They’ve had prototypes for a few years now and probably would have kept this one in inside testing for awhile. The problem is...Huawei.Clearly Samsung executives were still unsure why Apple never rushes first to market with a prototype product, thus the Galaxy Fold was born.
Oh no, that old story again. When everyone was complaining about iPhones and "holding it wrong", I looked at the instruction booklet of my Nokia phone (at that time Nokia was the absolute market leader), and it said "reception may fail if you hold the phone wrong". The difference is that with most phones, nobody checks how much force they need to bend them (because if you find out, your phone breaks), nobody checks how to hold it to make reception fail (because if you find out, you can't make phone calls), they only do that with iPhones.At least they are fixing it. If it was Apple they would tell you, you are folding it wrong
Shhh... we don't want to burst any bubbles.Apart from the fact that they're a huge conglomerate. LOL
Yep. If they were going to release them on April 26, they had to already be making them.They probably have 100,000 already finished units in a warehouse somewhere. This is going to be expensive...
The units broke after two days of use. In the whole of the EU, units must last for at least two years; if not, things become very expensive. Anything that is made today is broken, otherwise they would have shipped better units to reviewers. So everything that is already built is not going to be shipped.
"Hey QA, test this new device please. By careful. If you break it, the cost comes out of your salary". Number of phones broken during testing: Zero.I don't understand how none of this was discovered in testing.
That's total ********. While all the companies work on new products Apple maintains much more secrecy, so we don't know at what level their R&D on fold-able phones is... but based on the other products and their patents on them, we can say they will be much ahead of what Samesung just released.
For example:
Look at TouchID,Watch FaceID, AirPods etc... it took a while to catch up on TouchID and Watch where as for FaceID and AirPods they are still struggling to match with Apple even after 2 years... don't you understand something there?
Manufacturing a component is not equal to designing it, if it is equal then China would be number one in making new operating systems and phones...
I was listening to the idiot on The Vergecast (the one whose Fold developed a bulge beneath the screen before breaking) going on about how he has never reviewed a product that he has "loved this much" except for the fact that they all break; except for the protective layer on the screen taking scratches "like nobody's business" (which had dimple in it right out of the box); except for the fact that Android on tablets continues to be a train wreck; except for the crease that you can see and feel in the fold area (screen temp is slightly different on either side); except that it's too thick to comfortably fit in the pocket... WTactualF?
Man, Dan Dilger's article on Apple Insider was dead on in asking "Why is Samsung's Galaxy Fold graded on a curve?"
If anyone can purchase one then it’s a consumer product.
That's total ********. While all the companies work on new products Apple maintains much more secrecy, so we don't know at what level their R&D on fold-able phones is... but based on the other products and their patents on them, we can say they will be much ahead of what Samesung just released.
For example:
Look at TouchID,Watch FaceID, AirPods etc... it took a while to catch up on TouchID and Watch where as for FaceID and AirPods they are still struggling to match with Apple even after 2 years... don't you understand something there?
Manufacturing a component is not equal to designing it, if it is equal then China would be number one in making new operating systems and phones...
They probably have 100,000 already finished units in a warehouse somewhere. This is going to be expensive...
Who wants the bet they will just cancel the product?
You're right, it's on YouTube for everyone to go see.I’m not sure exactly how many they made but anyone projecting catastrophic loss on this similar to what they experienced with the Note 7 needs to keep in mind Samsung presented this during their Unpacked event as something of an experimental device not for the masses.
They announced in advance there would be a different level of service and warranty for the customers who signed on for one of these.
Some reviewers act like this is presented as some mass consumer product like their other phones but I thought Samsung was pretty clear it’s for the well-heeled people who can toss a little money around for the opportunity to be a test pilot for a new product class.
Still anecdotal, but seriously, take it to Apple. You should because you'll be doing your part to make them respond in a bigger way if needed.I was in this boat until we had three out of six of these laptops with keyboard issues including mine.
What makes you say that? Isn't Samsung typically known to make excellent hardware? And if they don't, they fox it (Note 7, for example).
I have an Apple Pencil 1st gen. It’s an absolute marvel.
Go watch the keynote for the Fold.You make it sound like the two are mutually exclusive. The “future” doesn’t really exist in practical terms. A rogue asteroid could be on course to wipe us all out and our future is moot and we don’t even know it.
Practically speaking we deal in product revolution by evolution in stages. Look at our present flagship phones. They’re boasting a refinement of components introduced at more raw stages on previous models.
It took years for Touch ID to work well for me, for example. The Face ID we have now will seem so primitive compared to future iterations.
Yes, this product was experimental. Most people wisely do carefully consider being early adopters. And in this case when we are looking at a very complex design in its earliest possible public iteration, it is experimental. It’s never been publicly utilized before. It looks rough. It clearly is rough. Samsung knew that and presented it with a very limited scope release at a high price to keep demand low. They were prepared to heavily warrant the displays.
I forgot to address the ridiculous assertion that this was their iPhone X launch equivalent. No, it was never meant to be widely distributed. They already released their mass consumption phones to celebrate their 10th Anniversary. This was not that device.
At least it WORKS as advertised!The way you charge it is not a marvel LOL.
Bad designs are not a failure if they work they are just bad designs, this phone looks to be a rush product and has failed.
Why say that Steve Jobs stuff again and again apple watch airpods is innovation apple dont rush like other companies that wanna just be the first, Samsung is silly for making that a terrible phoneHey at least they're trying something new. You can't succeed without failing. Apple hasn't innovated since Steve Jobs died.