I don't see the mentioned article on the WSJ ( I have a subscription and access to all ). Would MR please post a link to cite the source?
Thank you!
Thank you!
And $20 in the US
Historically, the American experiment was to have as little as possible mandated by the government. It was/is thought that industry was best left to figure out what they thought was best and have the market place decide what is best for how people live their life. Of course there are safety standards etc. so that there is a flow to society but we Mac/iPhone users wouldn't be happy if majority ruled and we lived by how Android decided the connectivity standards along with MS running on all PCs. The best usually wins in the long run but government mandates slow the progress toward that end. While at times it can be inconvenient, I perfer our traditional role of less government mandates.Why don't we have campaigns like this here in the US?
It would be nice just having 1 cable that does it all. I'm sure someone in here will prove me wrong though. . . .![]()
USB C had quick-charge standards built in, which would be lovely.I don't get why they would change. The port is primarily used for charging. Some folks will use it for wired headphones. Lightning does charging better than USB-C because (A) there are more lightning cables out there and (B) Lightning is a more sturdy port. Lightning does wired headphones fine. Only a small fraction of people will occasionally do data transfer (which is what USB-C is good for) on an iOS device. And the amount of times that transfer is large enough and time pressured enough that speed is an issue will be another small fraction of those few transfers.
I'd rather have a good sturdy charging port on my iPhone. Now if wireless charging is included, then maybe I don't really care what the port is. Heck, if there is wireless charging then I likely will rarely use the port at all since I use AirPods for my headsets most of the time now (and have other bluetooth headsets already as well).
Lightning was implemented in iOS devices roughly 2 years before USB-C was even finalized.
Ditching Lightning for USB-C is the smartest move Apple could make. Seriously, it would make everyone's lives so much easier.
Some perspective people, please...Ditching Lightning for USB-C is the smartest move Apple could make. Seriously, it would make everyone's lives so much easier.
Poor poets! Even in my eventual dictatorship I can assure all poets they will not be restricted to a 5 year lifespan!I dunno, most poets live a lot longer than 5 years.![]()
When I travel (light), I only bring one set of charger+cable for both my iPhone and iPad with me. For charging other devices (see below) I just add another cable or two. If I travel with my MBP, I need to add the MBP charger (including cable). But if that charger could also charge my iPhone or iPad and other devices, I get more flexibility for charging (currently the MBP itself serves as the charger for other devices).Since I get a cable and charger with every device I buy, I can charge them all at the same time, regardless of what connectors they have. The only time using the same cable for charging two devices will matter to me is when one of the cables I own fails - I can make do until I get a replacement.
I might have made more sense to include a USB-C to Lightning cable with new Macs that only have USB-C ports than to include a USB-C to Lightning cable with iPhones. Most non-Macs with USB-C ports still have USB-A ports and thus the iPhone can get by with 'only' having a USB-A to Lightning cable, while most Mac users probably have iPhones.Meantime, why should I care if I can use the cable interchangeably with a MB or MBP that I don't (and am not likely) to own? My Macs have USB-A, all my existing chargers and my car have USB-A... Yeah, my next iMac will likely have USB-C, but that's some years off. So what matters to me isn't the connector on the iPhone, it'll be the connector at the other end of the cable.
I have an iPhone and an iPad that each need Lightning. But I also have non-Apple Bluetooth headphones, a wireless hotspot and a camera that need USB micro. I have multiple external HDDs that need USB mini. I have other external HDDs and another camera that need USB3 micro. I have a yet another camera that needs a proprietary USB plug.Interchangeability of cables is a bonus, if it's possible.
I doubt it'll happen. The thinness and precision of the iPhone oppose USB-C.Pretty sure that those lighting to USB-c connectors break the USB-c power delivery specifications and won't work with most chargers that aren't made by Apple... Here's hoping they show the same "courage" they showed when getting rid of the headphone jack and replace the lighting port with USB-c on all iPhones released this year.
I wonder if there is a way to make one port that can accept both USB-C and Lightening. I understand there is a wafer in the middle of a USB-C Female port. However, I wonder if it can be designed flexible like those old patents we saw for Apple trying to make USB-A multi-directional. Then when that wafer moves out of the way for the lightning connector it'll press it against the lightning pins on one side of the housing. Then we can have our cake and eat it too! (Patent Pending?)
I don't see the mentioned article on the WSJ ( I have a subscription and access to all ). Would MR please post a link to cite the source?
Thank you!
It's an Apple connector, it's NOT standard and never WILL be an industry standard for that reason alone.It should have become the standard
Historically, the American experiment was to have as little as possible mandated by the government. It was/is thought that industry was best left to figure out what they thought was best and have the market place decide what is best for how people live their life. Of course there are safety standards etc. so that there is a flow to society but we Mac/iPhone users wouldn't be happy if majority ruled and we lived by how Android decided the connectivity standards along with MS running on all PCs. The best usually wins in the long run but government mandates slow the progress toward that end. While at times it can be inconvenient, I perfer our traditional role of less government mandates.
Additionally, be careful of what you wish for… one ring to rule them all wasn't so good for Middle Earth.
That proprietary port, which did everything micro-USB could not, is the reason USB type C even exists...that, and Apple helping to design USB type C.
[doublepost=1488304861][/doublepost]
Oh, it's going to happen...what you just described is why someone has a job.