You're being hysterical.
So where do you draw the line?
You're being hysterical.
This simply shows your ignorance, I would stop posting if I were you. What part of "compressed air" don't you understand? The air is compressed, under pressure, in a can. It's that pressure which causes the air to come out of the can when you push the button. There is nothing about compressing air that harms the ozone layer. You apparently can't differentiate between an aerosolized product that uses natural compressed air versus one containing chlorofluorocarbons, which destroy the ozone layer and are no longer used in consumer goods.
What's that old saying... can't fix stupid?
She signed her post Tia. That's typically a female name, so conversational implicature should alter your grammatical assumptions.
So where do you draw the line?
So if people end up not using their AppleCare warranty, assuming there are no problems within the first 3 years, then Apple should refund what we paid for our AppleCare? Really? Does your healthcare company refund your premium if you don't go to the doctor? Does your auto insurance company refund your insurance annually if you don't file a claim? And if all of us who didn't need our AppleCare were entitled to a refund, how on earth could Apple afford to offer the service in the first place?
An extended warranty is nothing more than insurance. More people pay into the system than it costs in claims, making it a profitable venture for the company enabling them to offer the service in the first place. You're just saying that because the computer may have been dirty in the first place, which has nothing to do with Apple, they should refund the OP because of the condition the laptop was in when the AppleCare warranty was purchased? Huh?
I sure hope you don't apply this faulty logic to your political choices, lord help us all.
My point being was she had a problem under warranty, that they were not willing to fix because of the smoke issue. If the inside was nasty as claimed, then it was obvious the Apple Care was never truly valid.
So you are saying its ok to hide loop holes in fine print so that the entity providing the warranty can loophole their way out?
My main point is the Apple Care was NEVER valid, according to Apples terms.
She truly never had Apple Care. Because since day 1 (even prior to extended Apple Care kicking in) the computer was in an environment that was not in compliance with Apple Cares terms. Legally their isn't an issue, Apple covered that in the fine print. But its kinda a crappy thing to do.
And Apple is pretty good about not doing crappy things to customers.
Do they legally need to refund here, nope.
Is it a crappy thing to take her money, keep it, then deny her based on a loophole? I say yes. Does this type of thing happen everyday with other companies, yes.
I do think Apple needs to let people know more clearly if they smoke their Apple Care is void. If I buy life/health insurance they ask me if i smoke, (I don't, and hate it.) But at least they inform me, they don't wait till i make a claim and then say oh you smoke (i don't) then deny me.
The warranty isn't voided. They clearly said, "clean it and come back".
Dr. John McDougall seems to think so...Tracking back the cancer to its most likely time of initial appearance is based on solid science and reasonable assumptions. Ultimately this is all speculation, mind you, but it does make a certain amount of sense
Yes, we Americans are aware of the damage that smoking can do to your body. I do not smoke but can appreciate your right to do so.
Despite their poor reasoning, I'm going to have to side with Apple's conclusion (i.e. to not honour the warranty) on this one.
Assuming most (if not all) of Apple stores and care centres are located in cities, the amount of toxins one inhales every day most likely significantly outweighs any toxins one could inhale from cleaning a computer that was kept in a smoking environment. Besides, isn't that what biosuits and masks are for? So, Apple's reasoning is faulty.
The OP's problem, which I don't think she's admitting or acknowledging, is that smoking causes damage to electronics. Specifically, the residue from cigarette smoke accumulates on the laser of all DVD, CD, etc. drives, which ultimately renders them unusable as they can no longer read the disc that was inserted. I know because, before I stopped smoking inside my house, I had to replace the laser on my CD player a couple of times due to the smoke.
This is no different that submerging your computer in water; both cigarette smoke and water will void your warranty.
Sorry, OP, you're just going to have to... suck it up.
I do think Apple needs to let people know more clearly if they smoke their Apple Care is void. If I buy life/health insurance they ask me if i smoke, (I don't, and hate it.) But at least they inform me, they don't wait till i make a claim and then say oh you smoke (i don't) then deny me.
AGREED!!!!!
Look smoking is actually one of my biggest pet peeves, I think it is the most stupid thing you can do to your body. I dont understand it, it has no benefit , I actually have WAY less of a problem with pot, than cigarettes. Atleast there is a "benefit" from pot, cigarettes just make you reek and kill you.
