Cook's strategy has shafted the share price recently so let's hope it's not a full recall - much as I like a "buying opportunity" I prefer the execs to keep the share price rising in a steady manner and QA isn't rocket science.
I prefer a company such as Apple to focus on products and on the customer not on keeping the share price to help fund the luxury lifestyles of the rich shareholders
[doublepost=1507155214][/doublepost]
Not bitter, but turn about fair play as far as I'm concerned when "Apple people" constantly use the Note 7 battery issue as a platform why the iPhone is so much better.
That's because it is better
[doublepost=1507155325][/doublepost]
How does Apple screw up a phone that is basically the same as the last 3 phones. New camera and a glass back, and jack up the price. And they still manage to create a massive flaw.
Can't wait to see the issues with the X. I'll pass.
I don't call 5 units out of millions a screw up. I also don't call 5 units not catching fire or exploding a screw up . I would go on but I doubt you have the intelligence to comprehend.
Much like a Boeing 747 - way over your head
[doublepost=1507155397][/doublepost]
Wow, Timmy really does copy every single thing Samsung does.
Apart form the fires, exploding phones, full recall and denial then issue the phone again a second time with same flaws in and then complain about the cost. So yes really is the same /s
[doublepost=1507155588][/doublepost]
That's a ridiculous defense. So because it takes the iPhone 8 twice the amount of the time to have the same number of reported failures, it's less of a problem?? I didn't know that dangerous situations were rated by events/day.
it does matter in that if it takes far longer for some iPhones to show up as affected then it means that there are high numbers of iPhones unaffected. Therefore that equates to a high yield rate and therefore a low failure rate.
Thus relatively few units that could have the battery pop out.
Compared to Samsun though where high failure rates were occurring.
Plus we only know about 5 units so far and are still waiting to see what happens. A bit early to criticise yet therefore.
You seem to want to call the fire brigade out before the fire has even started
[doublepost=1507155706][/doublepost]
You are right, what am I thinking.
Nothing to see here, MR. Stop trolling everyone!
So you admit you are trolling then? lol
[doublepost=1507155777][/doublepost]
I find it hilarious that they are saying there are only 5 incidents and that it isn't a big deal compared to the Note 7 when with the Note 7 at this same point in time after release it was only half a dozen or less incidents that quickly escalated to hundreds. And as I recall these same writers blasted Samsung when it was at the half a dozen or less mark, yet Apple gets a pass? I don't think so, Apple should be called out on the table on this one, although I will given them that at least the phones aren't catching on fire and I am guessing that Apple learned from Samsung's mistake and designed the phones to split open like this when there is a battery problem so it doesn't crush the battery and start a fire, so that is a plus.
So you basically are wanting us all to lambast Apple for learning from Samsung's faults?