Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No he said android colour management was terrible. The last time I checked Samsung was an android phone. This has nothing to do with you anyway.

Yes he said android colour management was terrible.

53578907a3fabdddf66e6837dbd5baa2.jpg


But that’s not what you started to argue.

Quit making things up. You want to defend Samsung go ahead, you don’t have to put words in people’s mouth to accomplish that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: realtuner
He's got his apple sheep glasses on... No display comes close to samsung and its likely never changing.

Apple do a great job surg their screens but still not as good as Samsung displays
Exactly it is well known that Samsung have the best displays.
[doublepost=1555605573][/doublepost]
Yes he said android colour management was terrible.

53578907a3fabdddf66e6837dbd5baa2.jpg


But that’s not what you started to argue.

Quit making things up. You want to defend Samsung go ahead, you don’t have to put words in people’s mouth to accomplish that.
The displays on Samsung phones are terrible. Not Samsung phones themselves. You are now putting words into my own mouth. You are only highlighting the part that you want to bully and argue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Exactly it is well known that Samsung have the best displays.
[doublepost=1555605573][/doublepost]
The displays on Samsung phones are terrible. Not Samsung phones themselves. You are now putting words into my own mouth. You are only highlighting the part that you want to bully and argue.

I haven’t done anything of the sort.
I have just shared your posts with your words trying to argue with another poster over something they never said but you in fact did.

No one is bullying you, you don’t need to make stuff up when you obviously made a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: realtuner
Imagine paying $2k on a phone just to have it break. Great quality control you got there Samsung.
I would cry, sob...and have a meltdown. BUT..I'd gather myself together and return it...for a full refund. IF I still liked Samsung, exchange it for that big S10 thing. Then...just wait until they improve this technology.
 
One of the reviewer indicated that the film seems to be indicated as being removable. And consumers are already trained to remove some plastic layer off their electronics. If it’s not supposed to be removed, then it should’ve been sealed/fixed to the screen as part of the manufacturing process.

It is embarrassing for a $2000 device to be “broken” simply because of a thin piece of screen protector being removed. Obviously there’s another underlying issue here.

Taking off the outer screen protector, is probably not the reason the screens internals stop working.
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
Screen folding and flexing is the most useless tech ever made by human

Concave TV? Meeeh.. immersive my @**.. it makes me puking instead
Curve edged display? Add unnecessary distortion, and useless implementation

The only thing useful for folding the display is like the iPhone X where you can fold the edge and hiding it so you can have the thinnest bezel possible.
 
AirPods, lte Apple Watch, 3d facial recognition don’t really count. /s

Btw can’t call it innovation if it doesn’t actually work.

Wireless earbuds and smart watches already existed before Apple entered those categories. Good products, but they were not the innovators or at least first to market. I guess I'll give you 3d facial recognition but 2d facial recognition already existed. Apple is more of a company that takes other companies innovations and usually improves on them and markets them very well.

The fold clearly works it's just easy to break and isn't very refined. I think that should have been expected and would say it was released too early clearly wasn't ready for the masses. Probably should be sold as a prototype or beta device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
It may seem like that on the surface but how do you know what goes on behind apples closed doors? They won’t create something u TIL it’s ready. Samsung should never have sold this. Yes they’re trying but try in your r&d department not with the general consumer.

Agreed, it's not ready to be a mass product I also don't think it has been introduced with that intent either. Most people aren't throwing down 2G for a smartphone.

Probably should be sold as a prototype or beta device if that even makes sense.
 
Apple is more of a company that takes other companies innovations and usually improves on them and markets them very well.

What innovations did Apple take from others to make their A-Series processors? Funny that ARM, Samsung or Qualcomm aren’t even close to Apples processors. Did Apple jump a couple years into the future to steal their ideas?
 
Wireless earbuds and smart watches already existed before Apple entered those categories. Good products, but they were not the innovators or at least first to market. I guess I'll give you 3d facial recognition but 2d facial recognition already existed. Apple is more of a company that takes other companies innovations and usually improves on them and markets them very well.

