That stand looks great.
Can’t wait to preorder the display and the stand.
Can’t wait to preorder the display and the stand.
TBH if I’m paying $5K for the monitor I don’t want some flimsy stand. And hinges have been known to have issues as well. Just saying.
Apple today unveiled the Pro Display XDR, a 32-inch 6K monitor with a P3 wide color gamut and true 10-bit color support, 1,600 nits of peak brightness, a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio, and a super-wide, off-axis viewing angle.
![]()
Apple's press release:The display will be available in the fall, starting at $4,999, but that price doesn't include the stand. If you want the display to come on Apple's stand, as it is shown in official product images, that'll cost an extra $999. Unsurprisingly, the reaction to this news has been quite strong across social media.
The display will accompany Apple's all-new modular Mac Pro, which will also be available in the fall starting at $5,999.
Article Link: The Stand for Apple's New $4,999 Pro Display Costs an Extra $999
WOW, first thought was, is this 2006 AGAIN? I guess Apple was right, they can invent (well recycle) again.View attachment 840565 What was the Vesa adapter they showed?
WOW, first thought was, is this 2006 AGAIN? I guess Apple was right, they can invent (well recycle) again.
My question is, why is Apple doing this? You'd think they know this would result in bad press for basically no good reason. They're not going to sell many of these displays, so they're likely not going to make much profit selling these stands.
What's their angle here? Are they really this tone deaf?
Have you people never shopped for a counter-balanced display mount before? They're not cheap. We use Humanscale ones at work, and they're something like $400 each, and meh quality to be honest. The price of the Apple one is certainly high, but assuming it's actually very good and figuring in the Apple-tax, I don't actually think it's unreasonable.
Or, do people really plan on putting a $5000 display on a crappy plastic stand?
I doubt anyone commenting is in the market segment to buy this monitor.Have you people never shopped for a counter-balanced display mount before? They're not cheap. We use Humanscale ones at work, and they're something like $400 each, and meh quality to be honest. The price of the Apple one is certainly high, but assuming it's actually very good and figuring in the Apple-tax, I don't actually think it's unreasonable.
Or, do people really plan on putting a $5000 display on a crappy plastic stand?
I doubt anyone commenting is in the market segment to buy this monitor.
This is about “optics.”
Sad part of this? Apple could read these hundreds and thousands of comments about how insane this price is but read one comment like his and feel justified. “See? This guy gets it!”I knew somebody would be ok with it! Seriously? I’ve got every Apple gadget known to mankind, I’ve paid over £1.2k for a phone, more for an iPad Pro, said goodbye to the best part of £4K for a Macbook Pro and even coughed up £7k for an iMac Pro. But a chuffing grand for a stand?!
Best keynote for years and they went and did that? Even with my fan boy blinkers on, I can’t think of any circumstances where I’d want to pay for a stand at all (ok I might be talked into a few hundred if I was drunk) but that really is a joke! Is it encrusted with the tears of dragons or something?
I have an easy fix then, sell a $6,000 display and include the stand. Don't split out the stand pricing and really kill the good press being generated.Have you people never shopped for a counter-balanced display mount before? They're not cheap. We use Humanscale ones at work, and they're something like $400 each, and meh quality to be honest. The price of the Apple one is certainly high, but assuming it's actually very good and figuring in the Apple-tax, I don't actually think it's unreasonable.
Or, do people really plan on putting a $5000 display on a crappy plastic stand?
Agreed. Apple really should have priced the monitor at $6000 and offered a -$1000 bto option of a stand delete. Same net result, way better optics.I doubt anyone commenting is in the market segment to buy this monitor.
This is about “optics.”
Agreed completely. That was unforced error on Apple's part.I have an easy fix then, sell a $6,000 display and include the stand. Don't split out the stand pricing and really kill the good press being generated.
My question is, why is Apple doing this? You'd think they know this would result in bad press for basically no good reason. They're not going to sell many of these displays, so they're likely not going to make much profit selling these stands.
What's their angle here? Are they really this tone deaf?
Does it come with a stand at all? Or do you just lay flat on the desk?![]()
Someone in China will create a knock-off stand for 99¢
True. And that new $5000 monitor will end up on the floor.Meanwhile somebody in Shenzhen is working on a unauthorised stand for the 6K XDR and prepares to sell it at 99$
It has VESA mount holes on the back. You don't need to use this stand for it -- you can use whatever stand you want.Hey Apple, if you wanted $6k for the monitor then you should've just priced it at $6k rather than charging $5k and insulting our intelligence by charging an additional $1k for the stand nearly everyone will need anyway.