to be an Apple fan does it? Not only that Apple takes 2 or 3 yrs to use those "ideas..." and have the gall to still call them "innovative."