Just like HillaryYeah, don't tell me .... all the polls have her winning by a landslide too
Just like HillaryYeah, don't tell me .... all the polls have her winning by a landslide too
Record-low unemployment for hispanics and blacks, strong GDP, rising wages. Sorry, what was your point?lmao look at it now buddy,
It's called social acceptance. People didn't want to admit they were voting for trump, they felt ashamed. So they lied to the pollsters and it looked completely opposite of what happened.Just like Hillary![]()
Whatever the reason the polls had it wrong.It's called social acceptance. People didn't want to admit they were voting for trump, they felt ashamed. So they lied to the pollsters and it looked completely opposite of what happened.
Same thing happened in a small town in California decades ago. A black man became mayor but the polls said the other guy would win in a landslide. People didn't want to say they voted for a black guy so the polls were wrong.
To get the truth look at online search terms. People don't lie when they're searching for something. It's very telling. And disturbing.
Not using facebook doesn't avoid facebook. They are collecting data on you even if you don't have a facebook account. Quitting facebook does not stop facebook from doing what they are already doing. Their hands are in too much as well. More than you realize. And facebook is only one example. The others are worse.
This is a very strange idea. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see what is happening. Obviously there are natural cycles, too. But everything from ice core samples to anthropological records tells us that we ARE changing the planet.I think it's awful arrogant to think we, as a species, can significantly alter what happens to the planet. I am reminded of a line in Star Trek IV where Spock says something to the effect:
"Only the arrogance of man would assume the message is intended for him"
While I support the idea of trying to be green I think it needs to be done as technology permits.
Of course they would! There are all kinds of companies out there that want that data. Advertising companies you've never heard of. They will always pay for the data. And political campaigns want that data as well. Everyone could stop using facebook today and they'd still be collecting, and paying for your data from a variety of sources. Data is the most valuable thing. And companies will buy it no matter what.It would not matter if they collected data. They would have no one to sell advertising to and no one to sell business use to and therefore no company..
It's not just android phones, it's iphones too. At last count 70 ios apps are known to be sharing your data with facebook even if you don't have an account. It would blow your mind the data companies have collected on you. And not just now in the digital age but even long before the personal computer. Facebook could fade from public view but they'd still be able to collect and use your data to make them rich. You may think you're not using facebook so they don't have your data but you'd be sooooo wrong. And the data isn't just to advertise to you, they also use it to manipulate you.As for the collection, sure "stop using Facebook" might mean not using some Android phones that collect data behind the scenes, some websites that require Facebook logins (which I never use anyway), etc. It's still possible and easy if there is the will. In addition, if Facebook were fading fast under this scenario, then other companies would pull back providing them the data. That is the power of capitalism. The people get to decide. .
The planet has been warming and cooling all by itself. Yes we have some irrelevant impact but the planet will be just fine. Having said that I am not against being green as long as it is done as technology permits.This is a very strange idea. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see what is happening. Obviously there are natural cycles, too. But everything from ice core samples to anthropological records tells us that we ARE changing the planet.
"I don't believe as a species that man can alter the planet" he says, seconds before pressing the nuclear button.
Of course we can change the planet! The question isn't if, it's how. And at what speed.
But we've been warming the planet since we first starting planting rice in Asia, and became neolithic.
Indeed, without it, we'd be in an ice age right now. So clearly SOME limited amount of global warming has been highly advantageous for our species. But the question is balance. Right now, we are overdoing it. And we probably need technological solutions to fix it.
Have you heard of the project in Iceland, that can take the carbon out of the atmosphere by mixing it with sea water, and turning it into blocks of limestone?
Sure it warms and cools on it's own. But that's not an argument against climate change. Our impact is massive. It should be cooling but instead it's warming. And at a much faster rate than it should be. What will that limit be? Where will it peak? And how will that impact human life? Even our own military sees this and is preparing for sea level rise and human migration and conflict that will arise from this.The planet has been warming and cooling all by itself. Yes we have some irrelevant impact but the planet will be just fine. Having said that I am not against being green as long as it is done as technology permits.
Sure it is. Climate change is warming and cooling. As for your other questions I remind you again of the Star Trek IV statement:Sure it warms and cools on it's own. But that's not an argument against climate change. Our impact is massive. It should be cooling but instead it's warming. And at a much faster rate than it should be. What will that limit be? Where will it peak? And how will that impact human life? Even our own military sees this and is preparing for sea level rise and human migration and conflict that will arise from this.
Whether one believes in climate change or not we should still all want clean air and water and energy independence. And what if by doing that we also create a massive amount of jobs? What's the downside?
I should have said man made climate change. Or perhaps man influenced climate change. Apologies.Sure it is. Warming and cooling is climate change. As for your other questions I remind you again of the Star Trek IV statement:
"Only the arrogance of man would assume the message is intended for him"
I think it's awful arrogant to think we, as a species, can significantly alter what happens to the planet. I am reminded of a line in Star Trek IV where Spock says something to the effect:
"Only the arrogance of man would assume the message is intended for him"
While I support the idea of trying to be green I think it needs to be done as technology permits.
I've never said we don't have an impact. What I'm saying is I believe mankind is awful arrogant to think they are able to tangibly control the warming / cooling of the planet. It's been here much longer than we have and it'll be here long after we're gone.I should have said man made climate change. Apologies.
I'm not sure a quote from a work of fiction is accurate here. As much as I love star trek IV and star trek in general a fictional story about a probe talking to whales doesn't necessarily apply here. Though I see what you're getting at and I appreciate the star trek reference!
I think it's arrogant to assume we can't have an impact. Especially when all the data shows we are. Humans are a massive force of change on this planet.
We're not discussing when President Obama was in office.I’ll take her or any adult college graduate. Record deficits and billions lost on this presidents manufactured shut down - pitiful
Calm down all of your precious snowflakes... Warren was never a mainstream candidate. Wait for Joe Biden to throw his hat into the ring. A Biden-Sanders ticket is a winning ticket.