Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Would love some advice on which MP to purchase. Debating between both newest models of the MBA and MBP. Currently have a MBP from 2012 so these two new models are intriguing to say the least. I'm a teacher that uses quite a few apps at once. I'm pretty techy and understand most things, but processor talk makes my brain hurt LOL. Would need more storage and RAM thats for sure. But not sure if one version is better than the other, and would love some suggestions from you all, that from your comments seem to know than I do. Thanks in advance!
Without knowing more, I would expect you to be fine whether you choose the MBA or MBP. Your mention of several apps open at once certainly suggests getting 16 GB memory no matter which model you choose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: opalstar91
Without knowing more, I would expect you to be fine whether you choose the MBA or MBP. Your mention of several apps open at once certainly suggests getting 16 GB memory no matter which model you choose.

Happy to supply more information if that helps form an opinion. Just super torn between both models. I would definitely get 16gb memory to upgrade the 8 I currently have. Would also get at least 512gb storage.
 
Happy to supply more information if that helps form an opinion. Just super torn between both models. I would definitely get 16gb memory to upgrade the 8 I currently have. Would also get at least 512gb storage.
Perhaps overlooked in all of these spec-focused threads is the question of which model feels more comfortable to you. When your local Apple store reopens, maybe think about going there and playing with each back-to-back. Sustained intense processing (particularly video) would suggest going with a MacBook Pro but how many people have that kind of use case? If that's not your case, you might easily figure out which is better for you based on the in-person demo.
 
Well, to be fair, CPU/Memory manufacturers don't adjust their warranty coverage based on how many cycles the CPU has run or how many gigabytes have been written to the RAM, but SSD manufacturers certainly do. It's considered a "wear item".

Yes, fair enough.

Also I hope for the prices Apple is charging, that they're at least using TLC, or even better MLC flash. I hope they're not using QLC....

Both SanDisk and Toshiba (Kioxia) make it annoyingly hard to find the parts Apple use, so not sure.
[automerge]1588700596[/automerge]
MicroSD is used in the Dell XPS 13 9300 (2020 model) since the reader for the SD card is just too small.

Right. I get why Dell wouldn't fit a full SD slot in there. I just don't really get the point of putting the slot there at all.

For full-size SD, at least you can argue that it's faster for extremely-high-end cards.

(During the brief period when MBPs had an SD card slot, there was also the funny hack of adding an SD card as additional semi-persistent storage that would be flush with the case. Really don't think that was a very common thing to do either, though.)

It helps for some digital camera's and drones footage/recordings or Android phone storage. However it's still slower than using USB-C /TB3 cable/connections directly to the camera, not to mention doing so it faster & will charge your camera while connected. You also don't run the silly risk of screwing up permissions on the card where the camera may not be able to recognize/use it right away before reformatting it therein.

I wonder what the numbers are on how many people actually ever use that microSD slot in their Android phone. I've seen it, but that was in a fairly nerdy circle.
[automerge]1588700812[/automerge]
Never heard of anyone swapping the CPU on a laptop or any CPU failing.

I rarely hear of SSDs failing any more.

But I know plenty of people that swapped the RAM and SSD and extended their device's life (I have even replaced a MBA logic board)

I used to swap the RAM on my older MacBooks; the 2002 iBook shipped with 128 MB and was upgraded to 384 and eventually 640 MB. The 2006 MacBook Pro shipped with 1 GB and was upgraded to 2. The 2010 shipped with 4(?) and was upgraded to 8.

I do miss that on my 2014. It came with 16 and will always have 16.

But I don't miss it enough that I would want the bulkier, heavier, more wear-prone old internals back.

And yes, some people have replaced bad WiFi modules too, although way less common.

Yeah, I think my iBook would've been able to accept an AirPort card.

IMHO, using soldered SSD is a conscious decision to charge more money upfront or to force an earlier upgrade.
That's fine. It's a valid business model.

I really think it's "make the device thinner, lighter, simpler, less wear-prone" first, "oh, and we make some extra cash on the BTO upgrades" second.
[automerge]1588701072[/automerge]
Would love some advice on which MP to purchase. Debating between both newest models of the MBA and MBP. Currently have a MBP from 2012 so these two new models are intriguing to say the least. I'm a teacher that uses quite a few apps at once. I'm pretty techy and understand most things, but processor talk makes my brain hurt LOL. Would need more storage and RAM thats for sure. But not sure if one version is better than the other, and would love some suggestions from you all, that from your comments seem to know than I do. Thanks in advance!

