Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In Japan people commonly exchanged their contact information by beaming it between the two cell phones using infrared. This is because phone numbers were used for calls only, and messaging was done through email, so it saved them from having to enter all the info (other person's name reading, phone number, and address) themselves. This has been a feature on Japanese feature phones going back probably two decades. This also caused some hesitation when smartphones came out that did not have infrared.

I'm not sure what they do now. Probably have a way of sending it through NFC. I think my (U.S.) Sony has such a feature, but I haven't looked to much into it.

ahhh. did not know that. good to know!
 
1. you bet animojis are being copied
2. true depth camera will be
3. the full phone being a screen (iPhone has 2nd highest screen to body ratio and its only below by 0.3 and its some random phone, much higher than Samsung though)
4. they are still trying to copy 3D Touch
5. actual facial recognition, not dumb useless unsecure iris scanning
6. the premium design
7. samsung is also 1/3 the speed/performance of the iPhone but lets be real they lost all ready.
8. Phone X has been given best screen, Samsungs phones are not color accurate, don't have HDR/as wide color gamit, and others look it up, the iPhone is far ahead. And no 4k means nothing.
9. the most important thing... the OS
10. front facing portrait mode or the built in effects for portrait mode

theres 10 reasons the iPhone X is ahead.
bonus: don't think Samsung has dual optic image stabilization
aspect ratio on samsung galaxy series is unusual

also Samsung is scared. they saw the enormous lines for the iPhone X, Samsung has never had a device that has ever been exploding* in popularity
*except actually exploding

Also Samsung never would exist to its extent without the iPhone (both because the idea of the phone itself and for the parts apple buys, Samsung will self destruct once apple leaves them as a supplier FYI, they copied and pasted the design early on to get traction as well, nor are they first in much of anything. and what they are first in is pure crap, then apple waits till it can be done without sacrificing and then Samsung copies them.

It's sad to me you spent all that time putting this list together, and you are completely incorrect on so many... and the rest just silly fan boy nonsense. Enjoy the X.
 
But the Note, S8, and S8 Plus all have higher screen to bezel ratios than the X. Also I'd bet Sammy's gonna keep that uniform top bezel, patent app notwithstanding. Even if they go with a notch, we can say they are copying a page out of Apple's marketing playbook. Dismiss something right up until the moment you adopt it. Larger phones, NFC, wireless charging mats, OLED phones. I doubt they'll go with the notch though. But that hairline... that was funny.

I suspect the higher screen to face ratios is because of the curved edges for the s and because of the sheer size of the screen for the note (lesser overhead of the bezel)
 
The way I see it you tout what’s great and not what isn’t. Apple used to talk about fragmentation when their numbers were good. They’re still good but not as amazingly good. I’ve noticed this is no longer a talking point with them.

It’s also hard to objectively state, particularly in a 30-60 second ad, that your software is better/different. I guess we can argue taking notes with the S pen is showcasing the marriage of software versus hardware, for better or for worse.

St the end of the day I honestly don’t believe the software argument holds much water anyway. Things are about on par there these days. Everyone shouting from the rooftops that Android is garbage or iOS is limited are just super fans. My opinions of course.
I agree that software are par for the most part, but what I was alluding to is the hardware and software integration and the efficiency that affords, no manufacturer with Android OS can match that. Clearest example are Apples use of so called under-powered SoC/CPU and meager RAM, which outperform in some benchmarks compared to the Samsung flagships like the S7 or S8. iPhone 7 has a 4 cores, but only 2 cores are active at one time, compared to S7 which is a octa-core CPU.

83907.png

83887.png


Another example is at the link below.
http://bgr.com/2017/09/29/iphone-8-vs-android-speed-a11-bionic-processor/

Another telling example is the battery size and battery life of iPhones, iPhones traditionally have had far smaller battery capacity and yet have had decent battery life compared to Android phones with bigger battery capacities. I know this comparison is old, but makes the point about iPhone 7 vs S7 edge comparison. iPhone has 54% battery capacity of the S7 edge and yet performs so well compared to S7 edge and outperforms S7 that has 35% more battery capacity.


83901.png

[doublepost=1510061086][/doublepost]
They already have face and iris scanners. Their face scanner lacks depth detection, however.
And they still included fingerprint scanners, which is telling in that Samsung doesn't think their face and iris scanners aren't as secure as the fingerprint scanners. In fact the face scanner and iris scanners have not caught on as a industry standard, which could only mean one thing, poor performance or implementation. Samsung has a habit of throwing everything including the kitchen sink at the wall and see what sticks, it is not meant to drive or change direction of the design or UI.
BTW I haven't read any good things about the kitchen sink that was included with the S8, that was a joke.
 
