Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Curved displays are something that appeal to typical Samsung phone purchasers. Gimmicks to show your phone is more bad-ass than the next guy's.

All show and no go, just like a curved display.

I'd be shocked if Apple goes with a curved display; most of their customers are out of high school and/or past their early 20s.

What are you talking about? The non-edge S7 has a curved display too, but no one ever claims it looks weird. I have an iphone and s7 and the s7 is more comfortable to use, expecially for video and web browsing.

And I don't buy your broad brushstrokes that most of apples customers are over 20. Apple has always had a strong education presence, and from what I see they still do.
 
Yikes. The rumors re the next iPhone just keep getting worse and worse. Seems like this dreamy idea we had for an all glass all display iPhone were just that, and now they're resorting to shoehorning features for the sake of raising costs and making higher margins and pleasing customers with an update. I hate to join the boo crowd, but Apple, you're not the same.
 
What are you talking about? The non-edge S7 has a curved display too, but no one ever claims it looks weird. I have an iphone and s7 and the s7 is more comfortable to use, expecially for video and web browsing.

And I don't buy your broad brushstrokes that most of apples customers are over 20. Apple has always had a strong education presence, and from what I see they still do.

You're saying the majority of Apple's customers are 19 years old and younger? Really? And that group is buying 100M or so iPhones a year?
 
Samsung take a note. You have to wait with copying , so nobody notices.

edit: lol. Some people couldnt see the humor. Let's explain the joke(worst thing when you have to explain it , making it unfunny)

It means Apple copies Samsung this time and nobody notices because it took them long to make this decision, unlike Samsung who copies immediately. Samsung is the leader on mobile OLED Displays and they even have curved models like their edge models, since November 2014 (Note Edge).

Since its release they keep improving the curved desgin and its functionality with apps and notification bars (I personally like the Knight rider one, when your phone is layed down on the table with face down).

So I am saying again. Samsung, if you copy you have to do it Apple's way (although Apple prefers to steal , since they are great artists / quote: Steve jobs)
 
You're saying the majority of Apple's customers are 19 years old and younger? Really? And that group is buying 100M or so iPhones a year?

Is it so hard for you to see their influence? Business invest in tools that will attract the people they want, guys invest in Cologne that will attract the women they want, and parents/schools will buy the tools that support the kids the best. They may not sign the receipt, but they are probably involved in most of apples sales.

And nice dodge of the curve screen objection.
 
Is it so hard for you to see their influence? Business invest in tools that will attract the people they want, guys invest in Cologne that will attract the women they want, and parents/schools will buy the tools that support the kids the best. They may not sign the receipt, but they are probably involved in most of apples sales.

And nice dodge of the curve screen objection.


Dodge? Are you serious? You said you liked your curved screen. I don't like them - it's a gimmick - as I said above. There's nothing to dodge. Did you seriously think I was going to say you were wrong about something you said you liked?

OK, got it. From your, "And I don't buy your broad brushstrokes that most of apples customers are over 20," you still believe that half of Apple's customer base is 19 years old and younger.
 
Last edited:
Dodge? Are you serious? You said you liked your touch screen, I don't. There's nothing to dodge. Did you seriously think I was going to say you were wrong about something you said you liked?

OK, got it. You believe that half of Apple's customer base is 19 years old and younger.

Well it's definitely not a gimick. It has made the device easier to use, hence the reason apple would consider using it.
 
Can somebody explain exactly what curved display means? I'm out of the loop on this.
Does it mean just the edges are curved as the screen continues down the sides of the phone and the front face is flat...

OR

Does it mean that the actual face is curved slightly, with the centre of the screen slightly higher than the two edges?

If it's the latter, what are the benefits of this? Because I can't think of any.
 
I dislike the arrogant fans who constantly accuse Samsung of copying Apple rumours...

I guess that makes you one of them who accuse Samsung of copying rumours then...

MOST CERTAINLY DOES MATTER WHOS FIRST!

The hypocrisy is facinating to read as it's so rife.

Now I'll await the accusations of being a Samsung fan or employee.....

Oh the irony. This was a fun mess to read.
[doublepost=1482103990][/doublepost]
Can somebody explain exactly what curved display means? I'm out of the loop on this.
Does it mean just the edges are curved as the screen continues down the sides of the phone and the front face is flat...

OR

Does it mean that the actual face is curved slightly, with the centre of the screen slightly higher than the two edges?

