Originally posted by Ensoniq
G3 + AltiVec. Based on that definition, IBM's upcoming (announced, not myth) PPC 750 VX
Who announced it? I can't find any links with google, nor on the IBM website. Show me, I want it to be true!
Originally posted by Ensoniq
G3 + AltiVec. Based on that definition, IBM's upcoming (announced, not myth) PPC 750 VX
Originally posted by mvc
Yep, I was watching a 45yr old reading a map at arms length the other day - he couldn't get it far enough away to focus on it - said it all changed for him about 2 months before.
Oh Joy.![]()
Originally posted by reflex
I believe the Pentium-M is based more or less on the PIII (shoot me if I'm wrong). There are many applications optimized for the PIII.
I don't have any real reason to doubt you, but that statement is based on what?Originally posted by Plutoniq
The PowerPC 750GX is really an outstanding processor
Chill, man. I think it was humour (notice the smilie). No need to get on your high horses...Originally posted by Abercrombieboy
Hey don't slam my Macs! They are all I have and what I can afford for now. You can make fun of Macky and Booker, but they have been stable dependable machines from the day I bought each of them new. I would love to have a new computer, but I just don't have the money right now. I am glad they are dependable enough that I don't need a new computer right now. Slam PC's if you wanna slam someone's computers not my Macs.
I was just saying if I had the money to bet. It was just a figure of speech. I am a public school teacher so I will probably never see a million, unless I someday get money smart and get out of the business of educating kids.
Very good spot!! Notice that in that NC line there doesn't seem to be any higher frequency available. Because of the size (12") Apple was restricted in terms of power consumption. I guess that on the 14", air flow is much better and therefore they can afford a more power hungry processor. Maybe.Originally posted by mariner77
For those of you who are curious how the G4 will affect the power usage in the new iBook, I'll provide some useful analysis (800 MHz only).
First, there are two versions of MPC7455 that Motorola produces (ignoring the MPC7445 for now), they are designated by XPC7455RX800LC and XPC7455RX800NC. The LC version, with a core voltage of 1.6V is the one that's published on Motorola's website, it has a power rating of 17W (typical) and 24W (Max), which is terrible for notebook application. The NC version, on the other hand, has a core voltage of 1.3V and its power rating is 11.2W (Typical) and 15.9W (Max) which is reasonable. I believe this is the version that Apple's using in their 12'' iBook G4.
You can see for yourself at http://e-www.motorola.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/MPC7455RXNXPNS.pdf
Check that most excellent post from bankshot on why it might not be possible:Originally posted by edenwaith
I would love to see a budget-level e/iBook for the money-strapped consumer (hey, it's still better than $2000 for a laptop several years ago),
Originally posted by theRebel
Someone else will have to shoot you; I do not have a gun.
Originally posted by jefhatfield
oh, and speaking about guns, i just tried the latest penis enlarging pill from the internet!!
Originally posted by mvc
Off topic, or just an OFF topic?
Originally posted by theRebel
Anyway, most modern apps are optimized more for the Pentium 4 these days and not so much for the Pentium III.
Should we organize a spyhunt on macrumors.com? And how?Originally posted by Phil Of Mac
Steve Jobs did note at WWDC (I think it was) that they do read the rumor sites![]()
Hmm. So by that logic, if you're doing basic word processing, you should prefer a 300dpi plotter to a 1200dpi standard size high-quality printer? Same thing...Originally posted by Plutoniq
How is watching DVD's, playing games, doing Photoshop work, surfing the Net....... better on a 12" LCD over a 14"? The point about resolution is irrelevant....... Bigger screens are better.
Have you heard about HDTV? Have you ever tried watching standard NTSC on a bigscreen without a line doubler, or watching a DVD without progressive scan on a large screen TV? Its truly painful.By your logic, people should own the smallest TV screen, I mean....hey it's all NTSC resolution..... only 570 (or whatever) lines of resolution....... so what's the point of owning a 50"+ TV over a 10"?
So, when looking for desktop screens, did you always go for the .35 dot pitch ones? Its the same issue. Besides, the more controls you want to put on the screen at once, the higher resolution you want them to be. Think about it - if you have a fixed number of controls and display space, and a fixed amount of screen real estate (in area), wouldn't you rather have crisp controls than blocky ones? Especially with apps like Photoshop, where you have full control over the (physical) size of your work, a higher dpi will give you a crisper picture.Anybody who is using a laptop for Live audio, VJing, etc., screen size is important. Open up a complex Reaktor Ensemble with 100+ controls/buttons on screen, visually editing sound files in Bias Peak, looking at 24-tracks in Protools or Ableton Live with plugins....... doing this sought of stuff on a 12" is unbearable, and I'm in my 20's.
Originally posted by rjstanford
Think about it - if you have a fixed number of controls and display space, and a fixed amount of screen real estate (in area), wouldn't you rather have crisp controls than blocky ones?
In some apps, that's true - and if its not adjustable, you have a choice to make. In any app that uses one or more areas for "expandable, zoomable" real estate (including just about any document processing app, almost (but not) everything with a large client area that has a scrollbar though, you are often better going for the higher-dpi, crisper option for easier vision.Originally posted by reflex
That's exactly the point. When the screen resolution goes up, those controls get smaller, not crispier (in a lot if not most applications).
Originally posted by panphage
Who announced it? I can't find any links with google, nor on the IBM website. Show me, I want it to be true!
Originally posted by edesignuk
WOW, I can't quite believe it, it's great, but don't you think this will eat in to PowerBook sales?
I would be interested to read other people 's first impressions on the new iBook G4 too.Originally posted by Grokgod
Could some of the users that got the new iBook's post some comments about the heat issues and the fans, all the usual things?
Is it the 12"Pb in a iBook casing?
Does it have the 12" Pb heat issues?
If it is the 12" Pb in a iBook case maybe since its not a ALU body it wont heat up as much?
I want to get an iBook for my girlfriend.
she has been waiting for long while now patiently for the iBooks to go G4!
tia
I told you guys it would be nearly the same as the PB12.Originally posted by NicoMan
...edit: oh btw, it also says that there is only one RAM expansion slot, which can contain up to 512MB, for a grand total of 640MB...