Last edited:
Apple should fire back with a FaceID commercial showing someone printing a picture of their friend and getting into that “other” phone.

Also show a guy eating and he wants to take a quick picture of something and has food on his hands, smears it all over his camera lens using fingerprint unlock and show the picture with all the mess...
 
I should ad that I’m not even a note user. I’m happy with the iPhone X in almost every way. I just t
I agree that software are par for the most part, but what I was alluding to is the hardware and software integration and the efficiency that affords, no manufacturer with Android OS can match that. Clearest example are Apples use of so called under-powered SoC/CPU and meager RAM, which outperform in some benchmarks compared to the Samsung flagships like the S7 or S8. iPhone 7 has a 4 cores, but only 2 cores are active at one time, compared to S7 which is a octa-core CPU.

83907.png

83887.png


Another example is at the link below.
http://bgr.com/2017/09/29/iphone-8-vs-android-speed-a11-bionic-processor/

Another telling example is the battery size and battery life of iPhones, iPhones traditionally have had far smaller battery capacity and yet have had decent battery life compared to Android phones with bigger battery capacities. I know this comparison is old, but makes the point about iPhone 7 vs S7 edge comparison. iPhone has 54% battery capacity of the S7 edge and yet performs so well compared to S7 edge and outperforms S7 that has 35% more battery capacity.


83901.png

[doublepost=1510061086][/doublepost]And they still included fingerprint scanners, which is telling in that Samsung doesn't think their face and iris scanners aren't as secure as the fingerprint scanners. In fact the face scanner and iris scanners have not caught on as a industry standard, which could only mean one thing, poor performance or implementation. Samsung has a habit of throwing everything including the kitchen sink at the wall and see what sticks, it is not meant to drive or change direction of the design or UI.
BTW I haven't read any good things about the kitchen sink that was included with the S8, that was a joke.
i personally don’t put much credence in benchmarks either way but I can understand their use as a talking point. In real world use the devices either work or they don’t. My nexus gets the job done and it’s been chugging along for a couple years. My iPhone 6s Plus only got an upgrade because I thought the X was lovely and I needed a new battery (may as well justify an additional $920 right?!)

I think there are far fewer enthusiasts out there than we at MR think. I’ve been the enthusiast. When I was gamingnin college I was dumping st least $500 a year into my PC for upgrades.

Battery on the x is phenomenal. In some tests it even blew away the 8+ (which the note blew away too, for what it’s worth). I am legitimately impressed by that because that’s something everyone can tangibly experience.

This isn’t me disagreeing with you. I just don’t think that in practice the 3D benchmarks and browser benchmarks and etc make much of a difference to the average user. There’s a reason why Apple literally never mentions them beyond passing phrases like “it’s five times faster than kat year”.
 
Apple should fire back with a FaceID commercial showing someone printing a picture of their friend and getting into that “other” phone.

Also show a guy eating and he wants to take a quick picture of something and has food on his hands, smears it all over his camera lens using fingerprint unlock and show the picture with all the mess...

On your first "come back", nice try but I'll take my chances on someone pulling that off. I try not to let people get close enough to take high res IR images of my irises, and measure my eyeballs for curvature. I guess I need to keep an eye on my optometrist... or wait, not keep an eye on him!

In a statement, the company said the attack requires “a rare combination of circumstances” to pull off. “It would require the unlikely situation of having possession of the high-resolution image of the smartphone owner’s iris with IR camera, a contact lens and possession of their smartphone at the same time. We have conducted internal demonstrations under the same circumstances, however, [and] it was extremely difficult to replicate such a result.”

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ris-scanner-german-hackers-biometric-security

On your second comeback, you realize that there are many iPhone models that have a FPS, and its part of the home button. So your messy hands experiment would get food down into the home button... that probably would do more damage than getting it on top of a sealed camera lens that can easily be wiped off.
 
I should ad that I’m not even a note user. I’m happy with the iPhone X in almost every way. I just t

i personally don’t put much credence in benchmarks either way but I can understand their use as a talking point. In real world use the devices either work or they don’t. My nexus gets the job done and it’s been chugging along for a couple years. My iPhone 6s Plus only got an upgrade because I thought the X was lovely and I needed a new battery (may as well justify an additional $920 right?!)

I think there are far fewer enthusiasts out there than we at MR think. I’ve been the enthusiast. When I was gamingnin college I was dumping st least $500 a year into my PC for upgrades.

