Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Huh? Sure! iPhones never just explode:
http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/5-on-your-side/iphone-explodes-in-st-peters-mans-pocket/265410117

It's the nature of Lithium batteries. They're are at fault, not any one company. In hundreds of millions of batteries, a 0.001% fault rate will lead to a few hundred and very publicized burn cases.

It's been happening for years, example iPhone 4 in 2011:
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/feature/apple/iphone-fires-what-you-need-know-3323855/

Happy problem? I think not.
The happy problem refers to the over reporting of Apple news, not smartphone batteries exploding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
This entire post is comical to me. Bashing a product online, is a symptom of mental issue? LMAO what in the hell? So I guess all the Apple faithful on here who randomly bash Samsung and Microsoft also suffer from this same mental issue?

And nobody is stopping you from having a normal convo on this site. You're basically upset b/c not everybody here eats up everything Apple puts out and basically you can't handle a differing opinion. Again, that's comical to me. You can bash Google, Microsoft, Samsung, Sony, hell even Apple...and I'd just offer my opinion on the matter and be done with it. I wouldn't take it personally b/c it ain't that serious. But someone saying something negative about Apple, upsets you that much? The hilarity of it all.

Dude, don't take things so serious lol. Not everybody here is going to share the same opinion on Apple as you do

Knew it. I had you pegged from the first comment. Try reading what I said instead of hearing what you "think" I said. Then you might post something relevant.
 
Huh? Sure! iPhones never just explode:
http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/5-on-your-side/iphone-explodes-in-st-peters-mans-pocket/265410117

It's the nature of Lithium batteries. They're are at fault, not any one company. In hundreds of millions of batteries, a 0.001% fault rate will lead to a few hundred and very publicized burn cases.

It's been happening for years, example iPhone 4 in 2011:
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/feature/apple/iphone-fires-what-you-need-know-3323855/

Happy problem? I think not.

You're like the 10th person to try googling for this and find isolated cases of batteries having issues in iPhones. Samsung have admitted to a 0.1% failure rate, not a 0.001%. 1 in a 1000 batteries in Samsung Galaxy Note 7's may explode with normal use.
 
c) should tell you not to buy further vehicles from the companies in question

Really, you think I should not buy cars from a company that did not issue a recall within two days after finding a problem?

In real life, it takes time to figure out affected vehicles, contact owners, build replacement part inventory, and train for what must be done.

Question: are you a student?

Read the article. Samsung is recalling all Note 7's.

Read the source article. Samsung did not said they were recalling all devices. That was a conjecture on the part of the reporter, and one that makes no sense if you think about it.

To me it sounded like they only plan on recalling the relatively few affected units that have the bad battery.

The amount of whining about people intentionally bending their iPhones was already off the charts. Now you have batteries exploding in people's pockets and an entire line of smart phone being recalled and it's no big deal.

Nobody said it's not something that requires prompt attention. However, it's only been about two days since they stopped shipments to figure out the problem.

As for the bending, Apple would get less criticism if they had simply admitted what mechanical engineers pointed out was an obvious design flaw... one which they fixed in the next version... instead of letting users think it was all their fault.
 
So what battery technology does your Tesla use, lead acid?

How many Teslas have spontaneously blown up?
[doublepost=1472784778][/doublepost]
Nope, sorry, the webserver can't tell the mood of the person who clicked on the article, was served ads, and proceeded to click through to the forum - receiving more ads - and then posted many comments, receiving still more ads. It all looks like website activity to the webserver. And it all results in ad revenue. It feels good to think that they're sitting there going, "before we post this article, did Sonmi451 like the last such article?" But that's not happening. If they get negative feedback in the form of you (and thousands of others) sending email (not forum comments) saying you're unhappy, along with you (and thousands of others) ceasing to click on articles, thus measurably dropping ad revenue, then that will get their attention. But don't kid yourself that simply complaining here in the comments (something I definitely do as well) will have any substantial effect on the content of the website. It doesn't seem to even have much effect on the hordes of Apple Haters (sure, maybe some of them are merely disgruntled semi-former Apple Likers) who gather here each day with their torches and pitchforks in order to complain negatively about anything Apple does or doesn't do (seriously, there could be a story that "Tim Cook cures cancer and announces he likes puppies" and people would complain bitterly) - and they're all still generating ad revenue while yelling for Tim Cook's head on a pike.

For the record, I can't recall an article here on MacRumors that I've actively disliked - it's easy enough to skim the headlines and skip past the ones that don't interest me, and they all seem to present something of some level of interest to folks involved with Apple products (otherwise I wouldn't be coming back), but the comments - lately (past few months in particular) - have me wondering if it's worth chewing through the leather straps each morning.

You just haven't been here long enough. Please don't waste that much energy in a rebuttal, it's not really that much energy! I will give you the victory this time!
 
Really, you think I should not buy cars from a company that did not issue a recall within two days after finding a problem?

