Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But this is a Note 8, so that's not pertinent anymore.

Seriously, you all aren't fooling anyone. If Apple released the Note 8 hardware and slapped iOS on it, you would all be going apes**t over it.
[doublepost=1509986265][/doublepost]

Qualcomm.

(drops mic)
But Qualcomm actually has reason to take Apple to court... @kdarling if you don't mind taking a minute out of your day to explain better than I ever could?
 
Compromises? The Note 8 won’t get Oreo until 2018. It’ll take 6 months after release to get Android P, which will be its final update. Android is a huge compromise in updates/security, pretty much the most important part in any OS.

PS: Notice Apples record quarter? And guidance for monster record setting numbers next quarter? You think lines matter?

Quarterly earnings matter as a benchmark for popularity, not good UX/product design.

And, what's the most disappointing about it, is that good experience design (that made Apple famous in the first place) apparently does NOT matter to a lot people, so Cook & co can carry on having a field day releasing one patchy beta product after another :(

PS. The ad gave me a good chuckle, but it won't turn me towards Samsung. It simply underlined how fed up I've felt with iPhones for years. I've had high hopes for this year's releases (LG G6, S8, Pixel 2, yes the iPhone X too) but it's just not possible to buy a handset that doesn't present the user with a tradeoff of some sort. So, I'm still using my 6S and the 7 provided by the office. And probably the 6S is the last iDevice I'll buy on my own volition.
 
Last edited:
You can try, but since Samsung turned coward back in 2014 and stopped reporting it’s going to be tough. Apple, however, still provides their sales even when it shows a decline (like the iPad).

I don't think thats true. Samsung is a publicly traded company on eh Korean exchange and in London. They can't just not report sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovemykid3302012
But we're not all as cool as you. So we as a group tend to like the same things. That doesn't mean its wrong just because you don't like it. lol.
Cool as me? Huh? Been drinking the Applejuice too early this morning? I am not saying anyone is wrong for liking Apple, as it works for its userbase, as Android works for its userbase. Same with Microsoft, Linux, and so forth. All I was getting at is, options are great to have. Just cause someone has brand loyalty, doesn't mean they offer the best choice for them. Many people on this forum have blinders on, and repeat arguments from many, many, years ago, to try and justify their reasoning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovemykid3302012
I won both the X (and LTE smartwatch) and the Note 8 and Frontier S3 watch.

Every year, I have the latest iOS device and the latest Android device (Note series last several years). My main phone and one as a "secondary" device. Every year since 2008-ish, iPhone has been the main device.

This is the first year I am struggling to decide which to use as primary. Android on the Note 8 is as smooth as iOS is, probably for the first time, and its quite stable. iOS apps tend to be better overall, but the Frontier S3 watch, quite frankly, blows away the Apple watch away in functionality and apps. That round interface and dial beats the little scroll wheel.

I also like the Note 8 has a total of 464GB of storage, thanks to Sandisk's new 400GB microSD card. I was disappointed the X didn't match the iPad Pro in 512GB storage. In any case, its really a tough choice this year.

To each their own, but anyone who says both devices aren't great devices, in different ways, is just kidding themselves - or trying to justify NOT choosing one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: convergent
Yeah along with all the other several hundred people Apple randomly contacted here. If you actually believe this, you are a closed minded fool.

What about all the things that people don't agree with you on other topics? Is your first thought that "they must be getting paid off by xyz company"? Please tell me you are just trolling and you are not this stupid.

People have different opinions about everything, and the sooner you are able to realize this, the better off you'll be. Or maybe the easier thing is to say "whatever, I'm always right, they must be getting paid off, yeah that's totally logical!"

PLEASE tell me you're just trolling here.

It’s obvious I hit a vein and you haven’t had your coffee yet. If there was no truth to what I am saying when why “doth protest too much?”
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovemykid3302012
To be fair Apple touted hardware this year. There’s really nothing different about software. I realize there are “73849383” new features in iOS 11, but off the top of my head I couldn’t even tell you what changed without looking it up.
That's fair, the point that I was getting to is Samsung's overall stance of comparing hardware without comparing software which is one of the biggest factors in decision to switch platforms, they don't seem to appreciate the friction associated with switching OS platform and the associated ecosystem. Samsung seems to think that throwing hardware and kitchen sink at software UI and performance issues will provide a good user experience, which so far doesn't seemed to have worked.

