Ah, the irony.Hey Fanboy...
Your master...
quit posting lame insults.
Ah, the irony.Hey Fanboy...
Your master...
quit posting lame insults.
the pre is sexier than all of you 5 star generals etc
Hey Fanboy, seems that you serve in the same platoon like the general did.
Your master was posting biased BS. Same advice to you : State an argument and quit posting lame insults.
First of all, Captain, there is nothing less in the universe like your username that i would care for.
It even does not matter which phones you call your own that could do breakfast for you in the morning.
Just by stating something sucks although your current handheld is not able to manage it too some kind of disqualifies your lame arguments.
Nobody cares that you may not like it. Although with an Apple-Logo on top you would do.
And by the way, keep your religious attitude there where it belongs. I don't care about that, corporal.
that is COMPLETELY false... please state your facts about this
the appstore is lightyears ahead of ANY and i mean ANY application store any phone is offer and that is FACT
iPhone sacrifies connectivity, because you aren't allow to multitask.
Geeez, this rumor of iPhone cannot Multi-task is getting old. I guess when I play games like NFSU and playing my favorite track on the iPod portion, while MobileMe keeps me in sync and receives email, SMS.... oh wait, the iPhone can't multi-task.![]()
The iPhone can't multitask with third-party programs. Better?
I just proved to you that it does. See post above. Better?
Are you really trying to argue the iPhone does TRUE multitasking?
My Palm 755p played music while I was playing a game...but it most certianly could not multi-task.
In fact, Apple went out of the way to state they thought background apps drained the battery too fast and they weren't going to implement it in the iPhone.
Yet you are here arguing the iPhone Multitasks?
Come on....its the biggest complaint (next to AT&T)
if you dont understand what multitasking is, go check out wikipedia.I just proved to you that it does. See post above. Better?
Your arguing. I just proved it to you. So you can stop saying the iPhone cannot/does not/incapable of multitasking.
Geeez, this rumor of iPhone cannot Multi-task is getting old. I guess when I play games like NFSU and playing my favorite track on the iPod portion, while MobileMe keeps me in sync and receives email, SMS.... oh wait, the iPhone can't multi-task.![]()
I just proved to you that it does. See post above. Better?
Everyone knows the iPhone can do limited multi-tasking...
User cannot multitasking (connectivity context) in iPhone (by default Apple setup).
If you want to digg more on multitasking and processor context switching, matters of computer science, try some books of tauenbaum as introduction.
and you think 3 apple app "limited multitasking" can hold a candle in front of deksto-level multitasking of the Pre?Much better. You see there are these running around saying it cannot... period. Say limited multitasking, your correct. Much better. But to run around with a flag screaming "cannot", then your wrong.
Much better. You see there are these running around saying it cannot... period. Say limited multitasking, your correct. Much better. But to run around with a flag screaming "cannot", then your wrong.
Cause we are talking about true multi-tasking.
Not gimped.
But if it makes you feel better:
"Yes the iPhone can do gimped multitasking."
Don't try to compare the multitasking to the Pre however.
I never did. I'm correcting the BS that you and your cohorts are spouting all over the net.
I never did. I'm correcting the BS that you and your cohorts are spouting all over the net.
I don't need to, I just know what it is. I'm just tired of seeing these incorrect statements declaring it as an absolute rule.
If you want to know what multitask is, read some on schedulling and context switching.
Even in internet, semantics matter.