Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t see problems with some of that. Leasing agreements? Not sure what Tesla does now, but at first they had NO leases, then they did a deal with a couple of banks. Apple certainly already has financial industry experience with wallet, Apple Pay, their own credit card, etc. Leasing and financing will be pretty easy for them.

Direct sales? Again, same as Tesla. Buy the apple car from your computer, iphone, ipad, etc., on the web, using the Apple Store app, or some new app for that purpose. Visit a show room to see the car and take a pre-scheduled test drive. Salesman can help you buy the car yourself using a handy iMac sitting in the showroom.

Building: many choices. Even old car companies use contract manufacturers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Contract_vehicle_manufacturers

Service is the big question mark.
I already proved you wrong on that point.
Mark my words I am right and you are wrong, sorry!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
You'd have possession and it'd be registered in your name (i.e. you'd own it). However, they'd have a caveat against it & be able to take ownership if you didn't pay.
Not true ownership until there is no lien and you have title. The bank owns it.
 
Tesla do not support CarPlay for a good reason. Tesla are set to make more money than Apple could hope for in the next decade. Simple maths shows that!

That is a ridiculous statement. Tesla, in Q4, made only $330M on nearly $9B revenue. That’s a tiny profit margin. Apple, in that quarter, made around $13B profit on $64B revenue.

To catch up, Tesla would need quarterly revenue of around $400B. That would mean they would need to sell about as much as the top five automakers combined, every quarter. Good luck with that.
 
except that ALL drivers are bad drivers who think they are better than they are.
All drivers can:
Get tired
Get angry
Drive too fast
Drive too aggressive
Pay little attention
Show no understanding of safety
I could go on..

A true FSD system will never have this drawbacks and whilst they will not be 100% safe they will be far safer than ANY human driver.
I agree most drivers think they are good, but they aren’t. Tesla self driving would be better for most drivers, agree.

I do however think I’m a better driver than most if for no other reason than I drive a manual and actually have to pay attention. Other very good drivers might be better than Tesla self driving for the foreseeable future in complex situations.
 
Except that by the time Apple decide to release anything it will be too late and they will not catch up, no matter how much money they have.
It’s never too late because people will always try to take your business. This includes Apple. Many, many stories of huge companies with enormous moats, cash, market dominance, etc only to have to chipped away over time.

Competition in the electric car market will be as fierce as the car market always has been. Batteries, self driving tech, etc will all be copied and could even be improved. Porsche already showed us they can release a better vehicle than the Model S...more expensive? Yeah, but it’s a Porsche...and it’s impressive.
 
Much push now for electric cars problem is no matter how hard media and car brands push for it the public is not ready to buy a $50-60 grand electric car with a battery that only goes 250-325 miles on a full charge.

The new Mustang Mach E extended battery only goes 300 max miles on a charge. What family wants to wait an hr on the road at a charging station waiting for it to re charge? Only to do the same 300 more miles down the road. Crazy!!

They MUST perfect the batteries better for at least 600 to 800 miles on a full charge before the mass public will start buying them and lower the cost of the vehicle as well. Until then gas vehicle will still be sold. Sure people are buying Tesla’s but not the mass public and that’s what car brands and mostly the media is pushing for.
exactly! we are huge into our road trips and even drove to visit my sister in Canada a few years ago....we live in Texas. Can't imagine having to stop every 250-300 miles to charge the car for a hour or 2 lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: WitchDoktor
As someone who owns a Tesla... yes, you will. You would be very surprised how very comfortable you get when you become accustomed to the autonomous capability of your car.
I suspect I would become comfortably dead if I trusted an autonomous car on UK roads. Aside from motorways and A roads, they are just too tricky. With today's technology at least.

I do have a modern vehicle with clever collision avoidance and pedestrian alerts (that's great) and adaptive cruise control (useful on a very long drive but can wind up other drivers on the road). I wouldn't trust a robot driver on some of the winding country roads where I live where unexpected things happen.
 
No, it depends on the state (at least in the US) and country. Maybe you’re confusing the lien holder with the legal owner?

Why is this relevant? Just curious
I was only curious about Tesla “ownership” comments bc I like to hear what people think ownership really means.

I don’t care what some technical definition says. If the bank can take away your car, you don’t own it. And in my state, you don’t have the title until the loan is paid, meaning you don’t really own it.
 
I was only curious about Tesla “ownership” comments bc I like to hear what people think ownership really means.

I don’t care what some technical definition says. If the bank can take away your car, you don’t own it. And in my state, you don’t have the title until the loan is paid, meaning you don’t really own it.
Ahhh, so you don’t really own it if you’re making payments, like a house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
We are quite a way off self driving cars being good enough, but it's not unreasonable to assume they will get there someday. When that happens, here's my prediction of where it will eventually go to:
- They will become so safe that it becomes illegal for human driving cars to operate anywhere except on special tracks
- They will be so extraordinarily good, and have a network of communication with each other, so that cars will be capable of driving near on bumper to bumper at high speeds on motorways to save on fuel due to the slipstreaming, and road construction costs due to less lanes required.
 
