Was it that game where fairies flew around?
No, just a stupid little thing where you pointed at a card with a known pattern on a surface, a character appeared on there and you could mess with them a bit. Damned if I can remember the name of it.
Was it that game where fairies flew around?
When a console is introduced there are games on it the first day it goes on sale. The way you build an architecture around unreleased chips is the same - working closely with the manufacturer and working with prerelease chips or technology to allow you to release the computer (or game) the second the chip is released. So - this is not the reason as other manufacturers do this all the time. Apple is just being Apple.
Sorry but I checked Intel's actual sight and specs comparisons between the old and new CPUs and your link confirms what I wrote. Additionally another poster added to my quote the info on the faster video, as your link also says.
In a nut shell Kaby is not a significant tick in the Intel clock.
Basically you just want to complain and as others are also posting Kaby is just not timely for good engineering in such a short time frame.
Give it up Stella, it's not just a gaming machine.
BTW Stella did you check the date on your link? Aug 2016, just like Intel said, the official release date for Kaby and board developers only got the CPUs as early as April or May 2016. Not enough time for full scale development and release of quality products to the general public.
Now if you want a MB with Kaby it looks like early 2017 from MSI or ASUS is as early as you will get one.
Excellent timing, my Mid 2012 just quit charging today
Stella
I apologize then, I took you reference to google as a slam and a defense, like many have posted, that the coming MBP will miss out on gaming opportunities because of the lack of Kaby.
I get tired of all the slammers and those who are not happy with their Apple products. I find the Apple machines overall superior to the average Windows machine and even with the latest Win 10 version, far more user consistent and friendly.
Thank you for you correction.
I cannot believe that Apple would kill the Mac Pro now after putting in so much effort in designing the nMP. Far more likely that they might repurpose it to be cheaper, ie the headless mac. Create a few more variations with differing motherboard platforms, add a reasonably priced consumer version, and they might get some serious sales.I'm getting a sick feeling about the Mac Pro.
I hope you don't think he really meant what he said about that IPad. That's marketing speak, IPad sales were flat, they needed to say something to convince people to try it this new one, and they even called it a "Pro" to help pitch it. There is no way the IPad replaces a Macbook, anyone with even half a brain knows that.
[doublepost=1477272017][/doublepost]
No, there is no way that is happening now, or anytime in the foreseeable future.
Have you considered that maybe Ming-Chi Kuo's predictions are always correct? Perhaps it's actually Tim Cook and Apple who are sometimes wrong!Ming Chi is secretly Tim Cook's boss, so he is 99.9% of the time right on!
How about the Skylake i7 6770/6870/6970-HQ with Iris Pro 580 which were "launched" in January but we've only seen the 6770 in anything shipping at all, and that's Intel's Skull Canyon NUC which started shipping early Summer I believe. None of those are shipping any laptop on the market, and we haven't seen the 68/6970s in anything at all yet.
Those whining for Kaby Lake really don't understand how these releases actually unfold in real life. All we have for KL yet are the super low power chips that would never be seen in a MBP. Who knows when those will actually ship.
Apple made the switch from PPC in early 2006.10 years ago Intels CPU release cycles were totally different, and we were on PPC, so that's comparing apples to oranges.
That quad-core Skylake you mentioned is the exact family of processors I expect to see in the next-gen 15" MBP & updated 21.5" 4K iMac
Perhaps. Haven't they also had some major departures and some internal re-org? Perhaps the car project and icloud have sucked up a lot of resources too.The CEO.
Yes, but I'm talking MBr exclusively here, that external TB controller doesn't fit, which is why the MBr doesn't have TB at the moment. Realize that it has no bearing on either current gen. MBPr.That's not really that significant when the TB3 controller is available the way Apple have been implementing Thunderbolt 2 and the way it'll be implemented on the MacBook Pro's next week. In the long term having an integrated chip will cut down costs for manufacturers but it won't make any difference to us the end user.
There is a TB3 two bus chip exactly the same as the TB2 one used by Apple on the 15" rMBP now, and that's what will be going into the new machines next week.
A Skylake processor...? Seriously Apple?
I could understand an iMac with skylake. But MacBooks? Give me a break Apple, you really should use the newer Kaby Lake processors that offer some real power efficiency advantages...unless you want to be out of date literally on the first day.
I don't consider Pokemon Go and similar as AR as it's pretty much just a graphical overlay. When I mention AR, I mean things like HoloLens and for VR, OculusI had an AR app on my iPhone 3G. It isn't inherently graphically intensive, it depends entirely on what you choose to augment the view with.
what is better - OSX VS windows is user preference and what you are doing. Windows is better for some tasks and OSX better for others.. Not black and white.
I don't consider Pokemon Go and similar as AR as it's pretty much just a graphical overlay. When I mention AR, I mean things like HoloLens and for VR, Oculus
What is it about this that people are not understanding? The fastest Kaby chip that can possibly have is the 15w one. If Apple put a 15w Kabylake in the 13" rMBP it will be slower in general computation than the Haswell part they have now. There is no argument here and nothing you Google or nothing anyone else builds with ULV Kaby will change that. The appropriate chips will not be released until next year
I know right? Why do people get so damn obsessed with the product names?
As others have mentioned, there's still a major plot hole here around the release date. If these chips were released in June, even if they weren't available in volume right away, why not announce them the last week of July and start shipping them the first week of August? Even if they took six weeks to ship them all, that would have been way less bad than Apple missing back-to-school season.
Unless Skylake just because available in volume, it's hard to believe that there wasn't some other component they were waiting for.