Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sorry folk, but it's winter here in Big Sky country and we ain't seein' green until March-April IF we are lucky!

miscpix2998.jpg
 
It's winter in the South, too. We don't get this stuff often, and we get this much of it even less often.

 

I looked this up in my Peterson's field guide, and it looks more like a Harrier. Both birds are similar in size and coloring, but the Cooper's hawk has more white ahead of the tail. The telling factor is flight pattern. Harriers are floaters. They drift along at low levels so slow that they can hover. The wings are held in a V during flight.

Dale
 
I looked this up in my Peterson's field guide, and it looks more like a Harrier. Both birds are similar in size and coloring, but the Cooper's hawk has more white ahead of the tail. The telling factor is flight pattern. Harriers are floaters. They drift along at low levels so slow that they can hover. The wings are held in a V during flight.

Dale

Thank you so much for the clarification. I have the hardest time identifying these birds even with my Birds of British Columbia book.
This guy was flying pretty low when trying to catch some lunch but fairly quickly. No hovering. The Bald Eagle that was around was hovering. I never seen a Bald Eagle hover like a Dragon Fly or Humming Bird.
When this Hawk or Harrier was perched on some logs I didn't see a white patch on its rump as I know Northern Harriers have that. I couldn't hear its call very well either as there are thousands of ducks in the surrounding ponds so I'm not sure if I heard baby ducks or this bird. Perhaps another but it was fairly high pitched. Like I said, I have a hard time identifying birds unless I'm 4 feet away and I can snap multiple photos in order to compare details.

So you are 100% sure that this is a Northern Harrier? That way I can rename it on my flickr page :)
 
tyrolean-inn-7749.jpg


D700 with 24-70 f2.8 at 24mm, f4, 1/640. ISO 3200

Man, that car looks dangerous to drive fast... the wheelbase is long and narrow, and those skinny tires... good lord. It must have taken some brave dudes to drive one of these at speed.
Nice shots, really liking the vintage machines...
 
Man, that car looks dangerous to drive fast... the wheelbase is long and narrow, and those skinny tires... good lord. It must have taken some brave dudes to drive one of these at speed.
Nice shots, really liking the vintage machines...

Thanks, and that's the end of the car most drivers saw since if this car is any indication, Indy cars of this era didn't have rear view mirrors. This car took 2nd place at the 1953 Indy 500.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.