Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I got the app on my iPhone but I didn't get to download the PC file yet since I'm at work. That file won't be a problem getting from the iTether developer's website right?
No, if not from one of the other locations that have it for download.



Michael
 
I did manage to test it out (I was trying to load the manual on their website which was just so over crowded still, because I didn't know how to work it) but I tried just plugging it in and opening both programs and it worked over 30 pin connector really easily, so then I tried micro usb and to my surprise/delight that too works!
Oh wow! Excellent. Also that you got it before it was pulled.

Personally I hope it was only pulled for the license check nonsense. I suspect there were a TON of complaints about that--especially when it did not work.



Michael
 
How does AT&T tell if you're using tethering apps?

I've read somewhere that tethering apps use a different APN than what cellular data uses. And this is what ATT is cracking down on. Anyone know how iTether pulls its data?? I have the unlimited data plan and use a LOT of data (streaming radio at work) and have never, ever received any type of letter/email/message on my data usage. I haven't noticed any type of throttling either.

So can anyone confirm how ATT cracks down on tethering??

attachment.php
 
Can confirm; it's already been pulled.

Just another sign of how ludicrous these carriers are for charging MORE MONEY to use the SAME CONNECTION on another device. US Telecom is awful.

Customers who use tethering will on average use more data per month than customers who don't use tethering, and therefore are more expensive.

You have a contract that gives you a certain amount of data per month. The carrier figures out how much data people on that contract use ever month on average, and that determines what these people cost the carrier per month, and then they add some profit margin, and that is what you are charged. If people who use tethering are added to the mix, then the average cost to the carrier, and therefore the average monthly charge go up for everybody. The way it works now, only people using tethering pay for the extra cost, and everybody who doesn't use tethering is quite happy with that.


I honestly think there should be a lawsuit against AT&T and there data/tether plans. I find it quite ridiculous that your paying $25 for 2GB of data and you can't choose the way you want to use that 2GB. You have to purchase a tether plan for an additional $20 to include 4GB of data? What about the users who use less then 2GB even with tether?

You don't pay for 2GB of data. You pay for the average amount of data that all the customers on the "up to 2GB, no tethering" plan are using, which is a lot less than 2GB. If AT&T sold an "up to 2GB with tethering" plan, then you would pay for the average amount of data that all the customers on the "up to 2GB with tethering" plan are using, which would be more data and therefore more expensive.


This is actually a valid point. You can easily dispute the chargers with whatever carrier you are on just by saying you thought it was OK because it was in the app store, so you were under the impression that if apple allows it, you thought the carrier allowed it too.

There's a problem with that. AT&T will not say "oh, you were naughty, now we charge you for tethering". AT&T will say "we notice you are tethering, so we put you on to the appropriate plan unless you stop doing it". So the carrier told you that it wasn't allowed, and they will probably be able to claim that any future tethering means you agree being put on the tethering plan. At that point you can't claim anymore that you thought it was allowed. For charges for past tethering you may be right, but they are not doing that.
 
Last edited:
Some people believe the earth is flat; and you should not believe them either. Their "servers" (I'm starting to think it is just one) are not able to handle simple 1.5MB downloads and license checks but are easily handling the huge amount of data that everyone using and testing the software have generated? C'mon now.

Well, I don't believe everything I read either. That is why I asked if anyone here has read an EULA. Also, you have no more evidence that data does not go through their systems than those that says it does. How do you know the systems are not bogged down because of tethered data? I don't personally care about data going through their systems. It is the user's choice to be fine with that. I just hate companies that collect information to sell to marketing research, for using a piece of their software you've paid for. Regardless, if you would have read my earlier post, I already have Handylight and from what I have read so far on this thread about iTether, I don't find it to be anything that I would use over handylight.
 
Customers who use tethering will on average use more data per month than customers who don't use tethering, and therefore are more expensive.

Because bits used by a computer are more expensive than bits used by an iPhone, right? :rolleyes:

Bits are bits, whether used on a computer or an iPhone. Let us use these bits the way WE WANT.
 
Well, I don't believe everything I read either. That is why I asked if anyone here has read an EULA. Also, you have no more evidence that data does not go through their systems than those that says it does.
Actually I do. It's rather trivial.

How do you know the systems are not bogged down because of tethered data? I don't personally care about data going through their systems. It is the user's choice to be fine with that. I just hate companies that collect information to sell to marketing research, for using a piece of their software you've paid for. Regardless, if you would have read my earlier post, I already have Handylight and from what I have read so far on this thread about iTether, I don't find it to be anything that I would use over handylight.
lol... I bought handylight and it is so far below iTether the very mention of it is laughable.



Michael
 
Actually I do. It's rather trivial.


lol... I bought handylight and it is so far below iTether the very mention of it is laughable.



Michael

And if I remember correctly, you had to press the colored bars in a certain sequence to even activate tethering. No such process needed to use iTether.
 
Well seeing as it is gone from the App Store and you can no longer buy it. Is it really stealing if you download it through Installous because it's there.

Yes, yes it is.

Just like downloading a Disney movie from TPB is "stealing", even though it isn't available for sale any more.

Or photocopying a book that isn't in print any more.

Yeah, with e-distribution, it's different, because at least with a movie or book, there is a secondary market for used copies; but such is the life of e-distribution. Glad I got it, hopefully it just got yanked due to the "disallowed third-party licensing", and when Tether gets that removed, it'll go back on.

But from what I can tell, the actual operation of it doesn't violate any of Apple's terms. Maybe your carriers, but not Apple's.
 
Not working for me. Getting client refused message on iPhone app. Running windows 7 boot camp on 2011 MacBook pro. Ip4 with atandt grandfathered unlimited plan in us.
 
Yes. It's not iTunes per se, but you need the supporting utilities that come with it.



Michael

thanks. i installed itunes on a thumb drive and it loaded. rebooted my pc w/o the thumb drive or itunes installled on the pc and it works! :D
 
Is anyone else having an issue where "the application tproxy has unexpectedly quit" when they open the tether application on their Mac? I cannot get the program I work and suspect that is why. Any suggestions? I have tied reinstalling the computer software to no avail.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.