Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They should have rebranded it iMedia. iTunes is quite an inaccurate name nowadays.


I disagree. While some people may not like the icon, it really won't make a difference for the brand. The name iTunes is where almost ALL of the brand recognition is, so if they changed it to iMedia, despite that being much more fitting for what iTunes is now, that's when they'd be throwing away 10 years of brand recognition away.

As far as the icon goes, I don't mind it. A lot of Apple software has been using the glowing orb motif- all of the Core packages, and the new Quicktime icon is similar in style. I do however, prefer the colored icons within iTunes, but in the long run it doesn't really make a huge difference for me.
 
Seriously? You take the time to draft an email to one of the most powerful CEO's of any company in history, and you criticize a logo? REALLY?
 
The icon is different. People don't like different. Different feels bad, it takes people out of their comfort zones. The icon seems bad because it is different. That perspective will change over time.
You're right and you're wrong. People are emotionally tied to what they're used to, but in this case, it's not just emotion that's speaking out here. This is a bad logo. It's cheap. It speaks of a knee-jerk reaction. Jobs may be right that downloads are the future, but they are still not currently the big seller. CDs still FAR outsell downloads, regardless of what we may be told by the media - CDs are still the preferred format for the majority of people (I believe it's 75% of sales right now.) It is decreasing each year but CDs are going to be around for years.

Is Apple right to remove the CD from their logo? Sure. Itunes' focus is on digital music. They began as a means to move music from your own CD collection into the computer, but now they exist to be the source. So a logo that reflects that makes sense. This logo, however, reflects a hack job. As others have pointed out, it looks like it was done in minutes. Time alone isn't the factor in making or breaking a logo. It's just a reflection of the thought that went into this. It looks hasty, and that is what is worrisome. Actually, I think all of the design of this Itunes is hasty - it's very badly done. Ugly, ugly, ugly.
 
Eh... it retains its brand recognition well enough. There's some loss, but that's not such a big deal. I just don't like it. It seems less inspired and unique than other Apple icons—especially one as prominent as iTunes. I'm not sure what extent of this is graphic designer snobbery in me, a dislike of change related to an icon that has lived in my dock forever, or valid criticism, though.
 
Wow, what a well-developed rebuttal! I bet Steve was captain of his debate team in high school :D

Then again, when you get to be as important as Steve, you don't need to debate. You can just dictate!
 
I love the new icon. It's modern and esthetically pleasing!

They should add a little more color to the iTunes application. It is very boring a dull to look at. They don't need to go crazy but they should have made it better looking.
 
75 posts about a new icon. Are all of you in your 80s? Do you realize there were an equal number of outraged posts when the icon you are all defending was introduced? It was changed from green. The only valid criticism I've seen has to due with the number of round blue icons there are. But solving that problem might require a return to green. Oh my.

I preferred the green music note.
 
practical issue

While the icon design is a matter of taste, the removal of colors in the left sidebar create practical problems. I have around 50 items in there and it is taking me now approximately twice as long to find a playlist. Colors, or even gray shades, do help in pattern recognition.
 
I like the old icon and I am right and you are wrong.

:p

I think we should all move on and realize that different people have different opinions. I like the new one, you like the old one... it's a good thing it's east to do an icon change.

Find the old iTunes app
select and hit command+i
copy icon in top left corner using command+c
close window (command+w)
find new itunes app
select and hit command+i
select top left icon and hit command+v to paste
close window (command+w)

Life goes back to normal.
 
Some designer already addressed the general distaste for the icons by designing a set of his own:

http://dribbble.com/shots/51530-iTunes-10-Replacement-Icon-Rebound

I think they're great-looking icons. I'm using them on my machines.

exactly. I actually used one of these to replace the new one. And here is one of his that I changed to blue that I might use . . .

icons_3.jpg
 
Yeah . . . right. Take a look again buddy. ACTUAL Screenshots of this icon from my dock.

http://x-heightdesign.com/fun/icons_1.png

http://x-heightdesign.com/fun/icons_2.png

Sorry, your critique doesn't hold water.

Um... Which one is the actual size of your dock?

My dock is about the size of the second one, and those mini-icons within the icon are impossible to see in that one. Heck, even in the first one, I have to actually look at the icon for more than a quarter of a second to see those little bits.
 
While the icon design is a matter of taste, the removal of colors in the left sidebar create practical problems. I have around 50 items in there and it is taking me now approximately twice as long to find a playlist. Colors, or even gray shades, do help in pattern recognition.
I'm with you, having the same problem. I simply hate the fact they've made everything gray in the left sidebar.
 
As a graphic designer for over 20 years. I concur: that new logo sucks! It looks like someone created that in about 2 minutes. Let see, "Take generic 2 tone aqua color circle, add musical note . . . . and . . . . there you go! Instant logo. Can I interest you in 20 animated gifs for your web site now?"

I much rather prefer something like this:

http://dribbble.com/system/users/1474/screenshots/51530/shot_1283440682.png?1283440682

P.S. This icon was designed by Chris Carlozzi. He is a link to it.


A g.d. should understand better the idea of less is more. I mean, one would not be able to read the cute little transparent icons inside an icon at dock size. These things must be considered. To me, this is a gratuitous attempt. I think the new itunes logo is timeless.

-- designer for 20 years --
 
The new Icon rocks! Keep up the good work Steve!

It was about time you changed the icon!

It looks so much more apple like and up to the times!
 
First, I don't really care that much. I don't think there is anything wrong with slightly outdated metaphors (Mac OS was never really into this except for poorly designed apps, but nearly every Windows program still uses a floppy disk as the "save" icon, much to nobody's confusion). Everyone will know what a CD is for a long time to come. In fact, if they switched a phonograph icon instead I think it would be rather quaint but good. :D

That being said, I think this icon looks better at higher sizes than it does at dock size, but I'm sure we'll all get used to it--and there's nothing stopping them from refining it as time goes by.
 
I disagree. While some people may not like the icon, it really won't make a difference for the brand. The name iTunes is where almost ALL of the brand recognition is, so if they changed it to iMedia, despite that being much more fitting for what iTunes is now, that's when they'd be throwing away 10 years of brand recognition away.

They could keep the iTunes Music Store, but use iMedia for the app itself.

iMedia:
iTunes Music Store
iMovies Movie Store
iBooks Book Store
App Store

;)
 
I don't know what all the fuss is. My icon is the same today as it was before iTunes 10.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2010-09-03 at 2.34.39 PM.jpg
    Screen shot 2010-09-03 at 2.34.39 PM.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 648
I think it's just a simple icon for simple users (AKA Mac users).

I keeeeeed!!! :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.