If real, the board has three separate PCBs for connectors (it doesn't) or it uses mechanically unsound connectors (it doesn't). If it's a prototype, it still makes no sense. If it's a mock-up, it would not be plugged in, would it?
Uhm with all due respects, I don't think that's conclusive. Look at the shot I took from some old PC. Connectors all over the place - internally it does not use riser cards, but elevated connectors with metal supports relieving the soldered contacts from mechanical strain. Obviously this is mechanically sound enough, since about any ATX PC looks similar.
My take on the "new Mac mini":
Sadly it is a fake, for three reasons:
- AFAIK we have yet to see a prototype of any future Apple product finding its way out of Infinite Loop. The Powermac prototype PCB, the Pippin and the MBA prototype were all discovered long after the products had shipped.
- To include both mini-DVI and mini-DP makes absolutely no sense. DP->DVI adapters are available - and to connect the computer to any DVI-Monitor, you'll need an adapter anyway, so why bother with DVI? (besides it's not very Apple-like).
The only explanation (and sadly, I could not find any in-depth specs for the 9400 M) would be if the GPU was able to drive two displays, but only one 30" and the other limited to single-channel DVI. THEN, the distinction would make perfect sense as mini-DP would be the designated primary connector and DVI the one for smaller displays.
- Apple Legal has not summoned their killer-droids serving cease-and-desist orders left & right.
I am no disturbed by the oldish look, because the Mini survived the PPC->intel transition without a facelift, let alone a redesign. Same goes for the PowerMac/Mac pro. The Mini was always loved by buyers and neglected by Apple, so it could easily keep its looks for years.
Unibody is unlikely. This is an extremely expensive process geared at providing strong, durable, yet light enclosures at a very negative enviromental footprint. Doesn't make sense for a desktop machine.
Alu/black design is not so likely either - black is used mainly around the display which the Mini lacks and at back panels and parts. It would look strangely depressive as the top plate of the little guy.
However, the self-proclaimed Photoshop gurus pointing to disturbed macroblocks and micropixels and artefacts here but missing there now have some egg all over their faces - obviously, the blurry image was not a p'shop after all.
All said and done, the image and vid aroused my curiosity, but I am 90% convinced this is nothing like the new Mini.