Right now, the MBA is an excellent buy, especially at its middle CPU option. At $100, it's a no-brainer. Then, the only questions are how much SSD and RAM you need. You probably want no less than 512 GB, though you can always go with external storage if you want to save money (Apple is not cheap on storage prices). You also probably want 16 GB RAM at this point. 8 GB is OK, but, y'know, for a fresh purchase, you probably shouldn't go with merely "OK".

The low-end MBP (8th-gen CPU) is not a good buy right now, I think.

The $1799-and-up MBP (8th-gen CPU) is, though! If that's within your budget, its CPU simply has nicer thermal headroom, so if you exhaust the machine a lot, it will sustain its speeds better.

If you want to spend $1500 or less, get an Air and configure the hell out of it. Do go with the $100 mid-range CPU option. If you're OK with spending $1799 or more, take a look at the 13-inch Pro with 10th-gen CPU.
 
Last edited:
And yet another lame upgrade by Apple!
More than lame is beyond pathetic

How can they dare to call this a “Pro” machine is beyond understanding?
How can they call it "Pro" with only 2 USB ports. Really?
It would actually be only one port if you think one is being used for A/C

- Same old 8th Gen processor, 4 core CPU.
- In order to get 4 ports you need to pay $1800! The only "Pro" thing is the price"
- 256 SSD for a Pro machine still a joke, even for an entry level.
- Same old thick bezel
- 720 Camera still?

Basically, the new keyboard and double the storage for the same prices.
Tim Crook is trying to charge you again just to buy the same computer and to fixed a failed keyboard!

Apple computer spec upgrades (especially the MBP) have sadly become a joke.
 
who on earth is touching the screen to rest their palms in the first place on a laptop?

Screen size does not affect palm space on the palm resets ... the screen is already larger than the keyboard so I'm not sure what you're referring to.

no kidding. In that case, even the current lineup has too slim bezels and should be looking into purchasing the older pre-2012 designs for larger bezels and maximum palm resting space lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
There aren't really any proper 10th gen 45W CPUs suitable for the 16 inch. The newer 45W intel CPUs are basically identical to 9th gen but with a higher thermal limit to get a marginally faster turbo boost

In the 16 inch MBPro, I am doubtful this will have any real-world performance advantage at all. Perhaps not even measurable in benchmarks unless the workload is very specific and very short-lived.

You are a bit wrong, there’s more than just the increase of a power limit, under the hood changes occur too. Furthermore, it is suggested that Tigerlake H-Series (8 cores) will be released this year which should be in time for the MacBook Pro 16 inch.
 
Right. I get why Dell wouldn't fit a full SD slot in there. I just don't really get the point of putting the slot there at all.

I wonder what the numbers are on how many people actually ever use that microSD slot in their Android phone.

I think it’s great - I use a micro sd plus adaptor combo for my rMBP (late 2013) to fit excess media on. It’s right there when I need it - just pop it in. Keeps the 256gb ssd drive nice and clean, free from over clutter etc. It’s a fantastic option and cheap way to expand storage when you don’t need the storage actively. I can also swap it into my iMac or business PC with ease. I find it extremely handy personally.

with respect to Android, I can’t comment on how people generally use it. But I can anecdotally share - I had a Galaxy s7, s9 and briefly s10. I found it useful for storing media files or transferring videos. The s7 had 32gb of storage and I had a cheap 32gb card that filled up with high def videos
My sister is an s10 user, she runs a business with a large team and they share a lot of videos. Her phone has a 128gb microsd on top of her 128gb storage. Way, way more storage than I’d ever use on my iPhone but for her it’s a nice amount. She’s not the type to buy a phone every 1-2 years like I am. She keeps them for a long time, and when she runs out of additional space she will just get a bigger card.

I think a lot of causal users myself included simply use them as cheap storage options. Obviously not a replacement for a native ssd but for offloading files that you want easy access to they are awesome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spectrum
Who on calls a Keyboard "Magic" when all it does is fix an awful design that they denied having problems with on the first place?

