I was of the same mind as both of you until this thought occurred to me -- if the iris/face recognition is reliable enough, and secure enough, then nobody will want to use the fingerprint scanner anymore. And if I wanted to wean people off of fingerprint scanners, I'd make it harder for them to use, but retain it as a failsafe until the iris/face recognition integration was flawless. If customers have no reason not to keep using the old fingerprint technology, then there's no incentive to start using, and thereby improving, the iris/face recognition tech. So this makes perfect sense. Move the fingerprint sensor to the back, thus making it harder to use, and encouraging the customer to use the new, preferred, alternate methods to unlock their phone which don't require any additional physical hardware.
Great looking phone, but... I have an LG with the fingerprint sensor on the back and it is a pain. It is much easier to use when it is on the front like my iPhone. At least Samsung didn't integrate the volume buttons with it - half the time I think I'm hitting the fingerprint sensor on the LG and I'm actually hitting the volume down button. Also, I don't know if I see the viability of being able to connect a keyboard and monitor to it. Unless it is offering full desktop versions of applications, you're just turning it into a tethered tablet. I can use my tablet for that...
Ok, call me an Apple fanboy, but here are my thoughts.
First off, I don't like larger screened phones. I've been accustomed to a 4 inch iPod touch (and before that a 3.5" one) and lately I've been using an iPhone 6 as a secondary wifi device. What in the world do these companies think they're doing by releasing a (more than 2x) DPI on a phone that is higher than the eye can easily distinguish? The massive edge to edge screen makes me worried that I'd be accidentally hitting things on the screen all the time, whereas the minimal bezel on the iPhones/iPod touches are plenty good to keep your fingers off the screen while you're holding it (especially one handed). Personally, one handed use is very important to me, and the fact this phone is large, and the home button/finger print scanner is on the back of the phone makes it impossible to use if the phone is set on a table, which is very common to do.
Lastly, why move the home button to the back, but then make a dedicated button for the voice assistant?
Sorry, I just had to laugh at some of these decisions, and I really hope Apple doesn't do any of these later this year, just because "that's what the people want".
Not a fan of having the finger print sensor on the back of the phone. The dual bluetooth feature is nice though.
Nice looking phone, mostly all aesthetics, dont functionally improve experience. These are the downsides for me.
- Fingerprint sensor in the back, horrible ergonomics
- Why doesn't Samsung phone use a Samsung processor - Exynos - this is not confidence inspiring
- No 3D touch like functionality - I love that feature on my iPhone
- No dual cameras - Samsung was not able to develop software (software not Samsung's forte) for DOF processing
- Paltry 4GB RAM
- What happened to the 'Edge' screen hype
- Samsung software comes with redundant functions that compete with native Android
- Non standard aspect ratio of the display - developers nightmare