The fold clearly works it's just easy to break and isn't very refined. I think that should have been expected and would say it was released too early clearly wasn't ready for the masses. Probably should be sold as a prototype or beta device.

Wireless headphones and smart watches were both categories before apple launched either the Apple Watch or airpods. But let’s be honest apple came in and redefined both categories and thats what innovation is.

Your thinking about invention, it’s not the same as innovation. Common misconception.

There still aren’t any wireless headphones that work as well as the AirPods. And the Apple Watch, don’t think there are any competitors that allow to you leave your phone at home and continue to make and receive calls, messages, and stream music from their smart watch, when paired with airpods. That’s innovation.

Apples 3d Face ID system can’t be compared to a single camera, that’s not very accurate.

You do realize taking what someone else started with and making it better isn’t as easy as you make it out to be. Google buying Motorola is one example.

You can’t give Samsung a handicap for releasing a prototype device as a Flagship.
It will damage the brand. Not for fans that appreciate Samsung failed attempt, but by affluent consumers who actually end up buying the device and then swear off Samsung and the galaxy line of phones because of it.

Apple and Huawei might gain more than a few customers because of it.
 
The fold clearly works it's just easy to break and isn't very refined. I think that should have been expected and would say it was released too early clearly wasn't ready for the masses. Probably should be sold as a prototype or beta device.

Yup - a $2000 prototype/beta device that you should expect to break, because, well folding displays are understandably hard. I'm sure huge number of people would be all about that.
 
The A-series processors mentioned above?

Add to that the T Series used in Macs, the W Series and H Series for Bluetooth/headphones and the S Series for the Apple Watch (the latest S4 being a 64bit processor).

Imagine that - a 64bit processor on your wrist. Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon 3100 for watches (which came out the same time as Apple Watch 4) still uses old A7 32bit cores and doesn't even support Bluetooth 5. It's actually quite embarrassing when placed alongside the S4 in the Apple Watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
Mark Gruman really needs to redact his post on Bloomberg. The MORON removed the film ASSUMING it was a screen protector just like MKHD did and guess what BOTH their units became faulty rapidly after.

LIke how many phones ship with a screen protector already installed? Not many .... I recall the Sony Xperia Z1-Z5 series did ... and I've heard OPPO or One 5T did but very rare in the industry to do this ... installed or even ship with a screen protector.
 
What innovations did Apple take from others to make their A-Series processors? Funny that ARM, Samsung or Qualcomm aren’t even close to Apples processors. Did Apple jump a couple years into the future to steal their ideas?
They took my chip design methodology from Exponential->EVSX->Intrinsity and AMD.

(Just kidding. I have no idea what methodology they use, and can only guess based on the fact that i used to work with many of the chip designers there).
[doublepost=1555610872][/doublepost]
Mark Gruman really needs to redact his post on Bloomberg. The MORON removed the film ASSUMING it was a screen protector just like MKHD did and guess what BOTH their units became faulty rapidly after.

LIke how many phones ship with a screen protector already installed? Not many .... I recall the Sony Xperia Z1-Z5 series did ... and I've heard OPPO or One 5T did but very rare in the industry to do this ... installed or even ship with a screen protector.

No, he assumed it was like the plastic wrap that comes on EVERY phone. Every iPhone I’ve ever bought has a plastic wrap around it that you are supposed to peel off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFR and realtuner
What innovations did Apple take from others to make their A-Series processors? Funny that ARM, Samsung or Qualcomm aren’t even close to Apples processors. Did Apple jump a couple years into the future to steal their ideas?

Because average consumers care about processor improvements? Macrumors nerds ya but ask at least 80% of iphone owners they have no clue and are not basing there purchase on a new processor. These are also improvements on an exist product. Not new.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Because average consumers care about processor improvements? Macrumors nerds ya but ask at least 80% of iphone owners they have no clue and are not basing there purchase on a new processor. These are also improvements on an exist product. Not new.

Irrelevant. I was just listing an area (just one of many) where Apple is way ahead of everyone else.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.