It would be interesting to see them take that same panel and develop a 16" MBA with it...
I did haha. But I got a great deal on mine (8% off) so I’m trying to remind myself that it was totally worth it.
Apple have been the biggest ********ters since they released the new MBPs.
The original MBPs were $1999, they then released the new Macbook pros by keeping the $1999 old macbook pros and priced the new ones at $2399.
Now the new macbook pros START at $2399.
These 16 inchers are going to start at $2799, with the original ones at $2399...
Why you hate catalina since its better than MojaveI think you still want that machine to get work done. This is all speculation and vaporware on a rumors site.
I want the new 15" I ordered yesterday even more now. Screw Catalina.
If the new 16" MBP doesn't have the new scissor keyboard then most people will probably just hold until 2020. And for the love of God add more ports other then the 4 USB-C on this one.
Please Intel/Apple or both put a chip set in the Macbook Air that is faster than my 2 year old iPad!! Must they continue to defang their best selling laptop of all time??
#dontgetit
ALL portable, high performance portable devices in a slim package will throttle, so that's not really the question we should be asking. The real question is will it throttle more or less than similarly svelte products?
I can't imagine the MBP 13 and MBA being updated in October. Imagine if you just bought a new MBP 13 or Air.
Gentle reminder to be wary of 1st-generation Apple products.
Pointless reminder because anyone can buy a 1st gen Apple product and:
1. Return it within 14-days if there is anything seriously wrong with it.
2. Get it fixed under warranty within the first year if there is anything wrong that develops.
A lot of people were saying by 2015 that the Air had become so competent it was encroaching into the 13" Pro's territory, Apple responded by dropping the price of the 13" Pro to $1,299 so it was attractive against the Air's $999 price tag, but as the Pro had 2x the RAM, retina, more ports and was only slightly thicker & heavier, this over compensated and made the Air the one that seemed a bit pointless.You're not the only one...the non-Retina MacBook Air had always used Intel's 15w TDP Core i5 and i7 CPUs before the Retina MacBook Air was released. This is a complete turnoff given the value proposition the MacBook Air used to represent. The same 1.4GHz and 1.7GHz CPUs that are used in the refreshed 2019 13" MacBook Pro should have been what Apple used last year at intro. Hell, even Whiskey Lake U-Series (i5-8365U and i7-8665U) would have been better choices GPU-wise (UHD 620) than the 7w Y-series w/UHD 617 and the CPU speed of Whiskey Lake would have far surpassed the anemic i5-8210Y they used instead. Apple seems determined to hold the MacBook Air back to sell more entry level 13" MacBook Pros...to me, there is really no point to the 13" MacBook Air after last week's refresh. Just my 2¢.
Gentle reminder to be wary of 1st-generation Apple products.
Gentle reminder to be wary of 1st-generation Apple products.
Disagree. I think the ideal Macbook lineup would be:My ideal MacBook line-up:
- MacBook (11.6-inch) - Intel Core i3 or i5
- MacBook Air (13.3-inch) - Intel Core i3 or i5 + Radeon Pro 555X
- MacBook Pro (15.6-inch) - Intel Core i5, i7 + Radeon Pro 555X or 560X
- MacBook Pro (17.3-inch) - Intel Core i5, i7 or i9 + Radeon Pro 560X, RX 570 or RX 580
- Power MacBook (19.5-inch) - Intel i7, i9 or Xeon E + Radeon RX 570, RX 580, RX 590 or Pro WX 3200
Pointless reminder because anyone can buy a 1st gen Apple product and:
1. Return it within 14-days if there is anything seriously wrong with it.
2. Get it fixed under warranty within the first year if there is anything wrong that develops.