And they have little control on hardware and software synergy and all the efficiency that it affords, leaving them to primary focus on hardware in their advertising and business model.
 
Pretty good ad I thought, really shows a lot of areas where Apple were a step behind. Things like water proofing, MicroSD expandable storage, larger display sizes etc - These are not areas where Apple came in later and did it better, they just came in late.

EDIT:// A lot of you guys are replying to this message saying I'm misinformed, hypnotised by Samsung marketing or some other thing like that. If you're going to reply like that, don't bother, its already been done.

I'm an iPhone user, you can see that by my signature. But I'm no Apple fanboy. Samsung, HTC and Google have been first to have many features that Apple is late on.

Things they were late to adding: Larger Screens, Water Proofing, Dual Front Facing Speakers, OLED, Edge to Edge displays, Wireless Charging, NFC Payments, Open NFC Framework for Developers to use, dual back cameras with different focal lengths, fast charging over USB (Apple still doesn't include a fast charger in the box like Android phone makers do).

Things we're still waiting for them to catch up on: Dual-output Bluetooth, Multiple Apps on screen at once with a divider (on iPhone not iPad), FLAC support in the music app, Expandable MicroSD Storage support for Media files, Side-loading applications for individuals and not just businesses, support for the Apple Pencil, auto-connecting to Bluetooth speakers via NFC tapping, USB-C on the phone instead of Lightning.

And there is a lot more stuff I'm sure, these are just some of the things I can remember. I've been an iPhone user since 2009 with the iPhone 3GS, I've never owned an Android device but I'm no sheep, we often have to wait years before we get the features Android has had and not all of them are implemented better on the iPhone, only some of them are.
I will agree that Apple needs to transition from Lightning to USB-C. Not their fault that they developed Lightning; but it's time to change.

However, you are dead-wrong about the "Sideloading" thing. Individuals have been able to Sideload Apps on iOS since iOS 8. It's just not very well known.

You can either do it with XCode, if someone publishes the Source (which many have), or you can use the Freeware "Cydia Impactor" to install and Run ".ipa" Files. And with Impactor, you don't even need a Mac.

And all this is completely legit. No Jailbreaking, no special Licensing. Nothing.

http://www.cydiaimpactor.com/

Oh, and I'm pretty sure Apple tried the multiple apps on a phone thing, and laughed it out of the room.

As for FLAC support, you really DO need to keep up...

http://www.idownloadblog.com/2017/09/14/iphone-x-hardware-flac-codec/

And as far as OLEDs go, there were three major barriers to adoption:

1. Samsung owns a BUNCH of Patents on OLED and AMOLED, and pretty much leads the industry in good color OLED panels.

2. (Related to #1) Samsung wasn't really interested in selling their precious OLED panels (which have yield problems to begin with) to their largest competitor, at anything like a reasonable price.

3. OLEDs have only very recently become reliable enough to be a serious replacement for a phone/iPod that is expected to last several years.
 
That's fair, the point that I was getting to is Samsung's overall stance of comparing hardware without comparing software which is one of the biggest factors in decision to switch platforms, they don't seem to appreciate the friction associated with switching OS platform and the associated ecosystem. Samsung seems to think that throwing hardware and kitchen sink at software UI and performance issues will provide a good user experience, which so far doesn't seemed to have worked.

And they have little control on hardware and software synergy and all the efficiency that it affords, leaving them to primary focus on hardware in their advertising and business model.
The way I see it you tout what’s great and not what isn’t. Apple used to talk about fragmentation when their numbers were good. They’re still good but not as amazingly good. I’ve noticed this is no longer a talking point with them.

It’s also hard to objectively state, particularly in a 30-60 second ad, that your software is better/different. I guess we can argue taking notes with the S pen is showcasing the marriage of software versus hardware, for better or for worse.

St the end of the day I honestly don’t believe the software argument holds much water anyway. Things are about on par there these days. Everyone shouting from the rooftops that Android is garbage or iOS is limited are just super fans. My opinions of course.
 
