Fakes within fakes within fakes!
craig0ry said:
As was stated earlier, you are missing the point! I don't think this is meant to be the creation of the ORIGINAL image, it's just a video to show you how EASY it would be to make that original image.
Makes sense to me--but we'd already shown by much MR discussion how it COULD be faked (I suggested that exact method with a 5G days ago), so demoing the discussion doesn't add anything to what we know about the original. The video then could be seen as merely more speculation rather than proof.
(But I actually think, from the "clever" editing, that the creator of this video intended to fool people into thinking it IS proof and into thinking it does document the original. Which it does NOT do--and which we caught almost immediately even before this thread was started--Kudos to iMeowbot

)
TMA said:
Yes there are many differences between the two but I think, as has been pointed out, the creator had to go back and do several steps again to make the video.
A good theory I agree--but only a theory. This video can't be taken as more than it is--it can't be taken as proof. Just a demo, and we can speculate about where the demo came from and why.
The original COULD have been faked. It's fishy (especially the barcode # and the awkward Chinese writing). Nobody should be getting any hopes up!! (Especially not about tablets and PDAs--if this is anything, it's "just" an iPod I'm sure.)
But last year's 5G image was "proven" fake by many people too. Most fakes are clearly agreed by ALL to be fake within a matter of hourse. This one is at the very least no EASY fake, despite the armchair Photoshoppers who call it one.
So I still don't think we have a definite answer either way. Suspicion, yes--a proven answer, no. This video certainly doesn't take us any closer than discussion from days ago. Nor is it the FIRST such reconstruction! Someone did a much simpler animated GIF version too. This COULD be the same guy who did the original, now doing a new slightly different fake just as an example, but it's even more fishy than the original

And "just an example" isn't as convincing as if he'd actually documented the original image itself.
Still... fakes within fakes within fakes! What could be more fun? I mean, apart from actually having a life on the weekend, which I can safely say none of us do
