Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, and they gonna make a 5 minutes video about how fast the new port is compared to last year's iPhone. We gonna see a lot of surprised faces of users and developers. I don't think that they would compare it with Android phones about transfer speeds.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Gudi
I’d bet the non-pros get usb 3 w’out thunderbolt and the pros get thunderbolt/usb4 personally, I doubt it’ll be thunderbolt across the line, I do hope they dont decide to be exceptionally petty and stick the non pros with usb 2.0, that would be absurd

There won't be Thunderbolt. iPhones aren't opening up DMA to PCIe.
 
Why support data transfer at all on the non-pros's? 99.99% of non-pro owners probably never connect their phone to a pc or Mac for data transfer.

Technically I do wonder what it means. As the SoC will presumably be the same, it sounds like it is more licensing/royalty issue to disable certain "hardware" features?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyanite
Well, if Apple had wanted, iPhone cable ports would have been much faster for a very long time - with Lightning connector.

They did it for iPads:


 
Why support data transfer at all on the non-pros's? 99.99% of non-pro owners probably never connect their phone to a pc or Mac for data transfer.

Technically I do wonder what it means. As the SoC will presumably be the same, it sounds like it is more licensing/royalty issue to disable certain "hardware" features?
I think the iPhone 15 (non pro) will get the A16 SoC and the iPhone 15 Pro will get a A17 SoC. So the A17 would support USB 3.X speeds.
 
Honestly it's been embarrassing that iPhone's still use USB 2.0 since 2016, 2018, 2020, etc.
The fact that in Fall 2023 only the high end iPhones will get to take advantage of a data transfer protocol that is over a decade old now is just... gross. Stop penny pinching Tim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
What a world we live in. 😂 100+ comments on a new port and cable on a phone.

I presume there are some people who need the faster speeds, especially those filming Videos on iPhone, but as Apple sales reflect - everyone almost buys the Pro models nowadays - ever wonder how many of the iPhone users care about USB-C/Thunderbolt?

I think it's safe to assume, that a few will be thrilled and impacted by this, mostly others will not care that much unless USB-C on iPhone will become another symbol of status 😁
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyanite
While all iPhone 15 models are going to feature USB-C ports instead of Lightning ports, the faster transfer speeds will be limited to the iPhone 15 Pro models. Standard iPhone 15 models will continue to feature USB 2.0 speeds, the same as Lightning.

Apple: "forcing us to use USB-C is bad for progress and competition"
Nah, we like to keep our ecosystem on a leach. We give our customers the best technology there is ... as long as you buy pro ... and upgrade each two/ three years.
 
Bit of a dodgy “F U consumer” move, and all three customers still using their cable for data transfers will be very disappointed.
 
I think the iPhone 15 (non pro) will get the A16 SoC and the iPhone 15 Pro will get a A17 SoC. So the A17 would support USB 3.X speeds.

A14 iPad Air already supports USB 3.1.

For iPhone 15, Apple gets to save a few dimes by using USB 2.0 repeaters and redrivers. There is no technical limitation. This is all about saving money.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: JapanApple
Thats good but terrible at the same time...

They should support the fastest speeds on the Pro's, but allow at least basic USB 3.0 speeds on the standard models.
I think the reason here is pretty simple. Lower end iPhones are going to be using the A16 chip of this year and I am guessing doesn’t support USB 3.0 speeds. A17 will be a new chip and it will. Hence Pro’s get this, non-Pro’s miss out.

I don’t see an issue, I don’t copy any data over USB really anyway but the people that are most likely to do that will probably buy a Pro model.

What’s interesting here is they mention 15 Pro Max. Other rumours suggest it’ll be a 15 Ultra.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyanite
I think the reason here is pretty simple. Lower end iPhones are going to be using the A16 chip of this year and I am guessing doesn’t support USB 3.0 speeds. A17 will be a new chip and it will. Hence Pro’s get this, non-Pro’s miss out.

I don’t see an issue, I don’t copy any data over USB really anyway but the people that are most likely to do that will probably buy a Pro model.

What’s interesting here is they mention 15 Pro Max. Other rumours suggest it’ll be a 15 Ultra.

A14 and A15 already support 3.1.
 
If you find this thread interesting, then you might also find the following thread interesting:

Or maybe when people come to threads to pimp their own threads elsewhere, I might not find it interesting. That might just be me.
 
It would be so petty from Apple if they limit the USB-C to 2.0 speeds.
Maybe, but it does require different hardware support, so it’s not like it’s necessarily, say, a software limitation.

that the iPhone 15 will not include a cable in the box
It might not. The EU legislation makes it optional, though. Personally I’d prefer they didn’t, but I realize that this is an emotional topic ;)

You pay extra for heated seats to be activated in a car even though in many cases the circuitry is already there.
Wasn’t there actually not just this one example of that, being reported not long ago? Now it’s “in many cases”?