Battery on the x is phenomenal. In some tests it even blew away the 8+ (which the note blew away too, for what it’s worth). I am legitimately impressed by that because that’s something everyone can tangibly experience.

This isn’t me disagreeing with you. I just don’t think that in practice the 3D benchmarks and browser benchmarks and etc make much of a difference to the average user. There’s a reason why Apple literally never mentions them beyond passing phrases like “it’s five times faster than kat year”.
No disagreement from me. CPU benchmarks are just that, benchmarks - a reference point, real life usage is completely different. In most situations a small percentage of users will benefit from the difference in performance, which is analogous to car manufacturers who use engine HP/Torque numbers as a marketing tool, very few people drive their cars at the limit of capability, and in most real life situations, that kind of driving is unsafe.
But what I draw from that is how Apple is able to optimize just because of it's control of hardware and software, which very few other manufacturers can do, I think only Samsung might be able to come close to what Apple is able to do, but then software is completely out of their domain and inefficiencies start piling up.

And with Apple control of software, the benefits of the hardware performance can be realized by Apple controlling application development framework.

Battery life on the other hand, is something that is tangible for every user.

X looks like to be a sweet phone, my 6s is doing fine with what I do with it and is very fluid to use. So I am holding myself back form upgrading.
And my mother uses a 5s and for her it's been fine for 4 years, even with slightly reduced battery capacity. Until her eyesight starts going downhill, she probably won't want to upgrade to a larger screen phone. I have no reason not to believe that your Nexus is still a capable device.

I contend that Android is a great OS, I have tried it but I have my reasons to stay with Apple, everyone has to make their own decision, but too many make decision based on herd mentality or trends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lordofthereef
I love my iPhone 10 but Samsung trolling the hell out of the Apple faithful and legit making them angry is hilarious as hell lmao. Some of y’all are taking this way too serious lol
 
I love my iPhone 10 but Samsung trolling the hell out of the Apple faithful and legit making them angry is hilarious as hell lmao. Some of y’all are taking this way too serious lol

Apple fans are angry about it?
[doublepost=1510077648][/doublepost]
1. you bet animojis are being copied
2. true depth camera will be
3. the full phone being a screen (iPhone has 2nd highest screen to body ratio and its only below by 0.3 and its some random phone, much higher than Samsung though)
4. they are still trying to copy 3D Touch
5. actual facial recognition, not dumb useless unsecure iris scanning
6. the premium design
7. samsung is also 1/3 the speed/performance of the iPhone but lets be real they lost all ready.
8. Phone X has been given best screen, Samsungs phones are not color accurate, don't have HDR/as wide color gamit, and others look it up, the iPhone is far ahead. And no 4k means nothing.
9. the most important thing... the OS
10. front facing portrait mode or the built in effects for portrait mode

theres 10 reasons the iPhone X is ahead.
bonus: don't think Samsung has dual optic image stabilization
aspect ratio on samsung galaxy series is unusual

also Samsung is scared. they saw the enormous lines for the iPhone X, Samsung has never had a device that has ever been exploding* in popularity
*except actually exploding

Also Samsung never would exist to its extent without the iPhone (both because the idea of the phone itself and for the parts apple buys, Samsung will self destruct once apple leaves them as a supplier FYI, they copied and pasted the design early on to get traction as well, nor are they first in much of anything. and what they are first in is pure crap, then apple waits till it can be done without sacrificing and then Samsung copies them.


And don't forget to add that, shortly after Apple released iOS 11 that Google announced they are now developing an Augmented Reality API for Android. Oh... and they are going to try and match Apple by creating their own video chat app similar to FaceTime.
 
Maybe Samsung thinks people are stupid?
Maybe some people are stupid?
[doublepost=1510079396][/doublepost]
Apple fans are angry about it?
[doublepost=1510077648][/doublepost]


And don't forget to add that, shortly after Apple released iOS 11 that Google announced they are now developing an Augmented Reality API for Android. Oh... and they are going to try and match Apple by creating their own video chat app similar to FaceTime.

Google had AR API for their own phones way before Apple (read about Tango). They also have had advanced video chat (Hangouts) for a long time.
 
Maybe some people are stupid?
[doublepost=1510079396][/doublepost]

Google had AR API for their own phones way before Apple (read about Tango). They also have had advanced video chat (Hangouts) for a long time.


Then I guess they don't need this: https://www.thurrott.com/mobile/and...ounces-new-augmented-reality-platform-android

I guess I should say that they are making their Duo app so that it's part of the OS, like how FaceTime works: https://hassanmohammednet.wordpress...acetime-by-building-video-calls-into-android/
 
It's sad to me you spent all that time putting this list together, and you are completely incorrect on so many... and the rest just silly fan boy nonsense. Enjoy the X.