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard

The Magic Keyboard is similar to its predecessor but it has a lower profile. Apple reengineered the scissor mechanism to increase key stability by 33 percent and reduce key travel.
(...)
Apple also refers to the keyboard in the 2019 16-inch MacBook Pro and 2020 MacBook Air and Pro as the Magic Keyboard, which uses an identical scissor-mechanism with slightly shallower keys.[3]
 
You are a bit wrong, there’s more than just the increase of a power limit, under the hood changes occur too. Furthermore, it is suggested that Tigerlake H-Series (8 cores) will be released this year which should be in time for the MacBook Pro 16 inch.
What under-the-hood changes are present in the 10 th gen 45 Watt CPUs compared to 9th gen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan
I think it’s great - I use a micro sd plus adaptor combo for my rMBP (late 2013) to fit excess media on. It’s right there when I need it - just pop it in. Keeps the 256gb ssd drive nice and clean, free from over clutter etc. It’s a fantastic option and cheap way to expand storage when you don’t need the storage actively. I can also swap it into my iMac or business PC with ease. I find it extremely handy personally.

Fair enough.
 
Would love some advice on which MP to purchase. Debating between both newest models of the MBA and MBP. Currently have a MBP from 2012 so these two new models are intriguing to say the least. I'm a teacher that uses quite a few apps at once. I'm pretty techy and understand most things, but processor talk makes my brain hurt LOL. Would need more storage and RAM thats for sure. But not sure if one version is better than the other, and would love some suggestions from you all, that from your comments seem to know than I do. Thanks in advance!

The $1799 MacBook Pro (with 4 Thunderbolt ports) is “better” than any model MacBook Air except that it is more expensive ($150 more than the top-of-the-line Air), is 0.3 lbs heavier, lacks the wedge design (which some find more ergonomic), and has a slightly shorter battery life. It also has the Touch Bar, which some people like and others don’t. It has a better screen (wider color gamut), indisputably faster processor, and faster SSD.

For the Air, the i5 seems to be the sweet spot, and would be $1499 with 16GB/512GB.

Processors are confusing, but the bottom line is that if you do anything that requires extensive processing over an extended period of time, such as video encoding, the Pro will be better. If not, then the Air will be just fine and is cheaper.

Of course, as a teacher, you do get the education discount, so the i5 Air would be $1379 with 16/512 and the higher-end Pro would be $1699.
 
Whew! I was worried that buying my 16" last month may have been a mistake as the "new" 13-inch rumors really started picking up, and they were sounding really good... Things like super thin bezels and a 14" screen, 64gb RAM, six- and eight-core processors, etc. But nope lol

I would love the power of my 16" in a 13 or 14" form factor, but at the same time I hope they don't come out with that anytime soon because I'll want it too much haha

Didn’t see a single rumour for 64GB RAM, the CPUs in this series don’t even support it. The upgrade was always going to be to 32GB, especially since Apple are here to upsell you
 
Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Keyboard

The Magic Keyboard is similar to its predecessor but it has a lower profile. Apple reengineered the scissor mechanism to increase key stability by 33 percent and reduce key travel.
(...)
Apple also refers to the keyboard in the 2019 16-inch MacBook Pro and 2020 MacBook Air and Pro as the Magic Keyboard, which uses an identical scissor-mechanism with slightly shallower keys.[3]
Reduced key travel... Another non-improvement.
Key stability? When has key stability been a concern for anybody (other than with the faulty butterfly design)?
It's all about slimmer, slimmer, slimmer, lighter, lighter, lighter.
If they want to make it thinner and lighter at least innovate a little and make a touchscreen Mac with a slim sealed keyboard-cover like the iPad Pro.
This is honestly the worst of both worlds.
After ~2013-14 it's only been regressions...
Don't get me wrong, the MBA is a beautiful entry-level machine.
But the pro is... not so Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan and d0nK
How will this model (the higher-tier 10th-gen configs) fare with a 4K external display connected? Lots of lag expected, or should these new and improved iGPUs handle that smoothly?
 
