Ok MS. I'm sold I'm going to sell off all my Mac's and buy a Windows PC. Oh wait, you don't make a PC. 
OK - so buy a PC. Then replace the tower unit if you want to upgrade and were too dumb to buy something with a simple upgrade path.
Or buy an iMac - and then a year later replace the whole thing including the 27" display.
Are you insane?
The only reason they're in the forum bating you guys is because they have no life and likely no job (otherwise, where do they find the time?). Ask them if they got lost on the Internets. Tell them that Internet Explorer must not be telling them that their at a Mac-specific site. The only other reason would be that they are really Steve Balmer trying a pathetic gorilla campaign to win back converts, much like the new ad campaign and stores.
Also, tell them that they should go apply at the Microsoft Store for work if they are unemployed, but be sure to explain that there is a square dance requirement with the job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSAXEVXvNz8&feature=youtube_gdata
No, you should just use the digital copy of the movie that is being included in nearly every major release these days. Not to mention, at least a few studios are shipping their new releases as dual-disc, with Blu-Ray and DVD discs as well as a digital copy. This will become standard practice very quickly, until DVD is in its final days as a widespread, popular format (which will be many years from now).
http://www.amazon.com/Iron-Blu-ray-Combo-Digital-Copy/dp/B0021L8V1Q
http://www.amazon.com/Kick-Ass-Two-Disc-Blu-ray-Combo-Digital/dp/B002ZG9846
So I emailed a fellow IT colleague of mine ( yep, you guessed it - another Mac user ) and was writing about the winbloze huggers ( I was admonished for using the word "windoze" earlier by a PC idiot) trolling this forum. I found his reply quite hysterical and wanted to share.
Yeah, people leaping to defend Windows at every mention irritate me, too, but you're not helping your case by saying things like 'Micro$oft' and 'Windoze' (WinBlows, whatever). (And no, I'm not a PC fanboy; I hate Windows/PCs.)
So I emailed a fellow IT colleague of mine ( yep, you guessed it - another Mac user ) and was writing about the winbloze huggers ( I was admonished for using the word "windoze" earlier by a PC idiot) trolling this forum. I found his reply quite hysterical and wanted to share.
I think it's more the use of "winbloze" and "windoze" that made you look ridiculous. Plus calling people an "idiot" for their opinion is in very bad taste. When you read posts on this site (or any for that matter) that are not 100% pro-apple on each and every issue it doesn't necessarily mean they are a "windows hugger" as you put it.
I own a Macbook, and a PC with Linux and windows on it. I use Windows for my work simply because OSX doesn't have the specialized software I need and there aren't any alternatives at this moment. I use Linux and OSX during my personal time because I find it fun to use something different and I enjoy the software they have to offer (I still use Windows for gaming for obvious reasons).
Do you really need to be so malevolent towards guys like me? Saying we are PC huggers or idiots or don't have a job, really? Is that how you conduct yourself in public or among friends?
So much FUD on that site.
Apart from the Blu Ray Player, TV tuner, the rest is either personal opinion or just plain wrong. Macs don't share as well for example, anyone who has ever tried hooking a Windows PC to a wifi network I'm sure will testify against that.
"Apple's productivity suite file formats won't open in Microsoft Office on PCs. This can be a real hassle for Mac users sharing work documents with PC users."
Apparently Microsoft forgot they make Office for Mac.
I second that - I have two PC's on the network through an airport extreme - it is a crap shot whether the laptop detects the upstairs desktop computer and yet funny enough with my two apple computers using AFP/Bonjour my iMac always appears on the network without any problems. If I had a dollar for every time I heard people complain about interoperability issues between not only Windows of the same generation but intergeneration compatibility issues I'd be able to buy Microsoft. Maybe Microsoft should actually fix their operating system instead of creating nonsense about a competitor.
Oh, and not only do they forget about Office for Mac but they also forget iWork and Lotus Symphony too. The last time I checked, Lotus Symphony was a free download and does everything an end user would need plus free downloadable templates off the website as well.
I have two PC's on the network through an airport extreme...
Have you considered the possibility that the Apple Airport Extreme is perhaps the problem?
Which OS are the running? My computers all work very well together running Windows 7 on Homegroup
Have you considered the possibility that the Apple Airport Extreme is perhaps the problem?
My various Windows systems (Server 2003, WinXP, Vista, 7) get along fine with my Linksys B/G wireless + GbE wired network.
The only issue I have is that the laptops fall back to "B" speed when I'm in the east garden patio - but I think that's because the kitchen (thus the refrigerator, dual oven, stove etc) is between the east garden patio and the access point in the office. No problems in the north garden patio or any other part of the house.
I can't even get Windows 7 to detect a ubiquity nanostation half the time. Airport is not the problem.
(If you don't know whats so special about a ubiquity, they're 2-3x more powerful than a consumer grade wireless and you have to have a permit to operate one)
One of the Tweets in the Twitter feed on that site (the second one that came up for me):
"so apparently it's time to upgrade my laptop to win 7 with a fresh install... it's running really SLOW! right now..."
Wow. Advertising FAIL!
Agreed; unfortunately people seem to want to blame Airport for Microsofts inability to create a protocol that doesn't royally suck. If iFolder works, AFP works, NFS works then there should be SMB to be failing to work between two Windows 7 machines.
One thing that annoys the hell out of me about OS X (besides containing 6 or 7 different interface styles) is that you can't switch between documents on the desktop by pressing the first letter of the title like you can with Win 7. On OS X it'll jump to some random document and then refuse to advance to any other one.![]()
Uh... are you sure? I'm pretty sure I've done that before.
So I emailed a fellow IT colleague of mine ( yep, you guessed it - another Mac user ) and was writing about the winbloze huggers ( I was admonished for using the word "windoze" earlier by a PC idiot) trolling this forum. I found his reply quite hysterical and wanted to share.
Oh snap! I am convinced. I am going back to windoze now. I am selling my Macs on Craigslist. I have too much free time now that I don't have to troubleshoot a windoze driver issue or something.
Positive.
Still here? Nice! Google images is a great resource. Hey don't stop with your Macs, why don't you post a pic of your gulfstream, yacht, mansion, ferrari, playboy centerfold girlfriend, etc. for all to see? It's none of your business what Macs I own. "And you can tell that, home boy!" ( Antoine Dodson)
This is a Mac specific site, at least I masterfully deduced that from the name "Mac Rumors". Call me crazy, but if someone that likes windows comes to a Mac forum to tell all Mac users windows is better than OSX, isn't that some form of idiocy? I have worked with windows extensively in my past. I had a MSDN license for a number of years. My opinions of windows being crap are not off base because I have witnessed their "third-rate products" (gee who said that?) poorly perform in a corporate environment over the years. I am not calling people that use windows idiots just those windoze users that want to intrude a Mac forum to tell Mac users that windows is really better than OSX. I have zero headaches now that I use Linux and OSX. It boggles my mind how someone can say with a straight face how windows is more stable than Linux or OSX.