I was only curious about Tesla “ownership” comments bc I like to hear what people think ownership really means.

I don’t care what some technical definition says. If the bank can take away your car, you don’t own it. And in my state, you don’t have the title until the loan is paid, meaning you don’t really own it.
who cares? why is this an argument in this thread? lol

majority of people on this site "make payments" towards their iPhones, so technically barely anyone here "owns" one. Do you "make payments" on your iPhone?? just curious of course...no hidden meaning behind this question. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
exactly! we are huge into our road trips and even drove to visit my sister in Canada a few years ago....we live in Texas. Can't imagine having to stop every 250-300 miles to charge the car for a hour or 2 lol

Ah, so now it takes *two* hours to charge a car to 300 miles.

Sure.

Folks, if you stop every two or three hours to pee, just stop at a supercharger, charge for 15 minutes, and be on your way. It’s really not a big deal.
 
Ah, so now it takes *two* hours to charge a car to 300 miles.

Sure.

Folks, if you stop every two or three hours to pee, just stop at a supercharger, charge for 15 minutes, and be on your way. It’s really not a big deal.
who stops every 2 hours to pee?? also, this will only work if you are on a main highway. you think the backroads of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado are gonna have a supercharger that charges in 15 minutes? get real lol
 
I see it ALL completely differently.

Has nothing to do with anything but "playing those who play the market".

Apple was jealous of the multiple that Netflix got, so they went after streaming media content market, via AppleTV+.

And, they got the multiple they desired WITHOUT having to deliver !

Their biggest hit to date is See.

Now, they are jealous of the multiple that Tesla has received, & want a piece of that action.

I believe they believe they may get rewarded just for the Rumors of getting into the market, somewhere down the line.

It's ALL just more of the same: "Blue Horseshoe loves Anacott Steel".

Rumors like this tend to come out when Apple Execs are worried about iPhone Unit Sales numbers.
 
who stops every 2 hours to pee?? also, this will only work if you are on a main highway. you think the backroads of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado are gonna have a supercharger that charges in 15 minutes? get real lol

Ok. Stretch your legs. Whatever.

And since nobody lives in Montana or Wyoming, the lack of sales there won’t hurt anybody.

That said, there are plenty of super chargers in all of those states. So “get real,” too.

Here are the current supercharger locations.

992B62BB-4B9D-4E69-B4AC-01786F0C7C80.jpeg
 
That is likely true, but in the mean time there’s no need to volunteer to be a guinea pig.

In any event, I doubt “self driving” will be the main focus of apple car.

In the timeline we're talking now, self driving can't be the main focus of the car. It'd be like introducing a mass market vehicle in 2020 and bragging that it has an automatic transmission. Uh, yeah, of course it does - 95% of people wouldn't buy it if it didn't.
 
Ok. Stretch your legs. Whatever.

And since nobody lives in Montana or Wyoming, the lack of sales there won’t hurt anybody.

That said, there are plenty of super chargers in all of those states. So “get real,” too.

Here are the current supercharger locations.

View attachment 1702098
that means you have to modify your trip JUST so you can charge your car. If you do a route you normally go and it doesn't have a charger, then you have to modify the trip completely and put you in an area you wouldn't otherwise go adding on time to your trip. Again, if you're main highway driving, then sure it won't be a problem, but not everyone sticks to the main highways. It's just not realistic at this point to act like you can drive anywhere in the USA and there's a supercharger available. I can't imagine going on a trip and having to plan the entire drive based on where a supercharger would be.
 
that means you have to modify your trip JUST so you can charge your car. If you do a route you normally go and it doesn't have a charger, then you have to modify the trip completely and put you in an area you wouldn't otherwise go adding on time to your trip. Again, if you're main highway driving, then sure it won't be a problem, but not everyone sticks to the main highways. It's just not realistic at this point to act like you can drive anywhere in the USA and there's a supercharger available. I can't imagine going on a trip and having to plan the entire drive based on where a supercharger would be.

If you are driving more than 300 miles, you are almost certainly on a road that has a supercharger. Very few trips are >300 miles. And a tiny percentage of those are on routes that don’t intersect super chargers. That’s how Tesla chose where to place them.

As for “planning,” you simply enter your destination into the car’s nav, and it tells you where to go, and suggests which super chargers to stop at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaymc
who stops every 2 hours to pee?? also, this will only work if you are on a main highway. you think the backroads of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado are gonna have a supercharger that charges in 15 minutes? get real lol

The 50 mile stretch of backroads don't need a supercharger because it's only 50 miles long. You'll drive from one end to the other and be able to drive for another 200 miles.

Every Tesla vehicle can recover at least 75 miles from a Supercharger in 5 minutes. So recovering energy for that little backroad jaunt will only take 3 minutes, max. Model 3 and Y can do it in closer to 2 minutes.

Talking about how those backroads don't have superchargers is like talking about how there's gaps between gas stations that are 30+ miles long between Vegas and LA - that's fine, people will stop for gas before or after the gap.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.