I agree that software are par for the most part, but what I was alluding to is the hardware and software integration and the efficiency that affords, no manufacturer with Android OS can match that. Clearest example are Apples use of so called under-powered SoC/CPU and meager RAM, which outperform in some benchmarks compared to the Samsung flagships like the S7 or S8. iPhone 7 has a 4 cores, but only 2 cores are active at one time, compared to S7 which is a octa-core CPU.
Another example is at the link below.
http://bgr.com/2017/09/29/iphone-8-vs-android-speed-a11-bionic-processor/
Another telling example is the battery size and battery life of iPhones, iPhones traditionally have had far smaller battery capacity and yet have had decent battery life compared to Android phones with bigger battery capacities. I know this comparison is old, but makes the point about iPhone 7 vs S7 edge comparison. iPhone has 54% battery capacity of the S7 edge and yet performs so well compared to S7 edge and outperforms S7 that has 35% more battery capacity.
[doublepost=1510061086][/doublepost]And they still included fingerprint scanners, which is telling in that Samsung doesn't think their face and iris scanners aren't as secure as the fingerprint scanners. In fact the face scanner and iris scanners have not caught on as a industry standard, which could only mean one thing, poor performance or implementation. Samsung has a habit of throwing everything including the kitchen sink at the wall and see what sticks, it is not meant to drive or change direction of the design or UI.
BTW I haven't read any good things about the kitchen sink that was included with the S8, that was a joke.