For the most part, I loved it. Android just isn't iOS though.. and the charge time was insanely bad.
Oh man I had the m7 before the g3...that charge time was crazy lol
For the most part, I loved it. Android just isn't iOS though.. and the charge time was insanely bad.
Only in this instance Samsung come out on top, the iPhone 5/5s are dreadful when it comes to battery life, my phone lasts like 5 hours with all apps shut down, no data and location services.More advertisement for Apple, when will they learn...?
The ad doesn't mention Apple. Only someone who has some insecurity or actuall issue about their phone's performance would think it was aimed at them.
It's ok to admit that it's a clever advert. Regardless of what company is saying it - we all would prefer to not be tethered to a power outlet and yet, the reality is, at times we are.
Take a step back and look at the message instead of defaulting to hating it or thinking it's stupid because of where it came from.
Actually you didn't think it through.
The apple phones are 40% lighter and smaller. Adding the battery case makes them of comparable size and weight to Samsung.
The Samsung phones barely beat apple, despite having twice the size battery.
Samsung also are pretty stupid... if people wanted a 3G only peice of crap that can't run any power apps... they would get a dumb phone. How many people would choose to go 10 hours with a dumb phone over recharging? Probably no one.
(Also is it just me or is America way behind the times: all planes in my country have TV's in the head rests with USB ports - so you can recharge your phone on the flight, everyone does it).
The Samsung phones barely beat apple, despite having twice the size battery.
Samsung also are pretty stupid... if people wanted a 3G only peice of crap that can't run any power apps... they would get a dumb phone. How many people would choose to go 10 hours with a dumb phone over recharging? Probably no one.
...and if you want your iPhone to have decent battery life, you have to make it look like this:
Image
Samsung always do best when they run the tests and can skew the outcome, yet when an independent source does the testing they never fair as well...Food for thought.
Then you have the 'power saving' mode that Samsung are pushing, they even go as far as 'black and whiting' the screen (this is purely for show - it still draws the same amount of power).
Exactly how does Samsung come out on top?Only in this instance Samsung come out on top, the iPhone 5/5s are dreadful when it comes to battery life, my phone lasts like 5 hours with all apps shut down, no data and location services.
My contract is up in 3 months, I'm going for the Samsung S5 or Sony Xperia Z2 (Samsung makes more sense based on the Smart Home).
I don't get it. Android users are some of the worse wall huggers.
I'm honestly not sure what you're talking about with 3G either.
Android as a whole has more market share then apple even in the USA.
You guys are comparing Samsung alone to apple and not all the other android flagships.the old moto droid max easily blows the doors of the 5s in battery life and that cell is 2plus years old
The funny part is that all my friends with galaxies a ALWAYS have an extra battery or charger with them. I have not once brought my charger out because I never need it. Sooooo..... Sorry Samsung but you fail
The Ultra Power Saving Mode concept is to seamlessly turn your $800 smartphone into... a $50 phone. Which, I suppose, may be useful in certain emergencies, but it's something people try to avoid at all costs.
He's referring to the Ultra Power Saving Mode, discussed throughout this thread.
The ad doesn't mention Apple. Only someone who has some insecurity or actuall issue about their phone's performance would think it was aimed at them.
Only in this instance Samsung come out on top, the iPhone 5/5s are dreadful when it comes to battery life, my phone lasts like 5 hours with all apps shut down, no data and location services.
My contract is up in 3 months, I'm going for the Samsung S5 or Sony Xperia Z2 (Samsung makes more sense based on the Smart Home).
The ad doesn't mention Apple. Only someone who has some insecurity or actuall issue about their phone's performance would think it was aimed at them.
It's ok to admit that it's a clever advert. Regardless of what company is saying it - we all would prefer to not be tethered to a power outlet and yet, the reality is, at times we are.
Take a step back and look at the message instead of defaulting to hating it or thinking it's stupid because of where it came from.
Well it comes from Samsung so that pretty much makes it stupid![]()
I was actually thinking about that as well. from an advertising perspective, this ad sort of blows up in samsung's face because it's missing context (context being that iPhones don't have this power saving feature and therefore needs to be charged more often). everyone here understands the context of this ad because we all follow the samsung/apple rivalry closely. but the general public doesn't.
instead what samsung has basically done is branded a whole bunch of power outlets as samsung charging stations.
I was actually thinking about that as well. from an advertising perspective, this ad sort of blows up in samsung's face because it's missing context (context being that iPhones don't have this power saving feature and therefore needs to be charged more often). everyone here understands the context of this ad because we all follow the samsung/apple rivalry closely. but the general public doesn't.
I understood it perfectly. I've seen a lot of spin regarding its meaning. Anyone without blinders on knew what inferences were being made. Cool hipster dude with the skinny jeans and untucked shirt (where have I seen that before? Hmmm, the last development conference with apple) vs the stodgy dorky PC.
Like I said, if anyone wants to know the definition of hypocrisy, they can come spend an hour on macrumors and there will be plenty of examples.