If it's the latter, what are the benefits of this? Because I can't think of any.
IMG_3023.JPG
 
We all must admit despite the latest iPhone's using LCD panels, these are the best looking displays so far on the market and it proves that Apple's "tweaking" of "normal hardware" has it's rewards as I have the iPhone 7 plus and the screen is the best I have seen from Apple. Yes Samsung have been using AMOLED (Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diod) and OLED for many years, but their screens and imagery are too over-saturated to a point it looks artificial and the human eye can pick this looks fake straight away as it's not natural - too overemphasised.

The info read about OLED so far indicates plastic is used for curved displays, and glass is used for flat displays, as naturally plastic is more malleable / flexible. Glass can be bent using heat however this would be a little heavier and slightly more expensive. As for it breaking, they could make it tempered as well (heat treated) like safety glass on cars. Getting technical: Samsung also use Pentile Matrix Display OLED where the subpixels share the RGB colours, whereas RGB OLED use individual RGB subpixels - no sharing - which gives brighter colours and better contrast especially off-angle. Read the full details here: http://tinyurl.com/hws6glf - this also explains why some panels have a bias towards blue / green and may appear off-colour when viewing from the side.

However, the drawbacks of OLED ironically are battery power. See LCD has a back-light which uses most of the power for the display, however for most uses its power usage does not drastically shift from black backgrounds to white backgrounds. While OLED has no back-light, it will consume around 40% of the power of LCD when displaying an image primarily black, and for the majority of images it will consume 60%-80% of the power of LCD. However an OLED can use three times as much power to display an image with a white background, such as a document or website.

Colour Balance Issues - OLED - Additionally, as the OLED material used to produce blue light degrades significantly more rapidly than the materials that produce other colours, blue light output will decrease relative to the other colours of light. This variation in the differential colour output will change the colour balance of the display and is much more noticeable than a decrease in overall luminance. This can be avoided partially by adjusting colour balance, but this may require advanced control circuits and interaction with the user, which is unacceptable for users. More commonly, though, manufacturers optimise the size of the R, G and B sub-pixels to reduce the current density through the sub-pixel in order to equalise lifetime at full luminance. For example, a blue sub-pixel may be 100% larger than the green sub-pixel. The red sub-pixel may be 10% smaller than the green.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brazzan
Get used to it, phones will look more and more alike with each passing year and so will the operating systems. Anyone can grab any phone at this point and know exactly how to use it. Buy what you like and use it until something else tickles your fancy. Curved screens are nice and have their place, if you don't like them don't buy a phone with a curved screen.
 
their screens and imagery are too over-saturated to a point it looks artificial and the human eye can pick this looks fake straight away as it's not natural - too overemphasised.

Even if every site can agree for a fact Samsung screens are better. You say NO because in your opinion... the colors are too saturated. Cool bro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McCool71
If apple can't supply enough, maybe apple should build up a supply instead of rushing them for September. Start selling in October.

What do you think Apple has been trying to do for the past few years, if not build up the manufacturing capacity for oled displays?
 
Apple is not a fan of Apple. Apple is a business. Samsung is an "enemy" of Apple fans, not Apple. It's business, plain and simple. In business, companies work together all the time while competing with each other. Apple competes against LG, Sony, Samsung, Sharp, etc. All of those companies are suppliers as well. Automotive companies compete yet they share parts and technologies all the time.

When you cease to view business relationships through fan lenses, the relationship will lose it's weirdness.
You missed my point. I understand that companies which compete can also collaborate. I just find that compartmentalization curious, particularly regarding products whose development is such a closely held secret. Fandom (which you've misplaced) has nothing to do with it.

Imagine a chef who prepared the ingredients for the chef at the competing restaurant across the street. That's what we're talking about here, and it's commonness in the tech industry does make the notion any less odd to me.

Or, using your example, does Toyota build radiators for Honda? Does Chevrolet design the engine for Ford? Please provide an example in the automobile industry where the manufacturer of a part used by a company to build an end product (a car) is also in the business of manufacturing that same end product (a car). There might be one, but I can't think of it right now. And even if you can, it's still a curious aspect of the business world.
 
Does Chevrolet design the engine for Ford? Please provide an example in the automobile industry where the manufacturer of a part used by a company to build an end product (a car) is also in the business of manufacturing that same end product (a car). There might be one, but I can't think of it right now. And even if you can, it's still a curious aspect of the business world.

The GM and Ford 10 speed transmission collaboration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kdarling
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.