Heck, considering the kinds of video codecs the current iPhones already support, including ProRes, it IS dumbfounding that said USB 3 Lightning connector hasn’t found its way into the Pro models, or even ALL models, already.
The vast majority don’t use those, though.

Is there any relationship between any USB(-C) standard and charging speed?
Well, it requires USB PD, but that’s independent of USB data transfer standards. PD uses other pins to communicate.

Is there a way to get all the music on my current phone to the new phone without using the PC?
iTunes Match or Apple Music, and let the music match or upload on the existing device.

We give our customers the best technology there is ... as long as you buy pro
Isn’t that pretty much what the pro-line of devices are by definition? Everywhere?

A9X supports USB 3.0 as evidenced by the first Gen 12.9 inch iPad Pro so yeah
Well, maybe. But that iPad has extra hardware to support ”double sided” Lightning (regular is single side), so it’s not just the SoC at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thisismattwade
Thats good but terrible at the same time...

They should support the fastest speeds on the Pro's, but allow at least basic USB 3.0 speeds on the standard models.
But EU’s regulations don’t say anything about data transfer speeds.

This is their tried and true product segmentation strategy that we’ve seen expand every year since iPhones X and 8 launched and as the smartphone market has kept maturing.

I don’t know why anyone is expecting Apple to go in the opposite direction every year.

Less and less high end specs for SE and mid-tier iPhones, more and more reserved for Pro iPhones.

That’s the only way to maintain annual growth. So that’s the way it is.

And it certainly won’t change as long as Tim Cook is in control and turning as good a profit from it as he is.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Shirasaki
You obviously don’t understand analyst lingo. Do you think he calls up suppliers like a Gallup poll? Of course not. Kuo surveys individual employees working for Apple suppliers. Not every employee will adhere 100% to an NDA. Money, drinks, and steak dinners buy a lot of loose lips.

Every year, he’s proven to be accurate. This spring, he predicted A15 for iPhone 14. Some people swore up and down it would never happen and now they’re all eating crow.
Did he predict one more GPU core and 6GB RAM package? If not, he knew nothing about the chip for iPhone 14. From the size of factory orders some basic knowledge can be inferred, such as that a few million chips are still produced on 5nm not 4nm. From that you can draw a lucky conclusion, but that's not the same as having intimate knowledge of Apple's plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tICM
Literally the only people that care are people that do a lot of digital video editing and those people will buy the pro model.
You literally ignore the people who transfer large size or data frequently, such as offline music library and video library, to watch on the go or whatnot.
So what. You need differentiation between the tiers of phones. You pay extra for heated seats to be activated in a car even though in many cases the circuitry is already there.

The last time I plugged my phone into my computer with a cable was to Jailbreak it I think.
Tim Cook: iPhone 15 Pro Max will not come with phone call capability except for calling emergency services. Subscribe to Apple One and you can call anyone anywhere without restrictions.

Why bother selling iPhone? Just lease out those iPhone and people pay different tier to unlock certain features. How about $1.99/day to unlock App Store? $2.99/day to unlock phone call and sms app. $9.99/day to use camera app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JPack
Well, if Apple had wanted, iPhone cable ports would have been much faster for a very long time - with Lightning connector.

They did it for iPads:


Yes, but artificial product segmentation comes before streamlining products as it’s a good way to push consumers up another step on the value ladder, or just get you to buy a more expensive configuration for no other reason than Apple having artificially disabled certain features on the baseline configuration.

This is seen with nearly all modern Apple products.

Like Apple and its fanboys say, “you spent so little so you clearly don’t need the thing that was cut anyway. People that really need x, y, and z would spend whatever we’ve set the price to on the models that habe x, y, and z. If you don’t have $999+ then you only need the features that $429 or $799 can get you.”
 
Did he predict one more GPU core and 6GB RAM package? If not, he knew nothing about the chip for iPhone 14. From the size of factory orders some basic knowledge can be inferred, such as that a few million chips are still produced on 5nm not 4nm. From that you can draw a lucky conclusion, but that's not the same as having intimate knowledge of Apple's plans.

Yes and yes.
 
This guy is rarely right in his predictions (remember how he said new MacBook Pro M2 in September, then October, then November, then when none of those happened he changed his random guess to next year).

And who cares? When was the last time most transferred anything via a cable on their iPhone.

The current iPhone has WiFi 6. Future ones may skip the 6E and go right to 7. As it, it supports transfer speeds faster than most of your computer hard drives do. Gigs of videos transfers in seconds.
Typical response of “huh, I never connect my phone to a computer so EVERYONE ELSE must follow my suite and embrace portless and wireless“ regardless of wireless performance, stability, battery consumption etc etc.

airdrop was great until it was not. Sidecar connected wirelessly got disconnected shortly (less than 2 min) after being connected almost all the time when “idle” when it is supposed to not do so. Apple still can’t make sure to lock in the correct Wifi signal unless device is literally next to the router (no, it’s not a router problem. Windows PC handles it nicely). Wifi 6? What’s that?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.