I'm assuming the OP just got unlucky with the wrong Apple hippy nerd on the wrong day. (Bio-hazard? FFS)
Do remember that anyone not Apple-authorised opening up the computer will void the warranty so even if you wanted to, you can't spring clean your laptop before taking in for a service under warranty anyway.
Such as?
Too bad your scenario is not even valid. The OP was not denied service, the OP was told to clean her machine and then bring it back for service. Can't you see the difference?
Personally I think it is highly unprofessional and unethical for any doctor especially one that has not likely ever examined him himself, if that is the case, to suggest what might have caused ones illness. It is also in very poor taste for it contributes to a habit of blaming the victim.
We live in a society of extremely judgmental people, as evidenced in this very thread. Peoples hysteria has caused many to suggest that those that smoke should pay for their own treatments.
Those that drink any liquor a all, should they be required to pay for damage done to their liver?
But forgetting all of the men that die from heart attacks from job related stress or, their diet. Forgetting those who cause car accidents. No one suggests such drivers should pay all hospital bills for both themselves and/or victims. How about musicians? Anyone asking them to pay for any/all treatment related to hearing loss/damage? No one suggests that men who have had unprotected sex and contracted HIV or syphilis should pay for their own treatment. Nor bicyclists that fall and have head injuries. Anyone asking them to pay for their therapy?
No, of corse not but everyone does seem to feel in their hysteria about smoking that it is ok to assume that the smoker should pay for his.
I truly doubt if Jobs had died from heart failure they would be talking about it.
Or for that matter, actress Farrah Fawcett? Word has it that women that engage in anal sex without condoms pick up the same "bug" or whatever it that can lead to cervical cancer. Did anyone suggest she and her husband should pay for her cancer treatments?
But I think or hope, my point has been made!
A smoker will tell you there is an advantage. That is why they smoke. Just because you cant understand it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Except that nobody blamed the victim in the McDougall video, where did you come up with that?
No, just clean out your laptop so the poor technician doesn't have to touch your nasty. That's all, no drama. You're the one who wants to go to the media with a response that is way out of proportion to the actual incident.
No, but I probably would put them pretty low on the transplant list.
... calling the men in white coats
Yes it sure has! [where are those men in white coats...]
I believe that's called an addiction.
My wife has a 2010 iMac, and she is a smoker. I have a first gen Intel iMac and she has smoked around it too and I never had a problem with it, ever! With her 2010 iMac, she started getting yellow spots all over the screen. When I brought it to the apple store, the guy said it smelled like cigarette and that it wasn't covered by apple care anymore because of it. I don't know why this iMac has that problem while the other one doesn't, and I also find it funny how tons of other people have had the same problem as my wife (even non smokers), yet apple won't do anything about their iMacs either! But now apple hippies just like to blame everything, saying that cigarette build up in your computer will harm them and that it's the reason that your computer is broken, even though that's not the problem at all. I like apple computers, but they will never get money for apple care from me ever again! (I actually only got it once, and what a waste of money anyway!)
So the AppleCare should not be valid because the OP misused the laptop by allowing it to fill with smoke, thus coating all of the components? Are you hearing yourself?
You really should quit smoking. Your lungs aren't the only people and things that will thank you for not indirectly killing them.Plus, unfortunately as a smoker
Apparently, to you, it is!Is the world really this black-and-white to you?
As it's likely for other laptop vendors to do the same thing, I'd be one of the first callers to say that you are doing a disservice for the rest of us.I WILL do everything i can using all the resources i have in the media here in Toronto to make sure all smokers know NOT to buy apple care warranty as there is no point as a smoker.........
As soon as I can detect a trace of cigarette smoke from you, all bets are off. Smoking is not sexy. Second hand smoke is more dangerous than air/roadside pollution.Whats with all these silly comments about would I cover my machine in poo?
My machine looks as good and as clean as anyones!
I AM ALSo a well dressed person that is very clean, sophisticated and in no way do I look as if I would have a computer covered in "poo" as some of you put it.
I personally think many of the comments here are over the top
Taking pictures of internal fan assemblies void warranties? You're BSing.That will certainly void your AppleCare warranty. Doing the above gives Apple an automatic out and you've just undermined your own complaint.