I think we should be seeing a 160GB (or higher) iPod Touch (yes, it's not going to be as thin as the flash based versions), to replace the iPod Classic.
I think we should be seeing a 160GB (or higher) iPod Touch (yes, it's not going to be as thin as the flash based versions), to replace the iPod Classic.
Excuse my ignorance but what is the advantage of a curved screen....
I like the idea of a 160gb touch, but this is very unlikely due to the hard drive being too slow for the touch OS to run from. Flash memory is much faster.
I like the idea of a 160gb touch, but this is very unlikely due to the hard drive being too slow for the touch OS to run from. Flash memory is much faster.
Won't happen.
The Classic isn't going anywhere. The iPod Touch will never/can't replace it.
.
The Classic isn't going anywhere. The iPod Touch will never/can't replace it.
Bookmark feed://www.macrumors.com/macrumors.xml, which displays a number in your Bookmarks Bar that updates every time there's a new rumor.anyone else getting sick of checking for updates and seeing the nano picture on the front page everytime? to me, it's an ugly update if they do it. regardless, the picture quality of the image is terrible and it's just annoying me every time. can't someone make up a new rumor about the iphone or imac or macbook air and include a picture that looks decent to bump this current one down a notch?!![]()
I'd say it'd be at least $100 more expensive than an iPod touch of equivalent capacity."New" ipod? : This new ipod will feature at least a 4.3-4.5" screen, MAYBE 5.4". Run eirther iphone OS or even a striped down verson of mac OSX. It will be like the "newton". Think of it as an larger touch. Will feature a HD Or flash based:
HD based:
80GB: $399
160GB: $499
Flash based:
32GB: $299 (match other 32GB models above)
64GB: $399
iTunes 8
Major revamp. ipod/iphone like UI. Cover flow defalut on all views. Quicktime player will be bulit in (no more seprate apps) Free download
9 to 5 mac mentions capacity increases in their rumor.No mention of larger storage for the new Nano - any ideas?
It's interesting how Kevin Rose hasn't said anything about the Mac tablet device rumored for September/October.
you dont kno Kev or his situation, your just angry cause you dont belive him(and you have the right to) and your being mean.Why is Kevin Rose doing this ? Is he in such desperate need of attention or traffic ? I thought he was in a real business, with a company, a reputation and people who work for him.
you dont kno Kev or his situation, your just angry cause you dont belive him(and you have the right to) and your being mean.
geez why are ya'll hatin on kevin rose,i love the speculations and the rumours,thats why im a apple fan, thats why it's fun,even if it's wrong c-mon let play nice, dosent mean he's a bad guy.
i feel passionate about apple but sometimes you guys take things a little far, and say some really dispicable and hatefull things.
and to be honest, all of us only have our theories and opinions(and thats okay), and none of us can produce evidence that it's real or a hoax, thats why it's a RUMOR,we wont find out truly untill the ipod refresh. so lets be nice
Thanks for the background info. So basically he's an ass who betrays his friends trust while they are in a compromised state?
I think the 'new' nano looks awesesome. Should the iTunes thing hold true... can't wait for the updates. Skinnable interface anyone?
Never.
2154 A.D. and they will STILL have an iPod classic with a tiny no-touch screen and it will suck compared to everything else around it.
Most did not belive the fat nano, most said it was ugly and not something Apple would design. This look to me as a possible design. Either way we will know in a few weeks.
Kevin Rose knows a lot of people from Apple (translation: drinking buddies). That's where he gets his info, friends (probably drunk at the time) tell him stuff and he leaks it secondhand without revealing who said it. He's been doing this all the way back since he was on The Screen Savers.