Well it is my dollars apple is trying to get...Ugly according to you.
Well it is my dollars apple is trying to get...Ugly according to you.
There are different parts of an iPhone (front, backs, sides, camera bump). Sometimes we may have to sacrifice the aesthetics of one of the parts for functionality, but overall the phone looks good. I don’t see the big deal because overall the phone still looks good and I trust Apple had a good reason for the design.Anyone here that says design doesn’t matter is in utter denial and simply kidding themselves.
Good design is everything - back in the day, good design is exactly what separated Apple from the rest of the pack, and it was the cornerstone of their success and rise to prominence.
Are you saying you’d be okay buying an ugly-looking Porsche just because you’re always on the inside when you drive it? Because you prefer function over form?
Please stop shamelessly defending Apple by making convenient/illogical arguments.
Purely as a minor personal point of view I think it looks better than the three. None of them are particularly beautiful though. The iPhone 11 is definitely the phone that will have the wider appeal though as it has all the features and is a good price.What’s better looking about the 11? The huge square minus a lens looks weird to me.
So exactly what is your dream phone? No camera bump? And stick with ****** photos?Wow, what a hideous beast.
Sure they may be the most powerful iPhones or smartphones ever made but their design is quite an eye sore, mainly due to the obtrusive ugly camera housing. There is now not one camera bump, but THREE separate camera bumps on top of the main camera housing bump. These bumps and grooves will collect dust, grime, dirt, and other crap like no tomorrow! Slapping on a case doesn't excuse lazy design!
Even the iPhone X/XS looks better than the 11 Pros because it has only one camera bump and flush sensors.
Just look at this thing:
View attachment 857081
I'm not scared of spiders but after seeing the 11 Pros, I am now. For comparison:
View attachment 857084
The ‘ugly’ antenna lines on the 6 series were easily masked with a case, but there’s no way to hide this big ugly (barf) square sticking out (unless you don’t wanna use the camera at all ), imo of course!
If I’m paying upwards of a $1000 (Pro model) for a handheld device, it better be aesthetically pleasing!
As I mentioned, I’m playing devils advocate.the S10 is half a mil thinner than iPhone 11 and 0.3 mm thinner than iPhone 11 pro and manages to have a nearly flush back and great cameras too. I’ll never switch bc i hate android os, but I think you’re inventing reasons to defend an ugly device
the S10 is half a mil thinner than iPhone 11 and 0.3 mm thinner than iPhone 11 pro and manages to have a nearly flush back and great cameras too
My fella’s got the Note 10+ and it is a masterpiece compared to this.
who gives a sh*t, its on the back of the phone? The pictures will come out great. Im more concerned about how the front looks. Everyone slated airpods when they first came out, 2 years later they're almost a "fashion" piece
I'd make the iPhone little bit bigger so the lenses wouldn't stick out and use all the extra internal space for more battery.
who gives a sh*t, its on the back of the phone? The pictures will come out great. Im more concerned about how the front looks. Everyone slated airpods when they first came out, 3 years later they're almost a "fashion" piece
You do know this is Apple we're talking about? Samsung, LG, Huawei they could all get a pass with design like this. But not Apple, which was ALWAYS about design first, and funcionality later. Dont try to defend this monstrosity with "it'll take great pictures!". The only thing that matters at Apple is "Damn that looks nice!"It’s pretty funny to watch. Apple got them to care so much about back of the phone. Uhh. Duhh. The camera sticks out. Lol. Omg. I want green! Then the moron sticks a case on it anyways and will never notice it again.
Maybe it’s a millennial thing or just whining because they need to justify not being able to afford it. These aren’t the ones fascinated by the new tech packed inside. Nope they’re too obsessed that the back isn’t pretty enough to toss into a ugly cheap 10 dollar case. So dumb on many levels.
I think it looks pretty good myself. But then again I never bought a phone, tablet, computer or tv because of what the back of what the device looks like. That’s pretty stupid.
What? You serious? better than 2G or 3G? 2G was a leap forwards back then when it came to phone design, 3G sure was plasticy at the back, yet it was still elegant and nice to look at.Look worse than I was expecting based on final renders (think it's the metal rimmed cameras that stick out even further than the bump) but still look nicer than the plastic 3G/S and the chubby 2G.