I'm pretty sure Apple is touting plenty of specs... like the "bionic" CPU that we now see from speed tests isn't translating to much of an advantage in real life usage.

I still go back to what I said before. Where is everyone's sense of humor. Are you so personally attached to your smartphone that you can't enjoy watching an ad like this and appreciate it for what it is? Both Apple and Samsung make great products and its good for all of us that they do. You want to live in a world of one company monopoly? I surely don't.
"Bionic" is branding. Again, it's a new chip. Developers haven't taken advantage of it. Are you disputing its raw power based on benchmarks? Save that "benchmarks are useless" comback as it's just a tool to prove the potential is there. iOS 11 has its issues and is yet to be optimized for the new phones. You really think Apple "forgot" how to make chips and optimize an OS from the iPhone 7 which has been faster in speed tests than iPhone 8? They will get it right and it's not slouch right now. iOS 11.1 already improved things quite a bit.

Android is more of a monopoly OS than Apple...they have over 85% market share.

I laughed at the ad. I think Samsung is desperate to change the minds of people who don't care about the message they are trying to portray. The only relevant dig was the notch because the rest of the stuff is already in the current iPhone. I honestly think these ads are good for Apple. The more talk, the better.

I do actually like Samsung phones...I hate Android. It's fragmented and not updated. I owned Android since 2008 and just switched to iPhone X because of sick of 0 support, buggy OS, slow phones, and terrible battery life.
 
They are portraying the stylus as if that's a plus. I do believe that a stylus can have practical applications on a tablet for such activities as illustrating, but why would you want it for writing notes on a phone? It's much easier and faster two type phone numbers and messages on the keyboard.
 
Pretty good ad I thought, really shows a lot of areas where Apple were a step behind. Things like water proofing, MicroSD expandable storage, larger display sizes etc - These are not areas where Apple came in later and did it better, they just came in late.

EDIT:// A lot of you guys are replying to this message saying I'm misinformed, hypnotised by Samsung marketing or some other thing like that. If you're going to reply like that, don't bother, its already been done.

I'm an iPhone user, you can see that by my signature. But I'm no Apple fanboy. Samsung, HTC and Google have been first to have many features that Apple is late on.

Things they were late to adding: Larger Screens, Water Proofing, Dual Front Facing Speakers, OLED, Edge to Edge displays, Wireless Charging, NFC Payments, Open NFC Framework for Developers to use, dual back cameras with different focal lengths, fast charging over USB (Apple still doesn't include a fast charger in the box like Android phone makers do).

Things we're still waiting for them to catch up on: Dual-output Bluetooth, Multiple Apps on screen at once with a divider (on iPhone not iPad), FLAC support in the music app, Expandable MicroSD Storage support for Media files, Side-loading applications for individuals and not just businesses, support for the Apple Pencil, auto-connecting to Bluetooth speakers via NFC tapping, USB-C on the phone instead of Lightning.

And there is a lot more stuff I'm sure, these are just some of the things I can remember. I've been an iPhone user since 2009 with the iPhone 3GS, I've never owned an Android device but I'm no sheep, we often have to wait years before we get the features Android has had and not all of them are implemented better on the iPhone, only some of them are.

When Android is relatively comparable to the user experience that iOS has and the speed to complete tasks; that's when I will REALLY consider jumping ship.

Microsoft, Google, Samsung have amazing hardware that sometimes is so much better and cheaper than Apple's. Unfortunately their OS's are crap.
 
In what ways is it innovative? The tech is awesome sure, but what can it really do that other phones can't?
Actual features, actual capabilities, real things I can do with it. Can you list any that say the iPhone 8 can't do? Or a cheap OnePlus can't do?
Better privacy and security?
 
That’s the rub. Sure they don’t sell as much as Apple but companies would kill for the profit Samsung has and yet they can’t seem to get out of Apple’s shadow.
Pretty sure Samsung has much bigger market share than Apple worldwide in smartphones? Unless you mean in the US only.
 