How will this model (the higher-tier 10th-gen configs) fare with a 4K external display connected? Lots of lag expected, or should these new and improved iGPUs handle that smoothly?
hopefully it'll be a bit better than my 2020 i7 MBA. It'll have the same GPU, but have more power to play with. In regular UI and regular websites it's ok in chrome and in safari, but news+ is laggy as heck. Plugging in an eGPU with RX580 takes away the lag so it's not the CPU that's holding it back...

My MBP 16 is laggy also with iGPU but if I force the AMD GPU on it's smooth in News+ also...
 
There is so much I'm willing to compromise to stay with Mac OS. I think is time to go back to Windows or even Linux.
-

While I think this is a fine laptop, I'll be happy to see what an AMD Ryzen 4800U Linux laptop can do... Hopefully soon.
 
Kind of weird how the 1068NG7 seems to be basically identical to the non-N. Maybe it has fewer GPU EUs? Or is the "N" really just a "not for third parties" marker? (For the Air, that's not true — some of the NG parts have a higher TDP, and a higher clock.)

There is nothing that I have seen to suggest that Apple is using a special variant of the 1068G7. As you say, the specs are an identical match. 28 Watt TPD CPU with base 2.3 and boost 4.1.

However, it is clear that they must be using an as yet unreleased i5 variant for the 2.0Ghz model. 1038G7 or 1038NG7 makes sense here. It can't just be a i5-1035G7 with TDP increased to 25W, because that CPU would still be limited to max 3.7Ghz turbo:


It could mean that Apple requested some minor modification. For example, Apple doesn’t use the V-Pro technology for device security, so it’s conceivable Intel customized it.

Yes the "NG" version of ICL-Y SKUs in Macbook Air is the "TDP-up" version and the 1038NG7 in the $1799 MBP 13" is a totally new SKU (which I believe Intel calls "single customer" SKUs).

Check out this link: https://www.anandtech.com/show/1565...lake-mobile-cpus-are-these-in-the-macbook-air

Anandtech Quote below:

Another aspect is the smaller package size. Intel for the Ice CPUs traditionally has two packages - a Type 3 at 50x25mm, and a Type 4 at 26.5 x 18.5 mm. With Type 4, the CPU and IO chips are close together and have a shim to stiffen the package. This new package seems to be off-roadmap as well, without the shim - a 'Type 5' package if you will. The smaller package also helps in designing the system, leaving more room for other components. Arguably this is the biggest change with these CPUs, reducing the package from 26.5 mm by 18.5 mm to 22.0 mm by 16.5 mm, a 26% size reduction.

So looks like the differences in those MBA "NG" SKUs are Base Freq and listed TDP (which correlates with each other) but more importantly, it is using an off menu "T5" packaging which is even smaller than Type 4 packaging.

It's very possible that the 1068NG7 in the BTO model is identical to the standard 1068G7 with this smaller T5 packaging for Apple.

This is not unprecedented as the base spec 2020 MBA with 1000NG4 is identical spec wise to 1000G4 except with the smaller T5 packaging.
 
I was ready to buy a 14” MBP to upgrade from my 2014 13” MBP. My MBP is working fine but I’d love an upgrade just for the sake of it. I’ll wait another year and just save my money, thanks Apple!
 
So many things wrong in this statement, you better update yourself.

It’s really not though, I watched a video today comparing the 4900HS versus the 10875H, Intel was superior in every test but one. These were proper tests, not benchmarks.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Malus120
It's an upgrade but to me the "Pro" should at least have dedicated graphics. I remember when Apple decided to cut that out of the smaller MacBooks and I didn't like it then and don't like it now. If I was going to buy a 13" it would be the Air. If I wanted something with more power the 16" is the only option

I really had to try calling your bluff on the older machines ... and you're correct.
PowerBook G4 12" (867mhz) with NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go (4X AGP) graphics with 32 MB of DDR SDRAM Jan.2003

PowerBook G4 12" (1.5Ghz) with NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 (4X AGP) graphics with 64 MB of DDR SDRAM Jan 2005
 
  • Haha
Reactions: russell_314
I was ready to buy a 14” MBP to upgrade from my 2014 13” MBP. My MBP is working fine but I’d love an upgrade just for the sake of it. I’ll wait another year and just save my money, thanks Apple!

Well it may only be a matter of months before we get the 14". We'll see. Apple is updating at near unprecedented frequency lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lionel Messi
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.