Where the cars likely to explode? Then I'd have to say, yes. By the way were a) and b) too unpalatable to answer?

Question: are you a student?

You already tried patronizing me once and it didn't work out then. For the record and I'm not a student and I'm not that much younger than you (judging by your picture)

Once again

a) Do you think that Samsung merely waiting and seeing if owners of phones that are faulty in a manner which may cause loss of life, limb or property saw something on the news and decided to stop using them? Do you think that's an appropriate level of care for human life?
 
I would've liked to see samsungs approach if it had sold as much and in as many countries as the iPhone 6 when the bendgate finally surfaced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Feenician
Losing a 1000 bucks phone is JUST an inconvenience?
Who said anyone was losing any money at all. I'm sure apple will deal with it appropriately, but it's certainly, as noted above, less inconvenient than having a phone explode in your face. Don't you think?
[doublepost=1472786227][/doublepost]
That's because Samsung unlike Apple admits their flaws and cares for their customers
They "care" only because of the massive injury related lawsuits they could potentially face. What nonsense. Apples customer care is about the best in the business overall, in spite of some of the ramblings in this place.
 
Honestly thought I'd seen it all but in this thread I've seen: -

- Multiple people trying to equate a fault that may maim or kill to a bent or unresponsive phone (that is typically replaced for free, unlike say, a face or finger)
- Many, many people praise Samsung for taking action when all they have done is stop selling the phone, but have actually done nothing about the many potentially deadly devices in circulation
- Every possible method to distract, redirect blame or guilt, or shut down conversation by making personal attacks

All entirely unironically. Incredible. One can only guess at people's motivations for this level of delusion or dishonesty.

I genuinely hope no-one is hurt or killed by the amoral (lack of) response of Samsung in this.
 
How many Teslas have spontaneously blown up?

I just know about the Tesla that drove underneath the semi truck when all the sensors failed to detect it was there. Visual sensors where fooled by sunlight reflecting off semi truck side. And radar sensors where aimed low enough so they were looking under truck trailer seeing no vehicle.

More than likely unless damaged in an accident, your Tesla batteries won't ignite. Have not heard of any Volt or Prius batteries self igniting. And their sales volume is much greater.

My only point was when you said you had nothing with Li Ion batteries. I thought the Tesla used Li Ion.

Li Ion battery chemistry is best choice due to the high energy density and lack of chemical memory effect. Using gasoline in vehicles which is highly volatile in vapor state, also has it's dangers. People seem to accept a degree of danger surrounding the use of vehicles. Most of us don't consider that we carry a potential incidiary device around with us in our pocket. Quite unlikely to occur, but still a possibility.

Recent advancements should improve on Li Ion battery safety and energy density. Hopefully will be to market soon. See below.

https://www.engadget.com/2015/06/18/safer-lithium-batteries-stanford/

http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise...oping-lithiumion-batteries-to-make-them-safer
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I've had several cars recalled for repairs of items that could burn me up or cause a crash. And no, the recall didn't happen in only two days after the problem was found.

Actually, auto Manufacterers can recall any vehicle for a defect up to 15 years. It's Soley dependent if the defect is pandemic across the same model in a consistent time line. The only reason I mention this is because it seems other forum members are comparing tech recalls compared to auto recalls, when they could not be farther from each other in similarities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
One or two iPhones in China catch fire because of people using crappy third party chargers, it's all over the news.

Samsung batteries exploding all over, causing one of the biggest recalls for a mobile device in history? Probably a non-story. We'll see, lol.
You are so right, and this is unfortunately the state of tech media. Gossip rags like The Verge seem hellbent on taking Apple down. They're indifferent to Samsung, because who cares if you take down an Android manufacturer? 10 more will just grow back in its place.
 
just for some fairness on a mac forum such as this.... my Apple Watch charger caught fire once.
 
If Samsung does recall all Galaxy Note 7 phones, it would be a double-whammy on the South Korean stock market along with the bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping, which took a sizable portion of the world's container shipping capacity out of operation (though Hyundai Shipping is looking a grabbing a large fraction of Hanjin's asset of operational ships).
 
When you make the news for every issue and its a big deal. Thats when you know you made it big.
See how happy Takata is for making the news. Latest air bag explosion death from semi truck carrying Takata air bags along with ammonium nitrate. Set off by air bag that ignited. Explosion felt two miles away. Who needs terrorist's when you have trucking company shipping Takata air bags along with truck full of explosive chemicals.
 
Knew it. I had you pegged from the first comment. Try reading what I said instead of hearing what you "think" I said. Then you might post something relevant.
You had me pegged? O RLY? LMAO dude chill the hell out. See this is what I'm talking you about. You over analyzing and getting overly butt hurt over such a trivial issue.

And "try posting something relevant" oh man, my feelings are hurt now. I just got insulted by some random person on the interwebs, oh whatever will I do...besides laugh uncontrollably
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.