Took about 2.5 min as it’s easy. The list doesn’t include the OS features android copies or are still trying to copy, or the face Touch ID only exsists because of apple
 
Took about 2.5 min as it’s easy. The list doesn’t include the OS features android copies or are still trying to copy, or the face Touch ID only exsists because of apple

I'm sure it is easy when you just make stuff up. I'm guessing you don't even know which parts are factually just incorrect.
 
The reason why I like Apple Ads are because they do not focus or bash the completion. They focus on what they do well. They never compare to others. Branding is everything and at its best.

Apple focuses on their brand only. If you were running a car ad campaign, you wouldn’t want to focus on what that brand is doing. You’d focus on your product and that’s it. There will be worst products out there and there will be better products too. The key is to not focus on what your competitors are doing. Especially in a television spot where millions are watching.

This goes too you to Microsoft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MH01 and Martyimac
Piggy backing off of the X’s current popularity to try and lure people to their phones. Only problem is it was more of an iPhone commercial than an advertisement for their own phone.
Except for the part with the dongle for use with wired headphones - that's been a sore point with quite a few folks since the day of "courage". Purchasing a new model iPhone to replace my 6S+ would be a no brainer for me if they retained the phone jack. For the time being, Android still provides that as an option on their phones. The next year will also be a big test on the Face ID feature. If it proves to have the same or better security than fingerprints, and to have no IR ill effects on eyes, that will be the primary revolutionary addition with the X. Generally, a successful design will induce competitive imitation by competing brands. You can bet the competition is paying close attention to the success or failure of the Face ID technology. I think they have done the same with the phone jack issue. Most Android phones still retain it along with bluetooth as an option. I look forward to purchasing both an iMac as well as an iPad Pro this next year. I still find both the Apple desktops and tablets to offer superior product than most PCs and other tablets, especially now that Apple is beginning to standardize iMacs with SSD storage, and yes, a really nice stylus for use with the iPad Pros.
 
Ever heard of writing to text transcription? It's not natively supported on iOS but it's been around for over half a decade on other mobile platforms.

Woah my mistake, running OCR on a note and correcting is way easier and more practical than entering the contact directly.

/s
 
After careful consideration... I honestly don't expect this commercial to have much effect on Apple or its users.

Here's what happened when Samsung launched their first "attack ad" against the iPhone in November 2011:

RDecN46.jpg


iPhone sales have always had ups and downs. I'm not sure it's directly related to anything Samsung says. :)
 
Last edited:
You'd think companies would have learned by now that ridiculing the competition is not a winning strategy. As an iPhone user, why would I want to switch to a product from a company that has basically told me I'm an idiot for not buying their product I the first place? Nobody ever wins a debate by insulting a competitor. If anything, ads like this make Samsung look as though they are desperately trying to hang onto their existing base rather than expanding it. If they feel their product is superior, as I would expect them to, they should tout its superior features, not try to make people who didn't buy it feel stupid for not doing so. Apple got away with "I'm a Mac ... I'm a PC" because it was genuinely funny, but I'd bet they found that after a while, even that campaign became counterproductive. To win in the marketplace you need a truly superior product and good marketing that PERSUADES, not ridicules.

I agree with you with your points. But.... "Nobody ever wins a debate by insulting a competitor"? I believe one person not only did this over and over again, but became our current president.
 
After careful consideration... I honestly don't expect this commercial to have much effect on Apple or its users.

I don't think it's supposed to have an affect on loyal iPhone users.

But as we know from similar past ad campaigns, they do attract attention and sales to Samsung nevertheless.

--
You know what I thought was a wasted ad campaign? HTC's phone ads featuring Robert Downey Jr.

I mean, they had Ironman for goodness' sake, and they let their ad agency create truly bizarre ads that no one understood or cared about.

And that reminds me of the first Palm Pre ads, which were just as bizarre, although more beautifully laid out.
 
The reason why I like Apple Ads are because they do not focus or bash the completion. They focus on what they do well. They never compare to others. Branding is everything and at its best.

Apple focuses on their brand only. If you were running a car ad campaign, you wouldn’t want to focus on what that brand is doing. You’d focus on your product and that’s it. There will be worst products out there and there will be better products too. The key is to not focus on what your competitors are doing. Especially in a television spot where millions are watching.

This goes too you to Microsoft.
um, well...uh....except for all those commercials where they did exactly that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.