I hope you realize that it's not Intel's fault that technology has run up against a physics wall. You don't actually think Intel engineers are sitting on their thumbs just partying and killing time. That would dumb to even consider. I'd wager they're experimenting and doing their best to come up with the next big step. It's just not as easy as some of you think.blame Intel not Apple. They seem to be having real issues getting product out the door in recent years. They are late again. Kaby Lake is still not generally available except in some very low power and clock rate versions. Can you go out today and buy a KabyLake i7 in Macbook packaging today?
We could be seeing the final straw in thr Apple/Intel CPU relationship. There are probably people in Apple Engineering that must be banging their heads on the walls in frustration with Intel.
This might be the tipping point and in two years time Intel MacBooks will be a thing of the past.
OTOH, the differences esp the performance differences between the two CPU's are fairly minimal.
I'd fully expect that the hardware will be able to take both CPU's with the minimum of engineering or process changes.
Lets hope that the Chipset can take 32Gb of RAM. For me that is the most crucial thing.
I need good discrete graphics. I'll keep a cheap/old/entry level mac to stay in the ecosystem for my photos etc. with my phones, iPads, Apple TV, but I'll be using a Windows laptop if I can't get halfway decent graphics on my next MacBook Pro.
I get the impression a lot of Mac users like buying new stuff for the sake of buying new stuff. You rarely see explanations why people desperately need that massive 12% boost in CPU performance when they already have a relatively modern Mac. I shouldn't moan. I want Apple to continue making as much money as possible so.....![]()
Every generation improvement is modest , between 10-15% hence I've had no reason to upgrade my 2012 rMBP.
I guess some people want that 10-15% when they buy premium.
Id be honestly suprised, gimmicks aside, If these machines actually give a substantial performance boast. It's really going to depend if apple is going for performance or really thin...the 2015 machines might still be the better machine for power users.
Usually on the day or within a week.Does anyone know if when Apple announces these things are they usually available right away?
Literally nothing. Apple doesn't respect its consumers. No Idea why so many of you are shocked.
Now THAT is funny. Yay for social justice warriors! Is social injustice even a thing? These people need to move on with their lives.Oh, you don't know what's different? I will tell you then. Their former CEO passed away and they hired a guy who has no clue about the meaning of the word innovation when it comes to computers. But he is a social justice hero and a visionary when it comes to watch bands.
12% boost is a lie. It's always way more than that for Mac Pros with every refresh... But the current Mac Pro has garbage for a GPU, worse yet there's no upgrade for the current GPUs either thanks to the bone headed decision to make it a proprietary PCIe slot. Sigh.
Yea I don't buy this either. An entire event to say here are new MBPs, slightly thinner but looks more or less the same, usbc, and a touch strip? Few demos of the strip with certain apps. Then a MacBook that's 1" bigger with an extra port. Would be very underwhelming after such a long wait.
Oh gosh no. I'm relying on a new iMac next week (current iMac's display is failing after a good 6 years!). Hi ho, hi ho, it's back to the PC side I go![]()
This sounds confusing. 9to5mac reports it referring to a 13" MacBook and nothing else.
I can't see Apple redesigning the chassis of the MacBook Air to accommodate the USB-C ports, then leaving the rest exactly as it has been for the last 6 years. It would not make sense to push the MacBook Air as the future of laptops with new I/O and still keeping a non-retina display. Especially not when everything in the OS is optimized for retina.
I see two options.
1. If it has a USB-C port, it will be a brand new 13" MacBook with Retina Display. 11" Air gone, 13" Air kept as the budget option.
2. If not, it will be a spec update for the good old MacBook Air. Skylake/Kaby Lake. No new ports, no new design, just internal updates. No USB-C.
What do you guys think? Good thing is we'll probably find out thursday!![]()
I don't want to waste my money if the better one is out in, well, god knows how many weeks or months later. I tend to buy the high-end, maxed out model and generally those see the biggest improvements plus I'm expecting an improved display. It's not just about the CPU. I get them to last as long as possible so yeah. Not planning on wasting money.Not that it matters to me what you buy but, out of interest, what's the problem with the current 27" 5k imac? They have the most recent chip (Skylake) available to them and are within a stones throw of the cost of a 5k monitor with no computer at all. If you were expecting a Kaby imac this month then it just was not physically possible.
Not to mention, there have always been cheaper (not prettier necessarily) options.Probably the fact that those $1000 displays make up something like .0000001% of their revenue (totally made up number btw, but you get my point). The only people who really care about this caliber of display are video/photo professionals who, unfortunately, have become an afterthought in Apple's business plans.
I don't want to waste my money if the better one is out in, well, god knows how many weeks or months later. I tend to buy the high-end, maxed out model and generally those see the biggest improvements plus I'm expecting an improved display. It's not just about the CPU. I get them to last as long as possible so yeah. Not planning on wasting money.
More like "leave Mac" status.If this is it, I suppose MacRumors can retain the "Don't buy" status after next week.![]()
That's pretty slick looking.Yeah! USB-C!!!
Now, that's what I call innovation!
Not like these other companies, which sell boring, boring stuff for half the price! Like this one:
![]()
http://bgr.com/2016/10/17/lenovo-yoga-book-review-release-date/