Thank you
One of the few in this tread who understands the bigger picture - thank you
One of the few in this tread who understands the bigger picture - thank you
You don't understand patents I see.
The patent infringement discussed presently deals with patents granted before the iphone original was released.
The quality, depth and breath of patents issued to Apple post 2007 is at a supreme high bar.
2012 to date Apple has been granted 369 patents.
2012 to date Apple has published 335 patent applications.
In 2011, Apple was granted 676 patents.
After 4 months they have already have achieved 54.6% of their 2011 mark.
In 2010, Apple was granted 563 patents.
After 4 months they have already achieved 65.5% of their 2010 mark.
In 2009, Apple was granted 289 patents.
After 4 months they have already achieved 127.7% of their 2009 mark.
Apple should reach around 1100+ patents for 2012.
Apple received 103 patents in 2008.
So the years following the release of the original iPhone Apple has seen:
103, 289, 563, 676, 369* = 2000 and counting.
If you think those are not going to be defendable and are nothing but fluff, then think again.
Apple tends to develop, file and receive patents on products they actually make.
IBM is infamous for filing tens of thousands of patents on research they never end up producing in the form of products.
Since Steve discussed nearly 300 patents for the original iPhone Apple will have patented more than 9 times that number in a mere 5 years.