It's samsung being samsung again. They also don't mention their phone looks like crap and runs android

The Samsung Note 8 looks very similar to the iPhone X (in case you haven't actually seen both), and Android? You mean the phone OS used by over 80% of smartphone users? I'm thinking you are suddenly in the minority in your thinking.
 
The Samsung Note 8 looks very similar to the iPhone X (in case you haven't actually seen both), and Android? You mean the phone OS used by over 80% of smartphone users? I'm thinking you are suddenly in the minority in your thinking.

Yeah but it's my opinion I used android for years (Galaxy S3, LG 2X HD, Experia S) and nothing can make me go use android again. The thought of it... brrr...
 
But the ad DOESN'T slam anybody. Where did you see anyone getting slammed? ”oh, my phone's out of space". That's a slam? "Oh, my phone has no headphone jack" that's slamming the protagonist?.

People who've just spent $1200 on an iPhone X will understandably be a little more likely to interpret anything other than abject praise as a "slam".
 
Phone looks like crap? Try putting an iPhone X and an s8 side to side. Don’t be so arrogant to realize that Samsung actually makes it’s own components while Apple has to come to them to make displays.

So what? Apple's display is way better. It's made to Apple's specifications. Samsung produced OLED's for years and what? they all had bluish greenish tint and unrealistically pumped up saturation. Even S8+ -which is one of the best looking phones out there- has a screen with that unrealistic color tone. Ans Note8's camera area looks like crap... it's so white collar design.

People criticize iPhone X -which I will never buy- notch but that notch is what it separates that phone from the others. All android phones (except s8+ and Xiomi something) are look a-likes. Apple's implementation may not be the best but I applaud them for being balls of steel about this.
 
I'm not sure it's smart to show the competition's product more often than their own.
 
I will agree that Apple needs to transition from Lightning to USB-C. Not their fault that they developed Lightning; but it's time to change.

However, you are dead-wrong about the "Sideloading" thing. Individuals have been able to Sideload Apps on iOS since iOS 8. It's just not very well known.

You can either do it with XCode, if someone publishes the Source (which many have), or you can use the Freeware "Cydia Impactor" to install and Run ".ipa" Files. And with Impactor, you don't even need a Mac.

And all this is completely legit. No Jailbreaking, no special Licensing. Nothing.

http://www.cydiaimpactor.com/

Come on, really? - We both know that if you publish the source code of your app (thus giving out all your intellectual property) that people can use xcode to load it on to their iPhone device. No developer in their right mind (of which I am one) would do that. Giving out my source code just so I can sell apps on my own site instead of through the App Store, out of the question.

As for cydiaimpactor, yeah lets all put a root certificate on our phone, great advice there. These are ridiculous rebuttals from you, sorry but they are.

Oh, and I'm pretty sure Apple tried the multiple apps on a phone thing, and laughed it out of the room.

As for FLAC support, you really DO need to keep up...

http://www.idownloadblog.com/2017/09/14/iphone-x-hardware-flac-codec/

I'm aware that the phones hardware and iOS has FLAC support. The Music app however does not, which is exactly what I said. By the way neither does iTunes. So syncing those songs to the Music app is impossible. You can play them in the Files app if you sync them through Dropbox or iCloud but who is going to play songs from that? - It's not a great experience.

And as far as OLEDs go, there were three major barriers to adoption:

1. Samsung owns a BUNCH of Patents on OLED and AMOLED, and pretty much leads the industry in good color OLED panels.

2. (Related to #1) Samsung wasn't really interested in selling their precious OLED panels (which have yield problems to begin with) to their largest competitor, at anything like a reasonable price.

3. OLEDs have only very recently become reliable enough to be a serious replacement for a phone/iPod that is expected to last several years.

Samsung makes the OLED display on the iPhone X for Apple. Had Samsung not kept pushing OLED into the future Apple would never have had a viable way to bring it to the iPhone X at all. It was Samsungs innovation that has allowed this specific screen to be used on the iPhone X.

The alternatives like LG? - Well look how that worked out for the Pixel 2. If this was some argument against Samsung I think you really failed here, Apple did basically nothing and just waited for Samsung to do all the work. Same could be said for Apples use of Sony sensors on their iPhones instead of developing their own camera sensors.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.