Ray Bans here, works perfectly.Mine works with my Oakleys all the time.
Ray Bans here, works perfectly.Mine works with my Oakleys all the time.
Just a matter of time before Apple re-adopts fingerprint. If Apple wants good security, fingerprint offers it through continuous biometrics authentication. Every time you interact, you're being authenticated. This isn't possible with Face ID - not from a power perspective.
This isn't your grandpa's fingerprint tech. Today, ultrasonic fingerprint sensors can read the capillaries under the finger. The old myth about 1:50,000 odds no longer applies. Reading capillaries also means additional health features.
Imagine how boring and unexciting the iPhone 2019 is... all the rumours are for iPhone 2020 and 2021. Nice.
Not happening with tariffs looming. (For those of us in the USA at least)At this point the only excitement for 2019 will be if Apple regains its senses and lowers the price for the new iPhone to $699 for the top-end version and $499 for the entry-level.
If they use the three lenses in a innovative way, I would find that exciting...Perhaps. However, really, there isn't anything exciting about the 2019 iPhones based on what we know. An improved camera?
I can’t agree on that. Everyone I’ve shown it to thinks it’s cool and high-tec.Definitely got my vote in for the return of Touch ID. In fact, as much as some prefer Face ID over it, I suspect their sales have lagged not only because of exorbitant pricing, but also dislike of the Face ID technology.
I wouldn’t be surprised if this was more targeted at iPads than iPhones. Although our iPad Pro (9.7”) is primarily mine, my family uses it too. I can register several finger prints with TouchID, but doesn’t FaceID limit you to a max of two faces? On the other hand, my phone is much more private.
Apple will launch an iPhone equipped with both Face ID and an on-display fingerprint sensor in 2021, according to a new investor note by Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo and obtained by MacRumors.
![]()
Kuo's prediction is based on Apple's patents related to fingerprint on display (FOD) and the continued use of the technology in Android smartphones, which together suggest to him that Apple will opt to bring fingerprint scanning back to its smartphone screens.
Apple has effaced fingerprint recognition entirely in its flagship smartphone lineup, which includes the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and LCD-based iPhone XR. Chinese mobile vendors meanwhile have gone in the opposite direction and extended the adoption of in-display fingerprint sensing technology from their premium smartphones to mid-range models, where they've proved just as popular.
Apple was widely rumored to be attempting to integrate Touch ID under the display on 2017's iPhone X, but the company ditched any form of fingerprint scanning after hitting "early line of sight" with Face ID. However, Kuo argues that Face ID and FOD technologies are "complementary, not competitive," because multi-biometrics would offer authentication processes in circumstances where one or the other was inconvenient to use or simply unavailable.
Kuo believes that GIS and Qualcomm will benefit from iPhone's adoption of FOD, with the former providing the "large-area sensing ultrasonic" technology and the latter supplying the ultrasonic FOD module and lamination. Kuo also argues that the likelihood of FOD in iPhones will increase if Apple Watch supports a biometric function in the future.
Last month, Chinese media sources claimed Apple intends to launch a new iPhone for the budget-conscious Chinese market that features an under-display fingerprint sensor. However, those reports said the fingerprint scanning would replace rather than augment Face ID technology, which was deemed too expensive.
Barclays analysts also recently claimed that 2020 model iPhones will have acoustic fingerprint technology that could allow for full-screen Touch ID, following meetings with suppliers in Apple's Asian supply chain.
Before these reports, the consensus was that Apple is done with Touch ID in smartphones, despite having explored various in-display fingerprint scanner solutions in the past, including fingerprint sensing MicroLED displays. However, Touch ID has found a new lease of life on laptop keyboards, specifically in Apple's MacBook Pro range and the MacBook Air.
Article Link: Kuo: 2021 iPhone Will Feature Fingerprint-Sensing Display in Addition to Face ID
Apple has a low-cost iPhone almost ready, for the Chinese market.
It includes ONLY the under-display fingerprint sensor ... i.e., NO FaceID.
IMO, I believe Apple is hesitant to release it simply because the rest of the world would be clamoring for it !
If Apple makes a phone that has both technologies available, I would opt to use fingerprint-sensing over Face ID in every every single scenario, be that unlocking or Apple Pay.
Yeah, TouchID was great most the time and FaceID is great even more of the time (for me). Why is it a big deal to have both? Why are people getting upset about this?I have the 5S and XS max and am happy with both technologies. Seems to me that people are picking fights just to be in a fight.
Okay, but why? To me Face ID is much faster and more likely to work on the first try. I bought a $15 wireless charging cradle on Amazon and my phone stands up in it on my desk all day, so it's easy to unlock in that position (still on my desk). I don't care that it's staring at me all day. It is a little weird in public I guess holding the phone up to do Apple Pay stuff, but most places still don't accept that so I never use it.If Apple makes a phone that has both technologies available, I would opt to use fingerprint-sensing over Face ID in every every single scenario, be that unlocking or Apple Pay.
What... ? There's so much incorrect in what you just said, I'm not sure where to begin.Just a matter of time before Apple re-adopts fingerprint. If Apple wants good security, fingerprint offers it through continuous biometrics authentication. Every time you interact, you're being authenticated. This isn't possible with Face ID - not from a power perspective.
This isn't your grandpa's fingerprint tech. Today, ultrasonic fingerprint sensors can read the capillaries under the finger. The old myth about 1:50,000 odds no longer applies. Reading capillaries also means additional health features.
FaceID isn't going anywhere. I think it's fine to give people choice, but facial recognition/scanning is where everything is headed. In 10-20 years we'll all be continuously scanned in and outside of the home. I'm not sure if privacy fanatics should go ahead and have their nervous breakdown now or later.I much prefer they ditch the Face ID altogether.
Face ID was great in 2017,when under display touch ID technology wasn't available.
now it's available, and it's superior and much more ergonomic and convenient.
Very true. And possibly some large Corporate accounts.I do believe Koh is not the first to claim this, but he’s the only one that’ll be reported for saying it.....
Anyway the reason for this is because governments have apparently stated this type of security will be required for your phone to contain your passport info and act as your passport, not that I’d trust Apples security after recent revelations.
Very true. And possibly some large Corporate accounts.
The chain is only as strong as its weakest link. What’s the point of fingerprint scanner when Face ID is more secure and harder to hack? Finding your fingerprint is easier than getting 3D scan of your face.TouchID is bad when you have wet or dirty fingers or wear gloves it doesn't work at all. FaceID works always.
But it is nice if it has both, then you can choose..